XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00097452 United Nations Development Programme To operationalize integrated agroecosystem management through mainstreaming biodiversity conservation in the production landscape and increasing resilience of agricultural system Government of Grenada UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Global Environment Fund Truste registry.bb@undp.org https://www.undp.org/barbados Grenada The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00101168 United Nations Development Programme To operationalize integrated agroecosystem management through mainstreaming biodiversity conservation in the production landscape and increasing resilience of agricultural system Government of Grenada Global Environment Fund Truste registry.bb@undp.org https://www.undp.org/barbados Grenada Saint George's capital of a political entity 12.052880 -61.752260 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 473798 1622498 380680 394164 1542307 429199 872293 872293 129534 United Nations Development Programme 1960 United Nations Development Programme 4078 United Nations Development Programme 45578 United Nations Development Programme 16367 United Nations Development Programme 10943 United Nations Development Programme 11367 United Nations Development Programme 10030 United Nations Development Programme 2889 United Nations Development Programme 10030 United Nations Development Programme 171140 United Nations Development Programme 83625 United Nations Development Programme 41857 United Nations Development Programme 21941 United Nations Development Programme 38181 United Nations Development Programme 58428 United Nations Development Programme 49601 United Nations Development Programme 30125 United Nations Development Programme 46732 United Nations Development Programme 77782 United Nations Development Programme 4410 United Nations Development Programme 9990 United Nations Development Programme 8101 United Nations Development Programme 6062 United Nations Development Programme 33644 United Nations Development Programme -1481 United Nations Development Programme 1783 United Nations Development Programme 5230 United Nations Development Programme 423829 United Nations Development Programme 257011 United Nations Development Programme 172536 United Nations Development Programme 2257102 Government of Grenada Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). 1. Number of new partnership mechanisms with funding for SLM/CSA solutions and for biodiversity and ecosystem services at national and/or sub-national level by project end 2. Number of direct project beneficiaries with increased livelihoods created through CSA, SLM, and rangeland management in the project prioritized landscapes, disaggregated by sex, as a result of the project 3. Number of integrated watershed management plans integrating biodiversity conservation, SLM and CSA covering at least 50% of the 5 prioritized watersheds and operationalized 4. Number of cross-sectoral collaboration/ agreements established for land use planning and management 5. Percentage rating in the capacity of Forestry and National Parks Department as measured through the UNDP Capacity Development Scorecard 6. Percentage rating in the capacity of the Land Use Division as measured through the UNDP Capacity Development Scorecard 7. Percentage rating in the capacity of the Ministry of Carriacou and Petit Martinique as measured through the UNDP Capacity Development Scorecard 8. Percentage change in the level of awareness among stakeholders in the St. David, St. Andrew, and St. Patrick parishes and in Carriacou and Petit Martinique about biodiversity conservation, SLM, and CSA objectives as measured through the KAP/B Index 9. Financing available for supporting SLM and CSA nationally in USD 10. Area in ha within the watersheds of Great River, La Sagesse and St. Patrick where climate resilient crops are successfully implemented 11. Number of women benefiting annually from demonstration activities and supply of climate-resilient crop varieties 12. Soil erosion rate measured as ton/ha/year in steep and upland areas in three prioritized watersheds: La Sagesse Watershed, Great River Watershed and Levera/Levera Pond/St Patrick Watershed 13. Income levels measured in USD per year of beneficiary households (disaggregated by gender) by project end 14. Percentage change in area affected by major IAS 1. 0 2. 0 3. 0 4. 0 5. 36 6. 31 7. 27 8. 0 9. 6000000 10. 140 11. 0 12. 7.11 13. 4400 14. 0 15. 136 16. 0 17. 0 18. 0 19. 0 20. 0 1. 0 2. 0 3. 0 4. 0 5. 36 6. 31 7. 27 8. 0 9. 6000000 10. 140 11. 0 12. 7.11 13. 4400 14. 0 15. 136 16. 0 17. 0 18. 0 19. 0 20. 0 1. 0 2. 0 3. 0 4. 0 5. 0 6. 0 7. 0 8. 0 9. 0 10. 0 11. 0 12. 0 13. 0 14. 0 15. 0 16. 0 17. 0 18. 0 19. 0 20. 0 1. 0 2. Males - 282, Females - 121 3. 2 4. 1 5. 43 6. 38 7. 34 8. 0 9. 6,600,000 10. 180 11. 255 12. 6.57 13. 4400 14. 0 15. 136 16. 0 17. 0 18. 890 19. 0 20. 5 1. 0 2. 0 3. 0 4. 0 5. 0 6. 0 7. 0 8. 0 9. 0 10. 0 11. 43 12. 0 13. 0 14. 0 15. 0 16. 0 17. 0 18. 74 19. 0 20. 0 Mandatory indicator 1. Project Objective: To operationalize integrated agroecosystem management through mainstreaming biodiversity conservation in the production landscape and increasing resilience of agricultural system. Mandatory indicator 2. GEF7 Core Indicator 11: Number of direct beneficiaries disaggregated by gender as co-benefit of GEF investment. Project Objective: To operationalize integrated agroecosystem management through mainstreaming biodiversity conservation in the production landscape and increasing resilience of agricultural system. Indicator 3. Project Objective: To operationalize integrated agroecosystem management through mainstreaming biodiversity conservation in the production landscape and increasing resilience of agricultural system. Indicator 4. Component 1: Systemic and institutional capacity increased for integrated landscape management at the national level. Outcome 1.1: Biodiversity conservation mainstreamed in land use planning and management practices, and in the agricultural sector policies and legislation, as a result of improved systemic and national institutional capacity for landscapes management for biodiversity conservation. Outcome 1.2: Strengthened systemic and institutional capacity for promoting SLM. Indicator 5. Component 1: Systemic and institutional capacity increased for integrated landscape management at the national level. Outcome 1.1: Biodiversity conservation mainstreamed in land use planning and management practices, and in the agricultural sector policies and legislation, as a result of improved systemic and national institutional capacity for landscapes management for biodiversity conservation. Outcome 1.2: Strengthened systemic and institutional capacity for promoting SLM. Indicator 6. Component 1: Systemic and institutional capacity increased for integrated landscape management at the national level. Outcome 1.1: Biodiversity conservation mainstreamed in land use planning and management practices, and in the agricultural sector policies and legislation, as a result of improved systemic and national institutional capacity for landscapes management for biodiversity conservation. Outcome 1.2: Strengthened systemic and institutional capacity for promoting SLM. To be determined during first year of project implementation To be determined during first year of project implementation Indicator 7. Component 2: National capacity built to provide financial, technical, and information services for CSA production. Outcome 2.1: Increased financing for supporting SLM and CSA at the national level. Outcome 2.2: National level capacities enhanced for CSA production. Indicator 8. Component 2: National capacity built to provide financial, technical, and information services for CSA production. Outcome 2.1: Increased financing for supporting SLM and CSA at the national level. Outcome 2.2: National level capacities enhanced for CSA production. Indicator 9. Component 2: National capacity built to provide financial, technical, and information services for CSA production. Outcome 2.1: Increased financing for supporting SLM and CSA at the national level. Outcome 2.2: National level capacities enhanced for CSA production. Indicator 10. Component 3: Operationalization of resilient agricultural practices. Outcome 3.1: Land area within 2,400 ha is managed under sustainable land management supporting CSA, evidenced by: and increased household income level with beneficiaries disaggregated by gender. Outcome 3.2: Biodiversity conservation mainstreamed in management of landscapes covering 960 ha. Indicator 11. Component 3: Operationalization of resilient agricultural practices. Outcome 3.1: Land area within 2,400 ha is managed under sustainable land management supporting CSA, evidenced by: and increased household income level with beneficiaries disaggregated by gender. Outcome 3.2: Biodiversity conservation mainstreamed in management of landscapes covering 960 ha. Indicator 15. GEF core indicator 4. Component 3: Operationalization of resilient agricultural practices. Outcome 3.1: Land area within 2,400 ha is managed under sustainable land management supporting CSA, evidenced by: and increased household income level with beneficiaries disaggregated by gender. Outcome 3.2: Biodiversity conservation mainstreamed in management of landscapes covering 960 ha. Indicator 16. GEF core indicator 6. Component 3: Operationalization of resilient agricultural practices. Outcome 3.1: Land area within 2,400 ha is managed under sustainable land management supporting CSA, evidenced by: and increased household income level with beneficiaries disaggregated by gender. Outcome 3.2: Biodiversity conservation mainstreamed in management of landscapes covering 960 ha. Indicator 17. Component 4: Knowledge management for SLM, CSA and biodiversity conservation. Outcome 4.1: Increased adoption of practices as a result of the dissemination of knowledge and best practices developed under this project. Indicator 18. Component 4: Knowledge management for SLM, CSA and biodiversity conservation. Outcome 4.1: Increased adoption of practices as a result of the dissemination of knowledge and best practices developed under this project. Indicator 12. Component 3: Operationalization of resilient agricultural practices. Outcome 3.1: Land area within 2,400 ha is managed under sustainable land management supporting CSA, evidenced by: and increased household income level with beneficiaries disaggregated by gender. Outcome 3.2: Biodiversity conservation mainstreamed in management of landscapes covering 960 ha. Indicator 13. Component 3: Operationalization of resilient agricultural practices. Outcome 3.1: Land area within 2,400 ha is managed under sustainable land management supporting CSA, evidenced by: and increased household income level with beneficiaries disaggregated by gender. Outcome 3.2: Biodiversity conservation mainstreamed in management of landscapes covering 960 ha. Indicator 14. Component 3: Operationalization of resilient agricultural practices. Outcome 3.1: Land area within 2,400 ha is managed under sustainable land management supporting CSA, evidenced by: and increased household income level with beneficiaries disaggregated by gender. Outcome 3.2: Biodiversity conservation mainstreamed in management of landscapes covering 960 ha. XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00123958 United Nations Development Programme The Grenada Spotlight Initiative is a well-conceived comprehensive national programme to contribute to end family violence and all forms of violence against women and girls in Grenada, Carriacou and Petite Martinique. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Spotlight Initiative Fund UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.bb@undp.org https://www.undp.org/barbados Grenada UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00119044 United Nations Development Programme The Grenada Spotlight Initiative is a well-conceived comprehensive national programme to contribute to end family violence and all forms of violence against women and girls in Grenada, Carriacou and Petite Martinique. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Spotlight Initiative Fund registry.bb@undp.org https://www.undp.org/barbados Grenada Saint George's capital of a political entity 12.052880 -61.752260 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 247178 200182 346999 179883 19 United Nations Development Programme -19 United Nations Development Programme 442 United Nations Development Programme 9437 United Nations Development Programme -401 United Nations Development Programme 15965 United Nations Development Programme 12466 United Nations Development Programme 59443 United Nations Development Programme 27528 United Nations Development Programme 10549 United Nations Development Programme 11883 United Nations Development Programme 19140 United Nations Development Programme 18547 United Nations Development Programme 13626 United Nations Development Programme 3060 United Nations Development Programme 4604 United Nations Development Programme 6611 United Nations Development Programme 6710 United Nations Development Programme 144635 United Nations Development Programme 135952 United Nations Development Programme 13415 United Nations Development Programme 363523 MPTF-Spotlight Initiative Fund United Nations Development Programme 513612 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). 1) Number of evidence-based national action plans on ending VAWG developed that respond to the rights of groups facing intersecting and multiple forms of discrimination with M&E frameworks and proposed budgets within the last year. 2) Existence of functioning regional, national and/or sub-national coordination and oversight mechanisms at the highest levels for addressing VAWG/HP that include representation from marginalized groups (YES/NO) 3) Availability of internal and external accountability mechanisms within relevant government institutions in place to monitor GEWE and VAW/HP (YES/NO) 4) Number of targeted national and sub-national training institutions for public servants that have integrated gender equality and VAWG in their curriculum, as per international standards. 5) Multi-stakeholder coordination mechanisms established/strengthened (YES/NO). 6) Number of national and sub-national multi-stakeholder coordination mechanisms that include representatives of groups facing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination established. 7) System to collect administrative data on VAWG/HP, is in place and in line with international standards, across different sectors (YES/NO) 8) Number of knowledge products developed and disseminated to the relevant stakeholders to inform evidence-based decision making. 9) Number of female government personnel, including service providers, from different sectors with strengthened capacities on analysis and dissemination of prevalence and/or incidence data on VAWG. 10) Number of women's rights groups, networks and relevant CSOs with strengthened capacities to network, partner and jointly advocate for progress on ending VAWG at local, national, regional and global levels, within the last year. 1) 0 2) NO 3) NO 4) 0 5) NO 6) 0 7) NO 8) 0 9) 0 10) 0 1) 0 2) NO 3) NO 4) 4 5) YES 6) 0 7) YES 8) 20 9) 24 10) 10 1) 0 2) NO 3) NO 4) 0 5) NO 6) 0 7) NO 8) 0 9) 0 10) 0 1) 0 2) NO 3) NO 4) 0 5) NO 6) 0 7) NO 8) 0 9) 0 10) 0 1) 1 2) NO 3) NO 4) TBC 5) NO 6) 0 7) NO 8) TBC 9) TBC 10) TBC 1) 0 2) NO 3) NO 4) 4 5) NO 6) 0 7) NO 8) 0 9) 0 10) TBC Multi-stakeholder coordination mechanisms are established at the highest level and/or strengthened Three (3) of the national and sub-national multi-stakeholder coordination mechanisms that include representatives of groups facing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination