XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00051355 United Nations Development Programme Support to Resident Coordinator Office: support adequate capacity (technical, Financial and Logistical ) for delivering as one. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-UN Uganda MPTF GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00063914 United Nations Development Programme Norwegian funding provided support adequate capacity (technical, Financial and Logistical ) for delivering as one. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Eradicate poverty in all its forms and dimensions 41633 258769 612327 520756 365932 452887 515495 56 United Nations Development Programme -56 United Nations Development Programme 2961 United Nations Development Programme -4177 United Nations Development Programme 4860 United Nations Development Programme 53654 United Nations Development Programme 12741 United Nations Development Programme 8848 United Nations Development Programme -27338 United Nations Development Programme 3990 United Nations Development Programme 17768 United Nations Development Programme 93938 United Nations Development Programme 11144 United Nations Development Programme 16545 United Nations Development Programme 21960 United Nations Development Programme 28142 United Nations Development Programme 3186 United Nations Development Programme 10899 United Nations Development Programme 536143 United Nations Development Programme 365691 United Nations Development Programme 266111 United Nations Development Programme 350516 United Nations Development Programme 232780 United Nations Development Programme -9001 GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY United Nations Development Programme 5800 GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY United Nations Development Programme -63492 GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY United Nations Development Programme 515495 GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY United Nations Development Programme 2010363 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00129618 United Nations Development Programme Support UN Coherence Efforts in Uganda for COVID-19 Response line with the current pandemic support to Uganda United Nations Development Programme MPTF-UN Uganda MPTF registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 100 8008 118748 10 -46 United Nations Development Programme 80 United Nations Development Programme -4118 United Nations Development Programme 8483 United Nations Development Programme 108 United Nations Development Programme 1550 United Nations Development Programme 112626 United Nations Development Programme 118758 MPTF-UN Uganda MPTF United Nations Development Programme 118783 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00070364 United Nations Development Programme Initial Plan is itended to support critical start up activities associated with UNDP Uganda support to development of an impartial and independent platform for internal dialogue and mediation on key national issues. Secondly, initial plan is United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME EUROPEAN UNION UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00090708 United Nations Development Programme Peace Architecture for Conflict Transformation Framework focuses on building Mediation and dialogue capacities to facilitate policy, governance settlements as well as internal dialogue to influence the political reform agenda United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME EUROPEAN UNION registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 3 474000 2288350 1475397 312220 7 United Nations Development Programme 570 United Nations Development Programme 3420 United Nations Development Programme 3420 United Nations Development Programme 6689 United Nations Development Programme 523526 United Nations Development Programme 2361429 United Nations Development Programme 1281898 United Nations Development Programme 172076 United Nations Development Programme 4353035 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). 1. National Consultative Forum (NCF) fully operational with key capacities to deliver on constitutional mandate 2.Existence of legislation associated with electoral processes and multiparty political dispensation 3. Operational Non-state dialogue platform in place i.e policy and governance settlements facilitated by the National Elders Forum (NEF) and Operational framework for NEF finalized 4. Policy and governance settlements facilitated by Non-structures (NEF and in close conjunction with NCF and IRCU) 5. Regional peace and conflict transformation forums in place- led dialogue and internal mediation in diffusing conflict triggers at regional levels 6. Existence of Independent and impartial secretariat for the operations of the NEF/NCF/IRCU. 1. Forum for dialogue with constitutional mandate exists with limited information on capacity needs of forum 2. Political reform dialogue towards strengthening multiparty political dispensation within NCF not yet fully developed. Core Electoral reform proposals already developed/identified. NCF support for approval through next steps of legislative processes needed. 3. Non-state dialogue platform not fully operationalized 4. Limited non-state structures that can facilitate dialogue and consensus building 5. Regional level peace-building infrastructure is weak and limited in capacity 6. Independent and impartial secretariat for the operations of the NEF is not in existence. Project financially closed Project financially closed XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00072037 United Nations Development Programme 1. Ecosystem catalysed to develop innovations with big data and real-time analytics to achieve and monitor SDGs localization 2. Project and tools developed are used to monitor and achieve SDG localization United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Undefined UN Office for Project Services GOVERNMENT OF BELGIUM BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION (SIDA) THE WILLIAM AND FLORE HEWLETT FOUNDATION UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00085278 United Nations Development Programme Support to Kampala Pulse Lab Initiative to increase Resilience and well-being of Ugandan vulnerable populations to economic and other shocks with appropriate Government interventions and responses. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME THE WILLIAM AND FLORE HEWLETT FOUNDATION SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION (SIDA) GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION GOVERNMENT OF BELGIUM UN Office for Project Services Undefined registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 162400 801000 924040 791816 415531 614276 737932 931707 615836 766225 1083936 840179 520716 48170 6067 United Nations Development Programme 33580 United Nations Development Programme 67508 United Nations Development Programme 96279 United Nations Development Programme 39964 United Nations Development Programme 38849 United Nations Development Programme 46104 United Nations Development Programme 38975 United Nations Development Programme 137175 United Nations Development Programme 111247 United Nations Development Programme 46198 United Nations Development Programme 41080 United Nations Development Programme 45311 United Nations Development Programme 75965 United Nations Development Programme 103205 United Nations Development Programme 53437 United Nations Development Programme 43880 United Nations Development Programme 75110 United Nations Development Programme 54344 United Nations Development Programme 46587 United Nations Development Programme 34973 United Nations Development Programme 77803 United Nations Development Programme 146472 United Nations Development Programme 39912 United Nations Development Programme 25956 United Nations Development Programme 92828 United Nations Development Programme 52741 United Nations Development Programme 39465 United Nations Development Programme 75251 United Nations Development Programme 174366 United Nations Development Programme 44110 United Nations Development Programme 23871 United Nations Development Programme 15309 United Nations Development Programme 60015 United Nations Development Programme -12068 United Nations Development Programme 10980 United Nations Development Programme 32771 United Nations Development Programme 462789 United Nations Development Programme 620870 United Nations Development Programme 693543 United Nations Development Programme 715223 United Nations Development Programme 626470 United Nations Development Programme 692653 United Nations Development Programme 715435 United Nations Development Programme 712421 United Nations Development Programme 481240 United Nations Development Programme 1208 United Nations Development Programme 185001 UN Office for Project Services United Nations Development Programme 1000000 THE WILLIAM AND FLORE HEWLETT FOUNDATION United Nations Development Programme 255424 UN Office for Project Services United Nations Development Programme 607593 UN Office for Project Services United Nations Development Programme 990000 THE WILLIAM AND FLORE HEWLETT FOUNDATION United Nations Development Programme 109184 UN Office for Project Services United Nations Development Programme 250000 THE WILLIAM AND FLORE HEWLETT FOUNDATION United Nations Development Programme -7311 GOVERNMENT OF BELGIUM United Nations Development Programme 250000 THE WILLIAM AND FLORE HEWLETT FOUNDATION United Nations Development Programme 499203 GOVERNMENT OF BELGIUM United Nations Development Programme 324982 SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION (SIDA) United Nations Development Programme 896328 UN Office for Project Services United Nations Development Programme 100000 BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION United Nations Development Programme 32000 GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK United Nations Development Programme 267889 SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION (SIDA) United Nations Development Programme 364498 GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK United Nations Development Programme 513963 GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK United Nations Development Programme 8076947 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) 1. Number of data innovation projects completed and used to advocate for a global partnership to tap into the data revolution to advance/monitor SDGs. 2. Number of data innovation projects completed and used to advance/monitor SDGs with data science. 3. Existence of advocacy events supporting the development of regulatory frameworks and technical standards to address data sharing and privacy protection challenges, engage key stakeholders on a priority innovation agenda 1. No of data innovation projects in place to advocate for a global partnership to tap into the data revolution to advance/monitor Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). 2. No of data innovation projects to advance/monitor SDGs with data science. 3. Non-existence of advocacy events to support the development of regulatory frameworks and technical standards to address data sharing and privacy protection challenges, engage key stakeholders on a priority innovation agenda Output 1. Ecosystem enabled by Pulse Lab Kampala for development and adoption of data innovations with big data and real-time analytics to achieve and monitor SDGs localization. 1. 1. 1 No of Private sector companies join the “data philanthropy” movement . 1.1.2 No of Government counterparts adopt real time analytics for SDGs achievement and monitoring 1.1.3 Use of data innovation to support UN Joint Programming and UN Convergence Areas 1.1.4 Participation of the Academia on data innovation for SDG projects Output 2. Tools built by Pulse Lab Kampala & partners are used to achieve and monitor SDGs localization 1.2.1 Number of tools built by the Lab to use real time data to achieve and monitor SDG localization. 1.2.2 Number of tools built by the Lab to use real time data to achieve and monitor SDG localization. Output 1. Ecosystem enabled by Pulse Lab Kampala for development and adoption of data innovations with big data and real-time analytics to achieve and monitor SDGs localization. 1.1.1 One (1) Private sector company joined the “data philanthropy” movement 1.1.2 Zero (0) Government counterparts adopted real time analytics for SDGs achievement and monitoring 1.1.3 Zero (0) Use of data innovation to support UN Joint Programming and UN Convergence Areas 1.1.4 Two (2) Academia participated in data innovation for SDG projects Output 2. Tools built by Pulse Lab Kampala & partners are used to achieve and monitor SDGs localization 1.2.1 Zero (0) Tools built by the Lab to use real time data to achieve and monitor SDG localization. 1.2.2 One (1) tool built by the Lab to use real time data to achieve and monitor SDG localization. Output 1. Ecosystem enabled by Pulse Lab Kampala for development and adoption of data innovations with big data and real-time analytics to achieve and monitor SDGs localization. 1. 1. 1 No of Private sector companies join the “data philanthropy” movement . 1.1.2 No of Government counterparts adopt real time analytics for SDGs achievement and monitoring 1.1.3 Use of data innovation to support UN Joint Programming and UN Convergence Areas 1.1.4 Participation of the Academia on data innovation for SDG projects Output 2. Tools built by Pulse Lab Kampala & partners are used to achieve and monitor SDGs localization 1.2.1 Number of tools built by the Lab to use real time data to achieve and monitor SDG localization. 1.2.2 Number of tools built by the Lab to use real time data to achieve and monitor SDG localization. Output 1. Ecosystem enabled by Pulse Lab Kampala for development and adoption of data innovations with big data and real-time analytics to achieve and monitor SDGs localization. 1.1.1 One (1) Private sector company joined the “data philanthropy” movement 1.1.2 Zero (0) Government counterparts adopted real time analytics for SDGs achievement and monitoring 1.1.3 Zero (0) Use of data innovation to support UN Joint Programming and UN Convergence Areas 1.1.4 Two (2) Academia participated in data innovation for SDG projects Output 2. Tools built by Pulse Lab Kampala & partners are used to achieve and monitor SDGs localization 1.2.1 Zero (0) Tools built by the Lab to use real time data to achieve and monitor SDG localization. 1.2.2 One (1) tool built by the Lab to use real time data to achieve and monitor SDG localization. Targets for 2022 1.1 The number and types of organisations, institutions and private sector companies that participate in the dialogues, meetings and workshops with the partners in regards to regulatory frameworks 1.2 The number of governments in the region that have instituted legal frameworks for responsible reuse of big data for social impact 1.3 Number of private sector companies in target industries allowing reuse in the region. 1.4 Number of applications and methodology developed and tested at large scale with partners for automatic identification and counting of roofs to monitor SDG1. 1.5 Number of results of large scale projects published and showcased at national and international forums where national bureaus of statistics are the primary target audience. 1.6 Number of organizations, institutions and private sector companies form the region that benefit from briefings, brainstorming sessions and workshops conducted by Pulse Lab Kampala on the use of data innovation and big data for the SDGs linked to their mandate. 1.7 Number and type of presentations delivered in conferences and contributions to reports and knowledge products by Pulse Lab Kampala where participation and contribution serves to advance leveraging big data and analytics techniques for the SDGs. 1.8 Number of Universities and private sector companies that join the Data Science Africa initiative Pulse Lab Kampala (PLK) , in collaboration with United Nations Global Pulse (UNGP) New York (which is receiving the support of Hewlett and GIZ) and sometimes partnering with others have supported a number of frameworks these include: 1) the Developing Framework for Ethical Artificial Intelligence (AI) roadmap and the Developing Community-Centric Data Exchanges roadmap for Uganda and Ghana. 2) the report by the National Taskforce on National Strategy on the Fourth Industrial revolution for Uganda 3) joined Smart Africa’s new data governance working group that is tasked with developing a continental data governance framework blueprint. 4) joined the AU Artificial intelligence (AI) team developing the AU AI Continental Strategy. A great number of companies now understand the need to share data for social good, especially through the engagements around the data exchange platform that discuss data governance issues, incentives, and technical capabilities required in the platform. In the next one year, we hope to see continued sharing of data in the data exchange. The work around the data exchange and the joined Smart Africa’s new data governance working group that is tasked with developing a continental data governance framework blueprint, but also other engagements around the data strategy, ethics of AI and AU AI continental strategy will all enable the smooth adoption of big data for official statistics. The role that PLK will play in the UN joint programme will also increase the chances of making this a reality. Engagements with National statistics offices continue, laying firm ground for adoption of large-scale projects. During this grant period Pulse Lab Kampala (PLK) worked with other institutions to organize Data Science Africa (DSA) 2022 Arusha, Tanzania event. This event attracted more than 120 participants drawn from academia, private sector, governments, civil society and international organisations including the UN. These are drawn from more than 18 countries in Africa and more than 5 outside Africa. These events are presentations on leveraging big data and analytics by PLK or its partners. The number of Universities participating in these events have grown to 40 in total and more than 17 for the private sector. The local chapter - Data Science Africa Uganda has enabled local Universities in Uganda to have never had a chance of participating in Data Science Africa (DSA) events to participate. In addition to events of Data Science Africa (DSA), PLK has organized workshops to support the data exchange and ethical AI road map and the data exchange platform in support of the tourism sector. Partnerships consolidated between the Lab and Government, UN Agencies, Private sector and Academia to advance SDGs localization with big data and real time analytics. Data innovation projects completed probing the value of Big Data combined with other types of data to achieve and monitor SDGs. XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00092215 United Nations Development Programme The peace security and Systems Resilience Programme addresses persistent security challenges that could threaten national/regional peace and social cohesion and ultimately increase vulnerability of communities. UGA Min of Inte Affairs UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME KOREA INTERN. COOPERATION AGENCY Peacebuilding Fund UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00115057 United Nations Development Programme Uganda Host and Refugee Community Empowerment to STRENGTHEN SOCIO-ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS IN UGANDA’S REFUGEE HOSTING COMMUNITIES THROUGH UNDP’S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MODEL. UGA Min of Inte Affairs UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME KOREA INTERN. COOPERATION AGENCY registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Yumbe District second-order administrative division 3.523540 31.282430 Building resilience 0 255525 1704471 1562191 2545933 1743990 467326 38521 United Nations Development Programme 311 United Nations Development Programme 311 United Nations Development Programme 311 United Nations Development Programme 30954 United Nations Development Programme -17748 United Nations Development Programme 311 United Nations Development Programme 311 United Nations Development Programme 311 United Nations Development Programme 311 United Nations Development Programme 311 United Nations Development Programme 311 United Nations Development Programme 311 United Nations Development Programme 1946 United Nations Development Programme 1659 United Nations Development Programme 41840 United Nations Development Programme 6409 United Nations Development Programme 468 United Nations Development Programme 138008 United Nations Development Programme 364 United Nations Development Programme 107448 United Nations Development Programme 7593 United Nations Development Programme 18922 United Nations Development Programme 72763 United Nations Development Programme 176470 United Nations Development Programme 47501 United Nations Development Programme 380085 United Nations Development Programme 24965 United Nations Development Programme 290948 United Nations Development Programme 188518 United Nations Development Programme 25605 United Nations Development Programme 28379 United Nations Development Programme 180714 United Nations Development Programme 24431 United Nations Development Programme 87124 United Nations Development Programme 311 United Nations Development Programme 1633450 United Nations Development Programme 2194446 United Nations Development Programme 1731569 United Nations Development Programme 184697 United Nations Development Programme 6718400 KOREA INTERN. COOPERATION AGENCY United Nations Development Programme 7609114 UGA Min of Inte Affairs Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Objective: To improve the socio-empowerment of communities with an emphasis on women and youth in refugee hosting communities (of Adjumani, Lwamwo and Moyo Districts). Objective Indicator 1: Persons in the refugee-hosting areas benefiting from livelihood opportunities (%), disaggregated by age and gender. Objective Indicator 2: Persons in refugee-hosting areas who are members of village savings and loans associations (number) disaggregated by gender and age. Objective Indicator 3: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years who make their own informed decisions regarding sexual relations, contraceptive use and reproductive health care. Outcome 1: Socio-economic gender equality in the context of livelihood improved. Indicator: 1.1: Proportion of time spent on unpaid and domestic care work by sex, age and location. Indicator 1.2: % of women in target communities with access to and control over land and other resources. Outcome 2: Enhanced capacities for mainstreaming gender equity/GBV prevention among key sub-national government agencies, communities, livelihood actors and private sector. Indicator 2.1: Number of project, policy publications and training manuals published Indicator 2.2: Proportion of women and girls aged 15 years and above who experienced physical, sexual or psychological violence by current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by form of violence and age. Indicator 2.3: % of young men who condemn GBV Indicator 2.4: Number or % of child marriages within refugee and host communities. Output 1: Strengthen economic capacities of women in refugees and host communities through livelihood opportunities Indicator: 1.1: Number of beneficiaries for cash for work disaggregated by gender and age Indicator 1.2: Number of jobs/livelihood opportunities created disaggregated by gender and age Indicator 1.3: Number of participants to micro-enterprise training disaggregated by gender and age. Indicator 1.4: Number of beneficiaries and times for sh Objective: To improve the socio-empowerment of communities with an emphasis on women and youth in refugee hosting communities (of Adjumani, Lwamwo and Moyo Districts). Objective Indicator 1: Persons in the refugee-hosting areas benefiting from livelihood opportunities (%), disaggregated by age and gender. Baseline: Zero (0) Year: (2018) Objective Indicator 2: Persons in refugee-hosting areas who are members of village savings and loans associations (number) disaggregated by gender and age. Baseline: Zero (0) Year: (2018) Objective Indicator 3: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years who make their own informed decisions regarding sexual relations, contraceptive use and reproductive health care. Baseline: Zero (0) Year (2018) Outcome 1: Socio-economic gender equality in the context of livelihood improved. Indicator: 1.1: Proportion of time spent on unpaid and domestic care work by sex, age and location. Baseline: TBD Indicator 1.2: % of women in target communities with access to and control over land and other resources. Baseline: Zero (0) 2018 Outcome 2: Enhanced capacities for mainstreaming gender equity/GBV prevention among key sub-national government agencies, communities, livelihood actors and private sector. Indicator 2.1: Number of project, policy publications and training manuals published Baseline: Zero (0) Year : 2018 Indicator 2.2: Proportion of women and girls aged 15 years and above who experienced physical, sexual or psychological violence by current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by form of violence and age. Baseline: TBD Year 2018 Indicator 2.3: % of young men who condemn GBV Baseline: TBD Year: 2018 Indicator 2.4: Number or % of child marriages within refugee and host communities. Baseline: TBD Year: 2018 Output 1: Strengthen economic capacities of women in refugees and host communities through livelihood opportunities Indicator: 1.1: Number of beneficiaries for cash for work disaggregated by gender and age Basel Objective: To improve the socio-empowerment of communities with an emphasis on women and youth in refugee hosting communities (of Adjumani, Lwamwo and Moyo Districts). Objective Indicator 1: Persons in the refugee-hosting areas benefitting from livelihood opportunities (%), disaggregated by age and gender. Target: 50% Objective Indicator 2: Persons in refugee-hosting areas who are members of village savings and loans associations (number) disaggregated by gender and age. Target: Three Thousand Six Hundred (3600) Objective Indicator 3: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years who make their own informed decisions regarding sexual relations, contraceptive use and reproductive health care. Target: 50% Outcome 1: Socio-economic gender equality in the context of livelihood improved. Outcome Indicator: 1.1: Proportion of time spent on unpaid and domestic care work by sex, age and location. Target: TBD Indicator 1.2: % of women in target communities with access to and control over land and other resources. Target: 25% Outcome 2: Enhanced capacities for mainstreaming gender equity/GBV prevention among key sub-national government agencies, communities, livelihood actors and private sector. Indicator 2.1: Number of project, policy publications and training manuals published Target: Target: Project policy publications training manuals published. Indicator:Indicator 2.2: Proportion of women and girls aged 15 years and above who experienced physical, sexual or psychological violence by current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by form of violence and age. Target: TBD Indicator 2.3: % of young men who condemn GBV. Target: TBD Indicator 2.4: Number or % of child marriages within refugee and host communities. Target: TBD Output 1: Strengthen economic capacities of women in refugees and host communities through livelihood opportunities Indicator: 1.1: Number of beneficiaries for cash for work disaggregated by gender and age Target: Seven Thousand One Hundred (7100) Indicator 1.2: Number of jobs/livelihood opportunities created disaggregated by gender and age Target: Three Thousand Six Hundred (3600) Indicator 1.3: Number of participants to micro-enterprise training disaggregated by gender and age. Target: 7100 Indicator 1.4: Number of beneficiaries and times for short-term and long-term vocational training disaggregated by gender. Target: Sen Thousand One Hundred (7100) Indicator 1.5: Number of target women with improved access to basic socio-economic services for women and girls (Health, education, markets, water, child care) Target: One Thousand (1000) Indicator 1.6: Completion rate of market formulation (Construction Schemes) Target: 100% (3 markets completed) Output 2: Capacity development of district –level officers, livelihood actors and targeted communities to strengthen gender transformative programming. Indicator 2.1: Total number of district –level agriculture, production, commercial, planners and community development officers completing gender related trainings disaggregated by gender. Target: One Hundred Fifty (150) Indicator 2.2: Number of plans of district local government with budgets and investments that directly promote gender equity and address SGBV issues (Technocrat). Target: Tw0 (2) Indicator 2.3: Number of participants with skills in the GBV/prevention disaggregated by sex and skill. Target: GBV - 100 Indicator 2.4: Existence of violence prevention and or education program Target: Partial Indicator 2.5: Number of CSOs supported on protecting women’s human rights, women’s economic empowerment and peace building, inclusive and equitable local area development. Target: Five (5) 1. 37.5% (2,700) Persons in the Refugee hosting areas benefited from livelihood opportunities 2. 2,700 people in Refugee-hosting areas were members of village savings and Loans Associations 3. 13.2% (1,670) women aged 15-49 years were able to make their own informed decisions regarding sexual relations, contraceptives use and reproductive health care Objective: To improve the socio-empowerment of communities with an emphasis on women and youth in refugee hosting communities (of Adjumani, Lwamwo and Moyo Districts). Objective Indicator 1: Persons in the refugee-hosting areas benefitting from livelihood opportunities (%), disaggregated by age and gender. Target: 75% Objective Indicator 2: Persons in refugee-hosting areas who are members of village savings and loans associations (number) disaggregated by gender and age. Target: Five Thousand Four Hundred (5400) Objective Indicator 3: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years who make their own informed decisions regarding sexual relations, contraceptive use and reproductive health care. Target 75% Outcome 1: Socio-economic gender equality in the context of livelihood improved. Outcome Indicator: 1.1: Proportion of time spent on unpaid and domestic care work by sex, age and location. Target: TBD Indicator 1.2: % of women in target communities with access to and control over land and other resources. Target: 30% Outcome 2: Enhanced capacities for mainstreaming gender equity/GBV prevention among key sub-national government agencies, communities, livelihood actors and private sector. Indicator 2.1: Number of project, policy publications and training manuals published Target: Target: Project policy publications training manuals published. Indicator:Indicator 2.2: Proportion of women and girls aged 15 years and above who experienced physical, sexual or psychological violence by current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by form of violence and age. Target: TBD Indicator 2.3: % of young men who condemn GBV Target: TBD Indicator 2.4: Number or % of child marriages within refugee and host communities. Target: TBD Output 1: Strengthen economic capacities of women in refugees and host communities through livelihood opportunities Indicator: 1.1: Number of beneficiaries for cash for work disaggregated by gender and age Target: Eight Thousand Nine Hundred (8900) Indicator 1.2: Number of jobs/livelihood opportunities created disaggregated by gender and age. Target: Five Thousand Four Hundred (5400) Indicator 1.3: Number of participants to micro-enterprise training disaggregated by gender and age. Target: 9800 Indicator 1.4: Number of beneficiaries and times for short-term and long-term vocational training disaggregated by gender. Target: Eight Thousand Nine hundred (8900) Indicator 1.5: Number of target women with improved access to basic socio-economic services for women and girls (Health, education, markets, water, child care) Target: One Thousand Five Hundred (1500) Indicator 1.6: Completion rate of market formulation (Construction Schemes) Target: Market already completed in 2020 Output 2: Capacity development of district –level officers, livelihood actors and targeted communities to strengthen gender transformative programming. Indicator 2.1: Total number of district –level agriculture, production, commercial, planners and community development officers completing gender related trainings disaggregated by gender. Target : 150 Already completed in 2020 Indicator 2.2: Number of plans of district local government with budgets and investments that directly promote gender equity and address SGBV issues (Technocrat) Target: Two (2) Indicator 2.3: Number of participants with skills in the GBV/prevention disaggregated by sex and skill. Target: 100 completed in 2020 Indicator 2.4: Existence of violence prevention and or education program Target: Fully Indicator 2.5: Number of CSOs supported on protecting women’s human rights, women’s economic empowerment and peace building, inclusive and equitable local area development. Target: Ten (10) 1. 37.5% (8,700) Persons in the Refugee hosting areas benefited from livelihood opportunities 2. 8,700 people in Refugee-hosting areas were members of village savings and Loans Associations 3. 72.5% (5,220) women aged 15-49 years were able to make their own informed decisions regarding sexual relations, contraceptives use and reproductive health care Objective: To improve the socio-empowerment of communities with an emphasis on women and youth in refugee hosting communities (of Adjumani, Lwamwo and Moyo Districts). Objective Indicator 1: Persons in the refugee-hosting areas benefiting from livelihood opportunities (%), disaggregated by age and gender. Target: 100% Objective Indicator 2: Persons in refugee-hosting areas who are members of village savings and loans associations (number) disaggregated by gender and age. Target: Seven Thousand Two Hundred (7200) Objective Indicator 3: Proportion of women aged 15-49 years who make their own informed decisions regarding sexual relations, contraceptive use and reproductive health care. Target: 100% Outcome 1: Socio-economic gender equality in the context of livelihood improved. Outcome Indicator: 1.1: Proportion of time spent on unpaid and domestic care work by sex, age and location. Target: TBD Indicator 1.2: % of women in target communities with access to and control over land and other resources. Target: 35% Outcome 2: Enhanced capacities for mainstreaming gender equity/GBV prevention among key sub-national government agencies, communities, livelihood actors and private sector. Indicator 2.1: Number of project, policy publications and training manuals published. Target: Project policy publications training manuals published. Indicator 2.2: Proportion of women and girls aged 15 years and above who experienced physical, sexual or psychological violence by current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by form of violence and age. Target: TBD Indicator 2.3: % of young men who condemn GBV Target: TBD Indicator 2.4: Number or % of child marriages within refugee and host communities. Target: TBD Output 1: Strengthen economic capacities of women in refugees and host communities through livelihood opportunities Indicator: 1.1: Number of beneficiaries for cash for work disaggregated by gender and age Target 1.1: Ten Thousand Seven Hundred (10,700) Indicator 1.2: Number of jobs/livelihood opportunities created disaggregated by gender and age Target: Seven Thousand Two Hundred (7200) Indicator 1.3: Number of participants to micro-enterprise training disaggregated by gender and age. Target: 10,700 Indicator 1.4: Number of beneficiaries and times for short-term and long-term vocational training disaggregated by gender. Target: Ten Thousand Seven Hundred (10,700) Indicator 1.5: Number of target women with improved access to basic socio-economic services for women and girls (Health, education, markets, water, child care) Target: Two Thousand (2000) Indicator 1.6: Completion rate of market formulation (Construction Schemes) Target: 100% Output 2: Capacity development of district –level officers, livelihood actors and targeted communities to strengthen gender transformative programming. Indicator 2.1: Total number of district –level agriculture, production, commercial, planners and community development officers completing gender related trainings disaggregated by gender. Target: One hundred Fifty (150) Indicator 2.2: Number of plans of district local government with budgets and investments that directly promote gender equity and address SGBV issues (Technocrat) Target: Three (3) Indicator 2.3: Number of participants with skills in the GBV/prevention disaggregated by sex and skill. Target: One Hundred (100) GBV Indicator 2.4: Existence of violence prevention and or education program Target: Fully Indicator 2.5: Number of CSOs supported on protecting women’s human rights, women’s economic empowerment and peace building, inclusive and equitable local area development. Target:Fifteen (15) Objective: To improve the socio-empowerment of communities with an emphasis on women and youth in refugee hosting communities (of Adjumani, Lwamwo and Moyo Districts). Result for objective indicator target 1: 100% target attained of persons in the refugee-hosting areas benefiting from livelihood opportunities. Result for objective Indicator target 2: 10,137 Persons in refugee-hosting areas are members of village savings and loans associations. Outcome one results Result for outcome indicator target 1.1: 100% (Proportion of time spent on unpaid and domestic care work by sex, age and location). Result for outcome indicator target 1.2: 28.5 out of 35 % of women in target communities with access to and control over land and other resources. Results attained under outcome 2 Result for outcome indicator target 2.1: Three (3) out of 7 Project policy publications training manuals published. Result for outcome indicator target 2.2: 20.9 out of 40 % Proportion of women and girls aged 15 years and above who experienced physical, sexual or psychological violence by current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months. Result for outcome indicator target 2.3: 75.2% of young men who condemn GBV. Result for outcome indicator target 2.4: 17.4% of child marriages within refugee and host communities. Results attained under output 1: Results for output indicator target 1.1: 10,137 out of 10,700 beneficiaries reached for cash for work disaggregated by gender and age. Results for output indicator target 1.2: 3,215 out of 5000 jobs/livelihood opportunities created disaggregated by gender and age. Results for output indicator target 1.3: 3,884 out of 5400 participants to micro-enterprise training disaggregated by gender and age Results for output indicator target 1.4: 3,374 out of 2000 (168.7%) of beneficiaries and times for short-term and long-term vocational training disaggregated by gender. Results for output indicator target 1.6: 28.5% Completion rate of market formulation (Construction Schemes). Results attained under output 2 Results for output indicator target 2.1: 117 out of 150 of district –level agriculture, production, commercial, planners and community development officers completing gender related trainings disaggregated by gender. Results for output indicator target 2.2: Three (3) plans of district local government with budgets and investments that directly promote gender equity and address SGBV issues (Technocrat). Results for output indicator target 2.3: 117participants with skills in the GBV/prevention disaggregated by sex and skill. Results for output indicator target 2.5 Twelve (12 of CSOs) supported on protecting women’s human rights, women’s economic empowerment and peace building, inclusive and equitable local area development. Proportion of time spent on un-paid and domestic and care work by sex, age, location. % of women in target communities with access to and control over land and other resources Number of Project, policy publications, training manuals published Number of beneficiaries for cash for work disaggregated by gender, age, disability, and location Number of cases/beneficiaries that are supported to start or continue the micro-enterprise, disaggregated by gender and age Number of target women headed households with improved access to basic socio-economic services for women and girls (health, education, Number of beneficiaries and Sessions for short term and long term vocational and micro-enterprise training, disaggregated by gender, age, disability, and location Completion rate of market formulation (construction schemes) ▪ Market assessment (33% = primary assessment 16% + main assessment 17% ) ▪ Market accessibility and facility improvement (33% = road construction 13% + market facility construction 20%), ▪ Market value chain building and activation (34%) Proportion of women and girls aged 15 years and above who experience physical, sexual or psychological violence by current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by form of violence and age Percentage of young men who condemn GBV Number (or %) of child marriages within refugee and host communities Total number of district-level agriculture, production, commercial, planners and community development officers completed gender related trainings disaggregated by gender Number of plans of district local government with budgets and investments that directly promote gender equity and address SGBV issue (technocrat) Number of participants with skills in the GBV/ prevention disaggregated by sex and skill Existence of violence prevention and or education program None Fully Functioning Fully developed and functional Number of CSOs supported on protecting women’s human rights, women’s economic empowerment, and peace building & inclusive and equitable local area development XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00118580 United Nations Development Programme Harnessing the Youths Potential for Sustaining Peace in Uganda to support the IfP by ensuring greater inclusion of young women and men in these mechanisms UGA Min of Inte Affairs Peacebuilding Fund registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity National 0.316280 32.582190 Eradicate poverty in all its forms and dimensions 0 276 836354 714592 100 30 United Nations Development Programme 13213 United Nations Development Programme 828843 United Nations Development Programme 670026 United Nations Development Programme 1551500 Peacebuilding Fund United Nations Development Programme 1512082 UGA Min of Inte Affairs Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). 1. Number of districts that undertake consultations with youth 2. Number of youth leaders trained 3. Number of forums promoting youth leadership and peace building 4. Percentage of youth represented at the national peace building platforms dis-aggregated by sex. 5. Number of policy dialogues held 6. Number of young people reached with peace building information dis-aggregated by gender and age 7. Number of radio presenters engaged/trained 1. (0) Number of districts that undertake consultations with youth 2. (0) Number of youth leaders trained 3. (0) Number of forums promoting youth leadership and peace building 4. (0) Percentage of youth represented at the national peace building platforms dis-aggregated by sex. 5. (0) Number of policy dialogues held 6. (0) Number of young people reached with peace building information dis-aggregated by gender and age 7. (0) Number of radio presenters engaged/trained 1. Three (3) districts undertake consultations with youth 2. Sixty (60) youth leaders trained 3. Twenty (20) forums promoting youth leadership and peace building conducted 4. Three (3) percent of youth represented at the national peace building platforms dis-aggregated by sex. 5. Number of policy dialogues held 6. Number of young people reached with peace building information dis-aggregated by gender and age 7. #4 radio presenters engaged/trained 1. Three (3) districts undertook consultations with youth 2. One hundred and thirteen (113) youth leaders trained 3. Eight (8) forums promoting youth leadership and peace building conducted 4. Three (3) percent of youth represented at the national peace building platforms dis-aggregated by sex 5. Zero (0) policy dialogues held 6. 27,618 people reached with peace building information dis-aggregated by gender and age 7. 75 radio presenters engaged/trained 1. Three (3) districts undertake consultations with youth 2. Sixty (60) youth leaders trained 3. Twenty (20) forums promoting youth leadership and peace building conducted 4. Three (3) percent of youth represented at the national peace building platforms dis-aggregated by sex. 5. Number of policy dialogues held 6. Number of young people reached with peace building information dis-aggregated by gender and age 7. #4 radio presenters engaged/trained 1. Three (3) districts undertook consultations with youth 2. One hundred and thirteen (113) youth leaders trained 3. Eight (8) forums promoting youth leadership and peace building conducted 4. Three (3) percent of youth represented at the national peace building platforms dis-aggregated by sex 5. Zero (0) policy dialogues held 6. 27,618 people reached with peace building information dis-aggregated by gender and age 7. 75 radio presenters engaged/trained XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00126728 United Nations Development Programme Building Resilient Refugees and Host Communities. Uganda continues to host the largest refugee population in Africa with over 1,423 million refugees displaced by conflicts in the neighboring countries. UGA Min of Inte Affairs GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Gulu District second-order administrative division 2.856040 32.430010 Building resilience Global COVID-19 20821 4181 34056 267382 607568 -396 United Nations Development Programme -295 United Nations Development Programme 321 United Nations Development Programme 321 United Nations Development Programme 321 United Nations Development Programme 444 United Nations Development Programme 3880 United Nations Development Programme 660 United Nations Development Programme -20 United Nations Development Programme 641 United Nations Development Programme 641 United Nations Development Programme 321 United Nations Development Programme 321 United Nations Development Programme 321 United Nations Development Programme 4503 United Nations Development Programme 424 United Nations Development Programme 23779 United Nations Development Programme 641 United Nations Development Programme 205 United Nations Development Programme 641 United Nations Development Programme 962 United Nations Development Programme 321 United Nations Development Programme 321 United Nations Development Programme 321 United Nations Development Programme 460954 United Nations Development Programme 349593 United Nations Development Programme 871014 UGA Min of Inte Affairs Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Output 1: Sustainable and green livelihood opportunities expanded for refugees and host communities in West Nile (Adjumani and Obongi districts) for environmental conservation Output Indicator: 1.1.# of refugees and host communities’ individuals (60% women) engaged in environmentally friendly livelihood activities. Output Indicator 1.2. # of refugees and host communities’ households trained in environmental management practices. Output 2: Capacities of targeted District Local Governments are strengthened to implement the CRRF sector plans, COVID-19 response and recovery plans. Indicator 2.1: # of District Local Governments who receive capacity building to effective respond to and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 Indicator 2.2: # of Districts with capacities built to respond to COVID 19 Indicator 2.3: # of Key District Local Government staff with capacities (inclusive of refugee welfare committees) strengthened to respond to shocks and pandemics. Output 3: Peaceful co-existence among refugee and host communities enhanced. Indicator: 3.1. Number of peace education campaigns conducted to promote social cohesion, including facilitating inter-cultural dialogue for peace among refugees and host communities. Indicator 3.2. Number of inter-cultural dialogues conducted. Output 1: Sustainable and green livelihood opportunities expanded for refugees and host communities in West Nile (Adjumani and Obongi districts) for environmental conservation Output Indicator 1.1: # of refugees and host communities’ individuals (60% women) engaged in environmentally friendly livelihood activities. Baseline: Zero (0) 2020 Output Indicator 1.2. # of refugees and host communities’ households trained in environmental management practices. Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2020 Output 2: Capacities of targeted District Local Governments are strengthened to implement the CRRF sector plans, COVID-19 response and recovery plans. Indicator 2.1: # of District Local Governments who receive capacity building to effective respond to and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 Baseline: Zero (0) 2020 Indicator 2.2: # of Districts with capacities built to respond to COVID 19 Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2020 Indicator 2.3: # of Key District Local Government staff with capacities (inclusive of refugee welfare committees) strengthened to respond to shocks and pandemics. Baseline: Zero (0) Output 3: Peaceful co-existence among refugee and host communities enhanced. Indicator: 3.1. Number of peace education campaigns conducted to promote social cohesion, including facilitating inter-cultural dialogue for peace among refugees and host communities. Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2020 Indicator 3.2. Number of inter-cultural dialogues conducted. Baseline: Zero (0) N/A - This is Baseline Years since project started in 2021 N/A Output 1: Sustainable and green livelihood opportunities expanded for refugees and host communities in West Nile (Adjumani and Obongi districts) for environmental conservation Indicator 1.1: Number of refugees and host communities’ individuals (60% women) have engaged in environmentally friendly livelihood activities Target: One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty (1,320) Indicator: 1.2. Number of refugees and host communities’ households are trained in environmental management practices. Target: One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty (1,320) Output 2: Capacities of targeted District Local Governments are strengthened to implement the CRRF sector plans, COVID-19 response and recovery plans. Indicator: 2.1 # of District Local Governments who receive capacity building to effective respond to and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 Target: 2(Obongi/Adjuman) Indicator 2.2: # of Districts with capacities built to respond to COVID 19 Target: Two (2) Indicator 2.3: # of Key District Local Government staff with capacities (inclusive of refugee welfare committees) strengthened to respond to shocks and pandemics. Target: Thirty (30) Indicator 3.1. Number of peace education campaigns conducted to promote social cohesion, including facilitating inter-cultural dialogue for peace among refugees and host communities. Target: Twenty (20) Indicator 3.2: Number of inter-cultural dialogues conducted Target: Fifty (50) Output 3: Peaceful co-existence among refugee and host communities enhanced 1. 1,320 refugees and host communities’ individuals (60% women) have engaged in environmentally friendly livelihood activities 2. 1,320 refugees and host communities’ households are trained in environmental management practices. 3.Two District Local Governments of Obongi and Adjumani receive capacity building to effective respond to and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 4.Two Districts with capacities built to respond to COVID 19 5. 102 Key District Local Government staff capacities and refugee welfare committees are strengthened to respond to shocks and pandemics 6. Three peace education for refugees and host communities and interventions to promote social cohesion conducted, including facilitating inter-cultural dialogue for peace among refugees and host communities. 7.Two peace building programs conducted and # inter-cultural dialogues and awareness raising campaigns conducted Output 1: Sustainable and green livelihood opportunities expanded for refugees and host communities in West Nile (Adjumani and Obongi districts) for environmental conservation Indicator 1.1: Number of refugees and host communities’ individuals (60% women) have engaged in environmentally friendly livelihood activities Target 1.1: One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty (1,320) Indicator 1.2: Number of refugees and host communities’ households are trained in environmental management practices. Target 1.2: One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty (1,320) Output 2: Capacities of targeted District Local Governments are strengthened to implement the CRRF sector plans, COVID-19 response and recovery plans. Indicator 2.1: # of District Local Governments who receive capacity building to effective respond to and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 Target 2.1: Two (2) District (Obongi and Adjumani) Indicator 2.2: # of Districts with capacities built to respond to COVID-19 Target 2.2: Two (2) Indicator 2.3: # of Key District Local Government staff with capacities (inclusive of refugee welfare committees) strengthened to respond to shocks and pandemics. Target 2.3: Thirty (30) Indicator 3.1. Number of peace education campaigns conducted to promote social cohesion, including facilitating inter-cultural dialogue for peace among refugees and host communities. Target 3.1: Twenty (20) Indicator 3.2: Number of inter-cultural dialogues conducted Target 3.2: Fifty (50) Output 3: Peaceful co-existence among refugee and host communities enhanced Results attained under output 1 Result for indicator target 1.1: 1,370 out of 1320 refugees and host communities’ individuals (60% women) have engaged in environmentally friendly livelihood activities. Result for indicator target 1.2: 1,320 refugees and host communities’ households are trained in environmental management practices. Output 2: Capacities of targeted District Local Governments are strengthened to implement the CRRF sector plans, COVID-19 response and recovery plans. Results attained under output 2 Result for indicator target 2.1: Two (2) District Local Governments received capacity building to effectively respond to and mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Result for indicator target 2.2:Two (2) Districts including Obongi and Adjumani had their capacities built to respond to COVID-19. Result for indicator target 2.3: Fourty (40) Key District Local Government staff with capacities (inclusive of refugee welfare committees) strengthened to respond to shocks and pandemics. Results attained under output 3 Result for indicator target 3.1: 40 out of 20 (200%) peace education campaigns conducted to promote social cohesion, including facilitating inter-cultural dialogue for peace among refugees and host communities. Number of peace building programs conducted and # inter-cultural dialogues and awareness raising campaigns conducted XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00092241 United Nations Development Programme Programme will focus on i) public sector policies & legal/regulatory frameworks for effective public sector management; ii) institutional transparency, accountability iii) Non-state Actor engagement to demand for accountability &transparency. UGA Office of the Prime Mster UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Undefined NOR - MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS KOREA INTERN. COOPERATION AGENCY HALYK BANK KAZAKHSTAN COMESA BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of MPTF-Joint SDG Fund MPTF-Spotlight Initiative Fund Austrian Development Agency UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES (UNHCR) INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS UNION GREEN CLIMATE FUND registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00097040 United Nations Development Programme The Institutional Effectiveness Programme will address three inter-related bottlenecks hindering institutional effectiveness, transparency and accountability in Uganda’s public sector, well analysed in UNDAF 2016-2020. UGA Office of the Prime Mster UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of HALYK BANK KAZAKHSTAN Undefined registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 0 37722 970241 559999 596000 626465 355465 -10 United Nations Development Programme 18 United Nations Development Programme 314015 United Nations Development Programme 644135 United Nations Development Programme 561535 United Nations Development Programme 510853 United Nations Development Programme 615094 United Nations Development Programme 246596 United Nations Development Programme 2892246 UGA Office of the Prime Mster Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Output 1: Selected Ministries, Department and Agencies /sectors effectively coordinate and implement targeted public sector reforms by 2020 1.3.1.1: No. of MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.2.1.2 No. of new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) 1.3.1.3 Existence of strategic functional management information system informing policy direction Output 2: By the end of 2020 targeted accountability institutions (MDAs, CSOs and media) uphold and reinforce standards of accountability, transparency and integrity 1.3.2.1: Existence of service delivery standards for key extractives and infrastructure (housing and roads) sectors: 1.3.2.2: No. of CSOs that are QUAM certified and participate in ensuring compliance with national standards; 1.3.2.3: % of targeted MDAs effectively monitoring (complying with) implementation of the ‘Leadership Code’; 1.3.2.4: No. of accountability institutions with functional mechanisms for detection, prevention and redress of corruption Output 1: Selected Ministries, Department and Agencies /sectors effectively coordinate and implement targeted public sector reforms by 2020 1.3.1.1: 1 (2013) MDAs/ LGs developing and implementing strategic development plan and framework and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: Zero (2014) new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) 1.3.1.3: No (2013) existence of strategic functional management information system informing Output 2 By the end of 2020 targeted accountability institutions (MDAs, CSOs and media) uphold and reinforce standards of accountability, transparency and integrity 1.3.2.1:No (2014) service delivery standards for key extractives and infrastructure (housing and roads) sectors: 1.3.2.2: 76 (2013) CSOs are QUAM certified and participate in ensuring compliance with national standards; 1.3.2.3 0% (2013) of targeted MDAs effectively monitoring (complying with) implementation of the ‘Leadership Code’ 1.3.2.4 No (2013) accountability institutions with functional mechanisms for detection, prevention and redress of corruption Output 1: Selected Ministries, Department and Agencies /sectors effectively coordinate and implement targeted public sector reforms INDICATORS: 1.3.1.1: No. MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: No. of new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) Target: 1.3.1.1: 4 MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: 3 new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) Output 1: Selected Ministries, Department and Agencies /sectors effectively coordinate and implement targeted public sector reforms by 2020 1.3.1.1: 5 MDAs and LGs developed and implemented strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: 4 new PPPs under local economic development have provided innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) Output 1: Selected Ministries, Department and Agencies /sectors effectively coordinate and implement targeted public sector reforms INDICATORS: 1.3.1.1: No. MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: No. of new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) Target: 1.3.1.1: 4 MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: 3 new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) Output 1: Selected Ministries, Department and Agencies /sectors effectively coordinate and implement targeted public sector reforms INDICATORS: 1.3.1.1: No. MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: No. of new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) Target: 1.3.1.1: 4 MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: 3 new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) Output 1: Selected Ministries, Department and Agencies /sectors effectively coordinate and implement targeted public sector reforms INDICATORS: 1.3.1.1: No. MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: No. of new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) Target: 1.3.1.1: 4 MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: 3 new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) 1.3.1.1: No. MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: No. of new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) Target: 1.3.1.1: 4 MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 1.3.1.2: 3 new PPPs providing innovative solutions for development : (IRRF 7.6.1) XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00105911 United Nations Development Programme Direct Project Costing, Effectiveness of Development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation Project UGA Office of the Prime Mster GREEN CLIMATE FUND INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS UNION UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES (UNHCR) UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Joint SDG Fund BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION KOREA INTERN. COOPERATION AGENCY registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 3392898 2866398 2219868 3258109 3692770 6201269 3354280 2736382 2461189 1807675 33797 United Nations Development Programme 221530 United Nations Development Programme 438841 United Nations Development Programme 221918 United Nations Development Programme 227445 United Nations Development Programme 219139 United Nations Development Programme 171655 United Nations Development Programme 361857 United Nations Development Programme 473741 United Nations Development Programme 149127 United Nations Development Programme 192755 United Nations Development Programme 242054 United Nations Development Programme 155132 United Nations Development Programme 133859 United Nations Development Programme 249698 United Nations Development Programme 171127 United Nations Development Programme 168169 United Nations Development Programme 193444 United Nations Development Programme 308886 United Nations Development Programme 207458 United Nations Development Programme 94501 United Nations Development Programme 106382 United Nations Development Programme 431711 United Nations Development Programme 71407 United Nations Development Programme 81701 United Nations Development Programme -62717 United Nations Development Programme 355203 United Nations Development Programme 188726 United Nations Development Programme 338883 United Nations Development Programme 923948 United Nations Development Programme 135705 United Nations Development Programme 284444 United Nations Development Programme 114421 United Nations Development Programme 69024 United Nations Development Programme 175515 United Nations Development Programme 180693 United Nations Development Programme 125287 United Nations Development Programme 17838 United Nations Development Programme 3560612 United Nations Development Programme 5045843 United Nations Development Programme 3348707 United Nations Development Programme 2297546 United Nations Development Programme 2271527 United Nations Development Programme 1763696 United Nations Development Programme 484814 MPTF-Joint SDG Fund United Nations Development Programme 29621198 UGA Office of the Prime Mster Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme. (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing. (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE). Number of staff benefiting from DPC. Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place. 2) Number of staff with skills and knowledge in target areas. 3) Annual NIM audit report in place. 4) Number of HACT micro-assessment reports. 5) A functional aid management platform. 6) UNDP Annual Report in place. 7) Up-to-date website in place. 8) Updated corporate brochure in place. 9) Op-eds in place. 10) Video blogs in place. 11).Number of planned evaluations conducted = 3 evaluations Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: No. of MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 3.2. Number of diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme. (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing =$1,349,000 (2016) ,Project/Programme Documents/Project reports/AWPs (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE)=$0 (2016), Project/ Programme Documents/Project reports/AWPs Number of staff benefiting from DPC=45 (2016), Project/ Programme Documents/Project reports/AWPs Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place=A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place.(2014), 2) Number of staff with skills and knowledge in target areas=106 (2016), training report. 3) Annual NIM audit report in place=Annual NIM audit report (2015), Annual NIM audit report. 4) Number of HACT micro-assessment reports=26 (2016), HACT website. 5) A functional aid management platform=partial (2016), Sector reports. 6) UNDP Annual Report in place=UNDP annual report (2016), UNDP website. 7) Up-to-date website in place=UNDP website (2016), UNDP website. 8) Updated corporate brochure in place=Updated corporate brochure (2016), UNDP website. 9) Op-eds in place=Op-eds in place (2016), UNDP website. 10) Video blogs in place=video blogs(2016), UNDP website. 11) 5 of planned evaluations conducted = 3 evaluations Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: No. of MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities = 1 (2016), 3.2). 2 diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing = $1,100,900 (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) = $555,382 Number of staff benefiting from DPC.=50 Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place = 2 Reports on CPD portfolio performance for 2019 and that of 2020 2) 60 staff with skills and knowledge in target areas, UNDP staff and partner capacities enhanced 3) Annual NIM audit report in place = 1 annual NIM audit completed 4) 6 HACT micro-assessment reports completed= 6 HACT micro-assessment reports 5) A functional aid management platform in place = Fully 6) UNDP Annual Report in place = 1 UNDP Annual Report 7) Up-to-date website in place = Annual up-to-date website 8) Updated corporate brochure in place = 1 corporate brochure updated 9) Op-eds in place = 2 Op-eds published 10) Video blogs in place = 2 video blogs 11. 3 planned evaluations completed Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: 8 MDAs and 70 LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities 3.2 Three diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing = $1,100,900 (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) = $555,382 Number of staff benefiting from DPC.=50 Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place 2) 72 staff with skills and knowledge in target areas, UNDP staff and partner capacities enhanced 3) Annual NIM audit report in place = 1 annual NIM audit completed 4) 12 HACT micro-assessment reports completed= 12HACT micro-assessment reports 5) A functional aid management platform in place = Fully 6) UNDP Annual Report in place = 1 UNDP Annual Report 7) Up-to-date website in place = Annual up-to-date website 8) Updated corporate brochure in place = 1 corporate brochure updated 9) Op-eds in place = 3 Op-eds published 10) Video blogs in place = 3 video blogs 11. 3 planned evaluations completed Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: 8 MDAs and 70 LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities 3.2 Nine diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing = $1,100,900 (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) = $555,382 Number of staff benefiting from DPC.=50 Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place = 2 Reports on CPD portfolio performance for 2019 and that of 2020 2) 60 staff with skills and knowledge in target areas, UNDP staff and partner capacities enhanced 3) Annual NIM audit report in place = 1 annual NIM audit completed 4) 6 HACT micro-assessment reports completed= 6 HACT micro-assessment reports 5) A functional aid management platform in place = Fully 6) UNDP Annual Report in place = 1 UNDP Annual Report 7) Up-to-date website in place = Annual up-to-date website 8) Updated corporate brochure in place = 1 corporate brochure updated 9) Op-eds in place = 2 Op-eds published 10) Video blogs in place = 2 video blogs 11. 3 planned evaluations completed Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: 8 MDAs and 70 LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities 3.2 Three diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing = $1,100,900 (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) = $555,382 Number of staff benefiting from DPC.=50 Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place 2) 72 staff with skills and knowledge in target areas, UNDP staff and partner capacities enhanced 3) Annual NIM audit report in place = 1 annual NIM audit completed 4) 12 HACT micro-assessment reports completed= 12HACT micro-assessment reports 5) A functional aid management platform in place = Fully 6) UNDP Annual Report in place = 1 UNDP Annual Report 7) Up-to-date website in place = Annual up-to-date website 8) Updated corporate brochure in place = 1 corporate brochure updated 9) Op-eds in place = 3 Op-eds published 10) Video blogs in place = 3 video blogs 11. 3 planned evaluations completed Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: 8 MDAs and 70 LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities 3.2 Nine diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing = $1,100,900 (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) = $555,382 Number of staff benefiting from DPC.=50 Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place = 2 Reports on CPD portfolio performance for 2019 and that of 2020 2) 60 staff with skills and knowledge in target areas, UNDP staff and partner capacities enhanced 3) Annual NIM audit report in place = 1 annual NIM audit completed 4) 6 HACT micro-assessment reports completed= 6 HACT micro-assessment reports 5) A functional aid management platform in place = Fully 6) UNDP Annual Report in place = 1 UNDP Annual Report 7) Up-to-date website in place = Annual up-to-date website 8) Updated corporate brochure in place = 1 corporate brochure updated 9) Op-eds in place = 2 Op-eds published 10) Video blogs in place = 2 video blogs 11. 3 planned evaluations completed Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: 8 MDAs and 70 LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities 3.2 Three diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing = $1,100,900 (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) = $555,382 Number of staff benefiting from DPC.=50 Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place 2) 72 staff with skills and knowledge in target areas, UNDP staff and partner capacities enhanced 3) Annual NIM audit report in place = 1 annual NIM audit completed 4) 12 HACT micro-assessment reports completed= 12HACT micro-assessment reports 5) A functional aid management platform in place = Fully 6) UNDP Annual Report in place = 1 UNDP Annual Report 7) Up-to-date website in place = Annual up-to-date website 8) Updated corporate brochure in place = 1 corporate brochure updated 9) Op-eds in place = 3 Op-eds published 10) Video blogs in place = 3 video blogs 11. 3 planned evaluations completed Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: 8 MDAs and 70 LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities 3.2 Nine diagnostic studies published and disseminated A functional aid management platform UNDP annual report in place Op-eds in place No of MDAs & LGs developing and implementing strategic devt plans and frameworks complying with NDP III Strategic communication, advocacy and visibility of the CPD programme Position UNDP as a partner of choice and and thought leader in the fight against poverty, inclusion and SDGs Communicate UNDP's work and Achievements more effectively Enhance internal Communication and CO's ability to communicate, including effective mainstreaming of gender in CO communications XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00112214 United Nations Development Programme Spotlight Initiative Violence against women and children is one of the most widespread, persistent and devastating human rights violations in the world today. UGA Office of the Prime Mster UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Spotlight Initiative Fund registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Gulu Municipality third-order administrative division 2.782020 32.295710 Leaving no one behind Global COVID-19 333684 3009 882734 1771022 2391548 1775031 1133271 178872 15364 United Nations Development Programme 136044 United Nations Development Programme 230314 United Nations Development Programme 1062 United Nations Development Programme 7686 United Nations Development Programme 294 United Nations Development Programme 294 United Nations Development Programme 376 United Nations Development Programme 174 United Nations Development Programme 8139 United Nations Development Programme 294 United Nations Development Programme 294 United Nations Development Programme 294 United Nations Development Programme 294 United Nations Development Programme 294 United Nations Development Programme 580 United Nations Development Programme -4336 United Nations Development Programme 588 United Nations Development Programme 20 United Nations Development Programme 8261 United Nations Development Programme 290 United Nations Development Programme 1359 United Nations Development Programme -116226 United Nations Development Programme -94619 United Nations Development Programme 19616 United Nations Development Programme 51914 United Nations Development Programme 53444 United Nations Development Programme 228911 United Nations Development Programme 239690 United Nations Development Programme 86467 United Nations Development Programme 35982 United Nations Development Programme 19543 United Nations Development Programme 63831 United Nations Development Programme 7425 United Nations Development Programme 7180 United Nations Development Programme 1856470 United Nations Development Programme 2264657 United Nations Development Programme 1709680 United Nations Development Programme 768637 United Nations Development Programme 5630 United Nations Development Programme 1016000 MPTF-Spotlight Initiative Fund United Nations Development Programme 1147097 MPTF-Spotlight Initiative Fund United Nations Development Programme -150000 MPTF-Spotlight Initiative Fund United Nations Development Programme 2924687 MPTF-Spotlight Initiative Fund United Nations Development Programme 178872 MPTF-Spotlight Initiative Fund United Nations Development Programme 7557183 UGA Office of the Prime Mster Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). OUTCOME1 INDICATORS 1.2 Number of new and/or strengthened laws and/or policies on ending VAWG and/or gender equality and non-discrimination developed that are in line with Uganda' commitments at regional and international levels on human rights standards and respond to the right respond to the rights of women and girls, particularly vulnerable women and girls. INDICATORS FOR OUTCOME 2 2.1: Existence of a functioning national and/or sub-national coordination and oversight mechanisms at the highest level for addressing VAWG/VAC/HP and promoting SRHR, that includes representation from marginalized groups 2.2: Percentage of national budget being allocated to the prevention and elimination of all forms of VAWG/HP, by sector 2.1.1: Number of relevant MDAs and DLGs that develop strategies, plans and/or programmes to prevent and respond to VAWG, including SGBV/HP and promote women and girls’ SRHR, including for vulnerable women and girls. 2.1.5: Number of targeted national and sub-national training institutions for public servants that have integrated gender equality and VAWG, including SGBV/HP and the promotion of women and girls’ SRHR in their curriculum, as per international standards (pre and in-service) 2.2.1: There exists a national multi-stakeholder coordination mechanism established and/or strengthened composed of relevant stakeholders, with a clear mandate and governance structure and with annual work plans 2.3.3: No. of key government officials with greater knowledge, capacities and tools on gender-responsive budgeting to end VAWG, including SGBV/HP, and to promote women and girls’ SRHR 3.2.7: Number of women and girls benefitting from skilling and livelihood opportunities, by type 3.3.2: No. of relevant non-state institutions (media and work places) that have been supported to develop and/or strengthened strategies/policies on ending VAWG, including SGBV/HP and promoting gender-equitable norms, attitudes and behaviours and women and girls’ rights, 1.2: 10 laws in place that response to ending VAWG, gender equality and non discrimination 2.1: One coordination mechanism- The GBV Reference Group 2.2: No baseline 2.1: Zero (0) MDAs with strategies to address GBV interventions 2.1.5 No training institutions have integrated VAWG/HP and SRHR in their curriculum 2.2.1. 0 multi sector coordination mechanism. 1 GBV reference group in place however it it is not a multi sectoral and national in nature. No baseline data 3.2.7 0 Women and girls with skills and livelihood opportunities in Spotlight Districts 3.3.2 0 non state institutions supported to develop strategies, policies on ending VAWG 4.1.4 No baseline on government service providers with capacity to deliver quality 8survivor services 4.2.1 no baseline on number of GBV survivors with increased knowledge and access to quality survivor services 1.2.1 Advocacy for the passing of at-least 2 bills conducted (legal aid bill, Human Rights Enforcement Bill and Administration of Justice Bill) .2.1. Convene 1 high level multisectoral dialogue on mainstreaming GBV in government programmed 2.2 Hold stakeholder engagements to influence the integration of VAWG/HP response in NDP Programme Implementation Action Plans 2.1 . i) 4 MDAs and 6 DLGs have developed strategies for response to VAWG, HP and SRHR in plans and budgets 2.1 ii) 12 MDAs and 6 District Local Governments trained and mentored to mainstream VAWG, HP and SRHR in plans and budgets 2.1.5 Develop curricular for 4 pre and in service training institutions to integrate VAW/VAC/HP and integrated SRHR training 2.2.1 Support Ministry of Gender Coordination of GBV interventions 2.2.3 Over 100 Government Officials trained in gender responsive budgeting to end WAG/HP and SRHR 3.2.7 i) Support 20 women groups (100 women) with livelihood and economic empowerment programs to promote reduction in violence against women and girls. 3.2.7 ii) Support formation and formalisation of 60 women led mining groups T 3.3.2 14 companies identified and trained on gender seal certification Mechanism for recognition of excellence of private sector, CSOs, Local Governments for integrating GBV T 4.1.4 Train legal aid service providers on (i) VAW/VAC/HP and SRHR, (ii) early identification of incidents ,on mandate in prevention and response, (iv) referring mechanisms, and (v) use of alternative dispute resolution guidelines. Conduct mentoring for police, prosecutors, magistrates, and probation and social welfare officers, as well as legal representation and psychosocial support to survivors using the IJM Collaborative Case Management model 4.2.1 Support at least 200 GBV survivors have increase knowledge and access to quality essential Services 1.2.1 2 Multi media advocacy campaigns for the passing of the legal aid bill conducted by LASPNET. 2.1 One (1) High level meeting and one national stakeholders’ meem convened to review the coordination mechanisms 2.2 3 NDP3 Programme Implementation Action Plans have mainstreamed VAWG/Response ie the Human Capital Programme; 2.1.1. 4 MDAs (Ministry of Gender, Ministry of Public Service, Ministry of Local government have developed strategies for GBV response. These include revision of inspection manual to mainstream GBV response; review of accountability mechanism performance management systems/tools in public service; initiate coordination of VAWG 127 staff on 12 MDAs and 6 DLG staff have been trained and mentored on integration of GBV in plans and budgets. 2.1.5 Draft curricular for 4 preservice training institutions in place. Pretest of the curricular and TOT training has been conducted. UNDP supported a Joint initiative to build capacity of JLOS institutions in GBV response (UNDP/UNWomen and UNICEF) 2.2.1 Ministry of Gender was supported to convene the GBV response Committee was supported to convene national meetings and implementation plan developed 2.2.3 160 government officials in 6 District Local Governments and 12 MDAs have been trained and mentorship is ongoing on mainstreaming GBV response in plans and budgets. 3.2.7 Over 383 F and 13m supported trained and supported and provided agro inputs to start livelihood initiatives 2 in 22 groups including rice, groundnuts, mushrooms cassava farming and vegetable growing and poultry, piggery and goat rearing and also value addition. These were 16 groups of 232(224F:8M) iin Tororo, and 6 groups 164(159F:5M) in Kampala. 39 women mining groups were trained on formalization processes and equipped with entrepreneurial knowledge and skills, business development and financial management skills to operate successful business and prevent/respond to VAWG and SGBV/HP 14 companies were identified and enrolled in the Gender Equity Seal Certification programme. The Guideline and checklist drafted for recognition of excellence of institutions that mainstream GBV in their programmes 4.1.4 44 officials were trained and identified as TOTs in investigation, prosecution, adjudication, and trauma-informed care in response to cases of GBV and VAC. These included officials from the Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development (MGLSD), Uganda Police Force (UPF), the Office of the Directorate of Public Prosecutions (ODPP), and the Judiciary. 4.2.1 No result yet attained 2.1 one functioning national and/or sub-national coordination and oversight mechanisms at the highest level in place for addressing VAWG/VAC/HP and promoting SRHR, that includes representation from marginalized groups 2.2Increase budget being allocated to the prevention and elimination of all forms of VAWG/HP, by sector 2.1.1 4 MDAs and 6 DLGs have strategies, plans and/or programmes to prevent and respond to VAWG, including SGBV/HP and promote women and girls’ SRHR, including for vulnerable women and girls. 2.1.5 4 targeted national and sub-national training institutions for public servants that have integrated gender equality and VAWG, including SGBV/HP and the promotion of women and girls’ SRHR in their curriculum, as per international standards (pre and in-service) 2.2.1 One national multi-stakeholder coordination mechanism established and/or strengthened composed of relevant stakeholders, with a clear mandate and governance structure and with annual work plans 2.3.3 Key government officials in 6 Spotlight Districts and 11 MDAs with greater knowledge, capacities and tools on gender-responsive budgeting to end VAWG, including SGBV/HP, and to promote women and girls’ SRHR 2.1 One national GBV high level coordination platform in place at Ministry of Gender; one national GBV/Covid coordination platform established. Ministry of Gender coordinated and conducted 2 high-level dialogues with Government officials and Parliament on increasing response and financing GBV in plans and budgets. 2 policy briefs developed on GBV financing and GBV and on GBV/Covid response. . The National GBV/VAC Multi-Sectoral COVID-19 Response Plan (2021-2024) developed 2.2 : %age allocation is not yet assessed. However 3 NDP3 Government PIAPS have specific and costed interventions on GBV included. i.e community development, Community mobilization; Human Capital Development. 6 Districts have 49 costed interventions for GBV prevention and response financed in district Budget Framework Papers and Development Plans 2.1 .1 4 MDAs and 6 DLGs have strategies for response to VAWG, HP and SRHR .6 DLGs have costed strategies in DDPs . (MoPS with curricular & reviewed accountability and performance mechanism: MoLG with revised inspection manual; Ministry of Gender with National Covid response strategy; checklist and guideline; PSFU with TOT curricular and Gender Quality Seal programme 2.1.5 4 pre and in service training institutions with revised curricular that has been adopted to integrate VAW/VAC/HP and SRHR training. The institutions are in the process of customizing these courses. These are Civil Service College of Uganda, Nsamizi Institute of social Development, Law Development Centre and Uganda Management Institute. An online course on GBV mainstreaming in plans and budgets has been developed and civil Service College and a multi media centre established to support online capacity building for government officials. 2.2.1 One partner coordination mechanism established by Ministry of Gender and coordination meetings held. A GBV dashboard developed to facilitate monitoring and coordination of GBV response interventions by partners at national and Local Government Level. 2.2.3 179 government officials in 6 District Local Governments and 127 MDA with capacity mainstreaming GBV response in plans and budgets. A pool of 10 GVB government experts established and facilitated to conduct GBV trainings for government officials and selected officials from 5 cities UNSCDF Outcome 3.2: By 2025, Gender equality and human rights of people in Uganda are promoted, protected, and fulfilled in a culturally responsive environment. Outcome 1: Legislative and policy frameworks, based on evidence and in line with Ugandas commitments at regional and international levels on the human rights of women and girls and other vulnerable groups, on all forms of VAWG/HP are in place and translated into plans Output 1.1: Strengthened evidence-based knowledge and capacities to draft, assess gaps and draft new and/or strengthened existing legislation. Output Indicator 1.1.1: Number of draft new and/or strengthened laws and/or policies on ending VAWG and/or gender equality and non-discrimination developed that respond to the rights of women and girls facing intersecting and multiple forms of discrimination and are in line with international HR standards, within the last year. Target: Two (2) Output Indicator 1.1.5: Number of Parliamentarians, Uganda Law Reform Commission, and staff of human rights institutions with strengthened capacities to advocate for, draft new and strengthen existing legislation and/or policies on VAWG including SGBV/HP and/or gender equality and non-discrimination, including the promotion of women and girls SRHR, and implement the same. Target: 37(F:14) Uganda output indicator 1.1.1b: Number of subnational governments in target districts supported to develop or strengthen ordinances addressing VAWG/HP and SRHR, with accompanying financing and oversight mechanism. Target: Zero (0) Outcome 2: National and sub-national systems and institutions plan, fund and deliver evidence-based programmes that prevent and respond to violence against women and girls and harmful practices, including in other sectors. Outcome Indicator 2.1: Existence of a functioning regional, national and/or sub-national coordination and oversight mechanisms at the highest levels for addressing VAWG/HP that include representation from marginalized groups. Target: Yes (n=2) Outcome Indicator 2.2: Percentage of national budget being allocated to the prevention and elimination of all forms of VAWG/HP. Target: 1.0% (Yes) Uganda Outcome Indicator 2.2b: Percentage of targeted sub-national budgets allocated to the prevention and elimination of all forms of VAWG, including SGBV/HP, by district and MDAs. Target: 2.1% Output 2.1: Key officials at national and/or sub-national levels in all relevant institutions are better able to develop and deliver evidence-based programmes that prevent and respond to VAWG, especially for those groups of women and girls facing intersecting and multiple forms of discrimination, including in other sectors. Output Indicator 2.1.1: Number of institutions that develop strategies, plans and/or programmes to prevent and respond to VAWG, including for those groups of women and girls facing intersecting and multiple forms of discrimination. Target: Six (6) Output Indicator 2.1.5: Number of targeted national and sub-national training institutions for public servants that have integrated gender equality and ending VAWG, including SGBV/HP and the promotion of women and girls’ SRHR, in their curriculum as per international standards. Target: Two (2) Output 2.2: Multi-stakeholder national and/or sub-national coordination mechanisms established at the highest level and/or strengthened that are adequately funded and include multi-sectoral representation and representation from the most marginalized groups. Output Indicator 2.2.1: Multi-stakeholder VAWG coordination mechanisms are established at the highest level and/or strengthened, and are composed of relevant stakeholders, with a clear mandate and governance structure and with annual work plans, within the last year. Target: Yes (n=2) Uganda Output indicator 2.2.1b: Number of supported sub-national multi-stakeholder coordination mechanisms established and/or strengthened composed of relevant stakeholders, with clear mandate and governance structure and with annual work plans. Target: One (1) Output 2.3: Partners (Parliamentarians, key government officials and women’s rights advocates) at national and/or sub-national levels have greater knowledge, capacities and tools on gender-responsive budgeting to end VAWG Indicator 2.3.3: Number of key government officials with greater knowledge, capacities and tools on gender-responsive budgeting to end VAWG, including SGBV/HP, and to promote women and girls’ SRHR. Target: 25(F:9) Outcome 3: Gender inequitable social norms, attitudes and behaviours change at community and individual levels to prevent violence against women and girls and harmful practices. Output 3.2: Community advocacy platforms are established/strengthened to develop strategies and programmes, including community dialogues, public information and advocacy campaigns, to promote gender-equitable norms, attitudes and behaviours, including in relation to women and girls’ sexuality and reproduction, self-confidence and self-esteem and transforming harmful masculinities. Uganda Output Indicator 3.2.7: Number of women and girls benefiting from skilling and livelihood opportunities, by type. Target: 1,525 Output 3.3: Decision makers in relevant non-state institutions and key informal decision makers are better able to advocate for implementation of legislation and policies on ending VAWG and for gender-equitable norms, attitudes and behaviours and women and girls’ rights. Output Indicator 3.3.2: Number of relevant non-state institutions that have been supported to develop and/or strengthen strategies/policies on ending VAWG and promoting gender-equitable norms, attitudes and behaviours and women and girls’ rights, including those groups facing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination, in line with international HR standards, within the last year. Target: Seventeen (17) Outcome 4: Women and girls who experience violence and harmful practices use available, accessible, acceptable, and quality essential services including for long term recovery from violence. Output 4.1 Relevant government authorities and women’s rights organizations at national and sub-national levels have better knowledge and capacity to deliver quality and coordinated essential services, including SRH services and access to justice, to women and girls’ survivors of violence, especially those facing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. Output Indicator 4.1.3: Existence of national guidelines or protocols that have been developed and/or strengthened in line with the guidance and tools for essential services. Target: Yes Uganda output Indicator 4.1.4: Number of target sectors and MDAs that have developed and/or strengthened national guidelines, protocols, SOPs, or tools, in line with relevant guidance, for delivery of integrated essential services. Target: Two (2) Output Indicator 4.1.5: Number of government service providers in target districts who have increased knowledge and capacities to deliver quality and coordinated essential services to women and girls’ victims/survivors of VAWG including SGBV/HP (by sector: Health, Mental Health, Social Welfare, Police, DPP, Education, Judiciary, DLG). Target: 1,237 (F:504) Results attained under outcome 1 LASPNET (CSO) conducted advocacy for the passing of the National Legal Aid bill. Consensus building stakeholder engagements were held that composed of Members of Parliament, Legal Aid Service Providers These provided input into the draft National Legal Aid Bill. The Legal Aid Bill was presented to the 11th Parliament by a private mover for its 1st reading and referred to the Legal and Parliamentary Committee for further consultations. -Supported the National GBV/VAC COVID-19 response subcommittee to hold engagements with MDAs. Outcome 2: National and sub-national systems and institutions plan, fund and deliver evidence-based programmes that prevent and respond to violence against women and girls and harmful practices, including in other sectors. Results attained under Output indicator 2.1 - Result under Output indicator 2.1.1: Four (4) Ministries have developed and implemented programmes for prevention and response to VAWG. This include Ministry of Gender (Advocacy for GBV financing, capacity building), Ministry of Internal Affairs (border engagements on trafficking in persons), Ministry of Public Service (training and mentorship of government officials) and Ministry of Local Government (enhancing capacity of Local Council Courts on case management and response). - 7 District Local governments supported to develop Local Government GBV Action plans reflecting all related interventions in the districts for ease of coordination. Output indicator 2.1.5 - Through the leadership of Ministry of Public Service, 2 pre and in-service training institutions included GBV modules in their programmes Nsamizi Training Institute for Social Development integrated GBV in 1 certificate course and 4 diploma courses. Uganda Management Institute integrated GVB in all Masters Programmes and 4 postgraduate diploma courses. This was complimented by TOTs conducted for 76 Males and 48 academic staff were in 3 pre-service and in-service training institutions. The experts will be supporting the trainings in the different institutions. Output 2.1 Key officials at national and/or sub-national levels in all relevant institutions are better able to develop and deliver evidence-based programmes that prevent and respond to VAWG, especially for those groups of women and girls facing intersecting and multiple forms of discrimination, including in other sectors. Results attained under output 2.1: - Using the GBV e-course developed in phase one at Civil Service College of Uganda, 143 public 0ficials enrolled for the 1st Online training in GBV responsive planning and budgeting. So far, 71 Males and 19 males have graduated. Through the physical learning at the civil service college, 133 government officials (86 M: 47F) from MDAs and LGs attended face-to-face training on planning and budgeting for GBV mainstreaming. The trained officials have committed to forming GBV working groups, are continuing advocacy for increased gender financing and are supporting periodic monitoring of GBV indicators. - As part of the Performance Management Circular, the Ministry of Public Service mentored 204 Males and 122 Females to increase performance management & internal accountability mechanisms for GBV response in these Local Governments. Support supervision was conducted in 34 Local Governments and 1 Regional Referral Hospital. PSFU in collaboration with the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (MEMD) conducted on-hands training of 945 (M=415, F=530) artisanal miners on value addition in 3 districts of Kasese, Kitgum and Tororo. These gained appropriate skills to produce high quality products which are sold to enhance their incomes. 120 GBV survivor miners and out of school girls in Tororo and Kasese were given enterprise based skills in baking and tailoring, 140 women and out of school girls were given revolving grants to provide business start-up and boost ongoing business as livelihood enhancement tools. The beneficiaries were also sensitized on GBV prevention and response - Five (5) non-state institutions supported to develop strategies on ending VAWG. These included Private Sector Foundation Uganda on Gender Equality Seal, KAWOU on increasing male engagement and supporting artisanal miners in Amudat, COSMESS and HADS- supporting livelihood interventions for GBV survivors, Action Aid Uganda to support construction and operationalization of the GBV Shelters for GBV survivors in Amudat and Terego. MDA- Ministry of Local government developed a handbook for LCC that was used to build capacity on case management and response. - Ministry of Local Government built the capacity of 18 Local Council Courts (90 LCC Members (19 females and 71 males) in 18 Sub counties of Kitgum and Kyegegwa districts.The LCC practices enhanced include LCC procedures, alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, use of referral pathways for GBV issues and Adjudication of matters relating to i) the Domestic Violence Act, ii) the Children’s Act, and iii)Customary Land Matters. There is also improved LCC case recording and disposal, for instance, in Kitgum, out of the 438 cases registered, 40 cases were handled by the LCC while 289 took the matter to the court. Contribution under Output 4.1: UNDP Support towards HIV/AIDS - UNDP supported capacity strengthening of capacity of Uganda AIDS Commission (UAC) in coordination, human rights and HIV programming. UAC was facilitated to convene human rights and HIV meetings amongst partners. The follow-on actions from the engagements informed some of the discussions at the 2022 National HIV symposium which was held on 8th – 10th November 2022. - UNDP supported UAC to assess the performance of government MDAs implementing large infrastructure projects in form of budget allocation (How much money they allocated to HIV mainstreaming in their work plans and budgets and budget performance. UNDP further supported re-orientation of MDAs in HIV mainstreaming (Ministry of Works and Transport, UNRA, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development. -UNDP contributed to system strengthening of civil society associations through human rights programming. -UNDP supported the strengthening of system of CSO association through creating a sustainable HIV financing environment. A study was undertaken on reflecting on funding gains and securing sustainability of programming in Key Population Organizations in Uganda. UNDP participated in the the study by KP organizations in partnership with Uganda AIDS commission. -UNDP strengthened capacity of the member companies of Private Sector Foundation. The One Dollar Initiative is a Private Sector- Led innovative domestic resource mobilization mechanism to eradicate HIV/AIDS and its associated health challenges in Uganda by 2030 – The initiative was supported to mobilize more companies into the initiative and to coordinate the existing ones. Enhanced the visibility to the One (1) Dollar Initiative at the National HIV symposium. -UNDP has routinely convened meetings that bring together UN Agencies on HIV and Human Rights to provide technical guidance to the nationals response. -UNDP contributed to the review of the National Equity Plan where UNDP is a member of the National Steering Committee. - UNDP provided technical guidance to the preparations for organizing the National HIV Symposium, World AIDS Day, Philly Luyaaya Day which are major advocacy days for in the HIV response, where Uganda as a country reviews gains made in the response and sets an agenda for the subsequent year. Number of subnational governments in target districts supported to develop or strengthen ordinances for addressing VAWG/HP and SRHR, with accompanying financing and oversight mechanism This Indicator measures the number of policies on ending VAWG drafted/ strengthened. Strengthened means revision of policies or guidelines to expand their scope or align with international standards. Note: The value for this indicator is only is counted if the revised or newly developed law is passed by parliament or policy is approved by government with evidence of date of approval or when passed. Number of targeted national and sub-national training institutions for public servants that have integrated gender equality and ending VAWG, including SGBV/HP and the promotion of women and girls’ SRHR, in their curriculum as per international standards. Baseline: Zero (0) (2018 This indicator measures the number of Highest-level mechanisms housed at either President, Vice-President, or Prime Minister Office with connected coordination mechanisms formed at sub-national level after the single national mechanism is established. Relevant stakeholders mean that the mechanism include staff from different sectors and representation from marginalized groups (e.g. PWDs, Eldery,non-nationals including refugees, Youths, Children, IDPs, miniority groups etc) Clear mandate implies the mechanism has clear mission and unifying statements." This indicator measures the number of parliamentarians whose knowledge and capacities have been strengthened to hold relevant stakeholders accountable to fund and implement multi-sectoral programmes to address VAWG, including SGBV/HP, and to promote women and girls’ SRHR This indicator measures the number of Non state institutions that include the media, workplaces, sports, business etc. that have been supported to develop and/or strengthen strategies/policies on ending VAWG and promoting gender-equitable norms, attitudes and behavior's and women and girls’ rights. LNOB include involvement of PWDs, youths, young women, minority groups, non - nationals including refugees etc indicator measures the quality essential services offered to GBV survivors in terms of social work, legal aid services, mental health, among others XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00118485 United Nations Development Programme DPC - Stand Alone project to support the 2021-2025 management costs for the country office in Uganda UGA Office of the Prime Mster GREEN CLIMATE FUND UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME COMESA NOR - MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 312502 1282218 1144110 8 10 170540 502957 384 United Nations Development Programme 155639 United Nations Development Programme 93614 United Nations Development Programme -79670 United Nations Development Programme 125663 United Nations Development Programme 82386 United Nations Development Programme -229749 United Nations Development Programme 93593 United Nations Development Programme -174414 United Nations Development Programme 7546 United Nations Development Programme 24411 United Nations Development Programme -59551 United Nations Development Programme 74747 United Nations Development Programme 272926 United Nations Development Programme 248062 United Nations Development Programme -125376 United Nations Development Programme 129075 United Nations Development Programme 56321 United Nations Development Programme -21480 United Nations Development Programme 380705 United Nations Development Programme 241595 United Nations Development Programme 407 United Nations Development Programme 28522 United Nations Development Programme -398116 United Nations Development Programme -1499 United Nations Development Programme 564008 United Nations Development Programme -131686 United Nations Development Programme -290106 United Nations Development Programme -110 United Nations Development Programme 489681 United Nations Development Programme 12590 United Nations Development Programme 44097 United Nations Development Programme -32428 United Nations Development Programme 2178 United Nations Development Programme 299 United Nations Development Programme 10902 United Nations Development Programme 3733 United Nations Development Programme 3733 United Nations Development Programme -700099 United Nations Development Programme -239837 United Nations Development Programme -131736 United Nations Development Programme -108996 United Nations Development Programme 562541 UGA Office of the Prime Mster Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme. (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing =$1,349,000 (2016) ,Project/Programme Documents/Project reports/AWPs (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE)=$0 (2016), Project/ Programme Documents/Project reports/AWPs Number of staff benefiting from DPC=45 (2016), Project/ Programme Documents/Project reports/AWPs Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place=A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place.(2014), 2) Number of staff with skills and knowledge in target areas=106 (2016), training report. 3) Annual NIM audit report in place=Annual NIM audit report (2015), Annual NIM audit report. 4) Number of HACT micro-assessment reports=26 (2016), HACT website. 5) A functional aid management platform=partial (2016), Sector reports. 6) UNDP Annual Report in place=UNDP annual report (2016), UNDP website. 7) Up-to-date website in place=UNDP website (2016), UNDP website. 8) Updated corporate brochure in place=Updated corporate brochure (2016), UNDP website. 9) Op-eds in place=Op-eds in place (2016), UNDP website. 10) Video blogs in place=video blogs(2016), UNDP website. 11) 5 of planned evaluations conducted = 3 evaluations Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: No. of MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities = 1 (2016), 3.2). 2 diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme. (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing =$1,349,000 (2016) ,Project/Programme Documents/Project reports/AWPs (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE)=$0 (2016), Project/ Programme Documents/Project reports/AWPs Number of staff benefiting from DPC=45 (2016), Project/ Programme Documents/Project reports/AWPs Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place=A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place.(2014), 2) Number of staff with skills and knowledge in target areas=106 (2016), training report. 3) Annual NIM audit report in place=Annual NIM audit report (2015), Annual NIM audit report. 4) Number of HACT micro-assessment reports=26 (2016), HACT website. 5) A functional aid management platform=partial (2016), Sector reports. 6) UNDP Annual Report in place=UNDP annual report (2016), UNDP website. 7) Up-to-date website in place=UNDP website (2016), UNDP website. 8) Updated corporate brochure in place=Updated corporate brochure (2016), UNDP website. 9) Op-eds in place=Op-eds in place (2016), UNDP website. 10) Video blogs in place=video blogs(2016), UNDP website. 11) 5 of planned evaluations conducted = 3 evaluations Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: No. of MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities = 1 (2016), 3.2). 2 diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme. (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing. (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE). Number of staff benefiting from DPC. Output2: Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place. 2) Number of staff with skills and knowledge in target areas. 3) Annual NIM audit report in place. 4) Number of HACT micro-assessment reports. 5) A functional aid management platform. 6) UNDP Annual Report in place. 7) Up-to-date website in place. 8) Updated corporate brochure in place. 9) Op-eds in place. 10) Video blogs in place. 11). Number of planned evaluations conducted = 3 evaluations Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: No. of MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 3.2. Number of diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing = $1,100,900 (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) = $555,382 Number of staff benefiting from DPC.=50 Output2: Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place = 2 Reports on CPD portfolio performance for 2019 and that of 2020 2) 60 staff with skills and knowledge in target areas, UNDP staff and partner capacities enhanced 3) Annual NIM audit report in place = 1 annual NIM audit completed 4) 6 HACT micro-assessment reports completed= 6 HACT micro-assessment reports 5) A functional aid management platform in place = Fully 6) UNDP Annual Report in place = 1 UNDP Annual Report 7) Up-to-date website in place = Annual up-to-date website 8) Updated corporate brochure in place = 1 corporate brochure updated 9) Op-eds in place = 2 Op-eds published 10) Video blogs in place = 2 video blogs 11. 3 planned evaluations completed Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: 8 MDAs and 70 LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities 3.2 Three diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing = $1,100,900 (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) = $555,382 Number of staff benefiting from DPC.=50 Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place 2) 72 staff with skills and knowledge in target areas, UNDP staff and partner capacities enhanced 3) Annual NIM audit report in place = 1 annual NIM audit completed 4) 12 HACT micro-assessment reports completed= 12HACT micro-assessment reports 5) A functional aid management platform in place = Fully 6) UNDP Annual Report in place = 1 UNDP Annual Report 7) Up-to-date website in place = Annual up-to-date website 8) Updated corporate brochure in place = 1 corporate brochure updated 9) Op-eds in place = 3 Op-eds published 10) Video blogs in place = 3 video blogs 11. 3 planned evaluations completed Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: 8 MDAs and 70 LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities 3.2 Nine diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme. (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing. (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE). Number of staff benefiting from DPC. Output2: Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place. 2) Number of staff with skills and knowledge in target areas. 3) Annual NIM audit report in place. 4) Number of HACT micro-assessment reports. 5) A functional aid management platform. 6) UNDP Annual Report in place. 7) Up-to-date website in place. 8) Updated corporate brochure in place. 9) Op-eds in place. 10) Video blogs in place. 11). Number of planned evaluations conducted = 3 evaluations Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: No. of MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 3.2. Number of diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing = $1,100,900 (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) = $555,382 Number of staff benefiting from DPC.=50 Output2: Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place = 2 Reports on CPD portfolio performance for 2019 and that of 2020 2) 60 staff with skills and knowledge in target areas, UNDP staff and partner capacities enhanced 3) Annual NIM audit report in place = 1 annual NIM audit completed 4) 6 HACT micro-assessment reports completed= 6 HACT micro-assessment reports 5) A functional aid management platform in place = Fully 6) UNDP Annual Report in place = 1 UNDP Annual Report 7) Up-to-date website in place = Annual up-to-date website 8) Updated corporate brochure in place = 1 corporate brochure updated 9) Op-eds in place = 2 Op-eds published 10) Video blogs in place = 2 video blogs 11. 3 planned evaluations completed Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: 8 MDAs and 70 LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities 3.2 Three diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing = $1,100,900 (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) = $555,382 Number of staff benefiting from DPC.=50 Output2:Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) A CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place 2) 72 staff with skills and knowledge in target areas, UNDP staff and partner capacities enhanced 3) Annual NIM audit report in place = 1 annual NIM audit completed 4) 12 HACT micro-assessment reports completed= 12HACT micro-assessment reports 5) A functional aid management platform in place = Fully 6) UNDP Annual Report in place = 1 UNDP Annual Report 7) Up-to-date website in place = Annual up-to-date website 8) Updated corporate brochure in place = 1 corporate brochure updated 9) Op-eds in place = 3 Op-eds published 10) Video blogs in place = 3 video blogs 11. 3 planned evaluations completed Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: 8 MDAs and 70 LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities 3.2 Nine diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme. (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing. (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE). Number of staff benefiting from DPC. Output2: Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) CPD annual portfolio review report/minutes in place. 2) Number of staff with skills and knowledge in target areas. 3) Annual NIM audit report in place. 4) Number of HACT micro-assessment reports. 5) A functional aid management platform. 6) UNDP Annual Report in place. 7) Up-to-date website in place. 8) Updated corporate brochure in place. 9) Op-eds in place. 10) Video blogs in place. 11). Number of planned evaluations conducted = 3 evaluations Output 3: Enhanced SDG Implementation through Policy Innovation and effective Planning 3.1: No. of MDAs and LGs developing and implementing strategic development plans and frameworks and complying with NDPII Priorities. 3.2. Number of diagnostic studies published and disseminated Output1: Enhanced programme cost recovery and/or direct project costing to the implementation of the UNDP Country Programme (a) 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing = $1,000,000 (b) 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) = $500,000 Number of staff benefiting from DPC.=45 Output2: Improved Effectiveness of development Cooperation, & CPD Implementation 1) 60 staff with skills and knowledge in target areas, UNDP staff and partner capacities enhanced 2) Annual NIM audit report in place = 1 annual NIM audit completed 3) 10 HACT micro-assessment reports completed= 10 HACT micro-assessment reports 4) A functional aid management platform in place = Fully 5) UNDP Annual Report in place = 1 UNDP Annual Report 6) Up-to-date website in place = Annual up-to-date website 7) Updated corporate brochure in place = 1 corporate brochure updated 8) Op-eds in place = 2 Op-eds published 9) Video blogs in place = 5 video blogs 10) 3 planned evaluations completed 64398 – Direct Project Costs in USD– Staffing 74598 – Direct Project Costs in USD – General Operating Expenses (GOE) XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00123560 United Nations Development Programme COVID 19: Strengthening Emergency Response in Uganda to support Government efforts in fighting the pandemic UGA Office of the Prime Mster BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 2000 20765 85000 268608 10000 -188 United Nations Development Programme -12 United Nations Development Programme 636 United Nations Development Programme -79 United Nations Development Programme 199 United Nations Development Programme 5 United Nations Development Programme -327 United Nations Development Programme 1736 United Nations Development Programme 5601 United Nations Development Programme 237928 United Nations Development Programme 89913 United Nations Development Programme 353608 BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION United Nations Development Programme 336977 UGA Office of the Prime Mster Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Project did not have a results framework but worked to attain the results below 1.Expand national capacity for COVID- 19 testing and increased border surveillance and cross-border coordination. a. Support the conducting of periodic rapid risk assessment and local level surveillance in hotspots for Covid-19 detection and reporting (coupled with the provision of a few bicycles/ motorcycles, on a pilot basis for increased mobility of community-based health workers in a few hotspots) b. Provide a grant to Uganda Virus Research Institute to strengthen timely testing and collaboration between sub-national and national arms of the NECOC. 2. Strengthen national coordination capacities for emergency response and recovery with a robust Knowledge Management System for the National Emergency Coordination and Operations Centre. a. Recruit and deploy a multidisciplinary team of four specialists (2 Disaster Risk and Resilience, 1 Knowledge Management, and 1 Emergency Communications Specialist) to form a core team to activate a think tank in NECOC. (one of the Disaster Risk and Resilience specialists will preferably have a bias in cross-border disaster risk coordination) b. conduct strategic risk assessments c. Prepare and disseminate analytical reports, policy briefs and best practices to inform policy, planning, budgeting and stakeholder engagement on COVID-19 and other disasters d. Design a multi-sector strategy to inform short, medium and long-term capacity development for disaster risk reduction and mitigation. e. Provide small grant funding to support research by members attached to the think-tank. N/A Project did not have an established baseline N/A N/A 1.Expand national capacity for COVID- 19 testing and increased border surveillance and cross-border coordination. a. Support the conducting of periodic rapid risk assessment and local level surveillance in hotspots for COVID-19 detection and reporting (coupled with the provision of a few bicycles/ motorcycles, on a pilot basis for increased mobility of community-based health workers in a few hotspots) b. Provide a grant to Uganda Virus Research Institute to strengthen timely testing and collaboration between sub-national and national arms of the NECOC. 2. Strengthen national coordination capacities for emergency response and recovery with a robust Knowledge Management System for the National Emergency Coordination and Operations Centre. a. Recruit and deploy a multidisciplinary team of four specialists (2 Disaster Risk and Resilience, 1 Knowledge Management, and 1 Emergency Communications Specialist) to form a core team to activate a think tank in NECOC. (one of the Disaster Risk and Resilience specialists will preferably have a bias in cross-border disaster risk coordination) b. conduct strategic risk assessments c. Prepare and disseminate analytical reports, policy briefs and best practices to inform policy, planning, budgeting and stakeholder engagement on COVID-19 and other disasters d. Design a multi-sector strategy to inform short, medium and long-term capacity development for disaster risk reduction and mitigation. e. Provide small grant funding to support research by members attached to the think-tank. 1.Expanded the national capacity for COVID- 19 testing and increased border surveillance and cross-border coordination. a. Supported the conducting of periodic rapid risk assessment and local level surveillance in hotspots for COVID-19 detection and reporting (coupled with the provision of a few bicycles/ motorcycles, on a pilot basis for increased mobility of community-based health workers in a few hotspots) b. Provided a grant to Uganda Virus Research Institute to strengthen timely testing and collaboration between sub-national and national arms of the NECOC. 2. Strengthened national coordination capacities for emergency response and recovery with a robust Knowledge Management System for the National Emergency Coordination and Operations Centre. a. Recruited and deploy a multidisciplinary team of four specialists (2 Disaster Risk and Resilience, 1 Knowledge Management, and 1 Emergency Communications Specialist) to form a core team to activate a think tank in NECOC. (one of the Disaster Risk and Resilience specialists will preferably have a bias in cross-border disaster risk coordination) b. conducted strategic risk assessments c. Prepared and disseminated analytical reports, policy briefs and best practices to inform policy, planning, budgeting and stakeholder engagement on COVID-19 and other disasters d. Designed a multi-sector strategy to inform short, medium and long-term capacity development for disaster risk reduction and mitigation. e. Provided small grant funding to support research by members attached to the think-tank. 1. National capacity for COVID- 19 testing and border surveillance and cross-border coordination Increased. a. Periodic rapid risk assessment and local level surveillance in hotspots for COVID-19 detection and reporting and provision of a few bicycles/ motorcycles for increased mobility of community-based health workers in few selected hotspots Supported b. Grant to Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI) to strengthen timely testing and collaboration between sub-national and national arms of the National Emergency Coordination Operation Centre (NECOC) provided. 2. National coordination capacities for emergency response and recovery with a robust Knowledge Management System for the National Emergency Coordination and Operations Centre strengthened. a. A multidisciplinary team of four specialists recruited and deployed. c. Analytical reports, policy briefs and best practices to inform policy, planning, budgeting and stakeholder engagement on COVID-19 and other disasters prepared and disseminated. d. A multi-sector strategy to inform short, medium and long-term capacity development for disaster risk reduction and mitigation designed. e. A small grant funding to support research by members attached to the think-tank provided. Results attained under indicator Number one (1) : • Built capacity of 32 Health workers (86% target) in 19-selected Health Facilities (HFs) in Central, Western, Eastern, Northern & West Nile sub-regions in community level sentinel surveillance. • Four new Border surveillance sentinel sites introduced and health workers trained and provided surveillance tools. • All sites were provided with supplies like Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Antigen kits (100 kits @site), Personal Protective Equipment (PPEs) and logistics for community outreach. • Increased surveillance sentinel site reports shared bi-weekly with (National Emergency Coordination Operation Centre) NECOC for EW use. • Enhanced border surveillance made it possible for UVRI to detect (AH1NI) 2009 at the new border site of Bibia HCIII. • Six (6) Motorcycles procured to support 6 selected Health Centers in community and local level surveillance. • Community outreaches carried out and sensitized on surveillance of influenza, COVID-19, health education, etc. a) Conducting of periodic rapid risk assessment and local level surveillance in hotspots for Covid-19 detection and reporting: - Finalized the 1st ever Rapid Needs Assessment Framework comprising of a set of tools namely; Pre-Disaster Assessment Tool, Rapid Needs Assessment Triger Sheet, Disaster Impact Rapid Needs Assessment Tool. - Wide consultation and input conducted for the Tools with select DDMCs, OPM-DRDPM Staff, National Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) Platform & a National multi-sector / Inter-agency workshop. -The tools were adopted by Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) and partners and currently under use in disaster assessments in Uganda. - A Health facility specific assessment tool on surveillance, and readiness for preparedness & response to outbreaks, developed and deployed to assess 5 H/Facilities & DHOs. - Rapid Assessment carried out in selected health facilities in Kampala & Mukono, border points in Malaba, Elegu & Mpondwe, and DDMCs of Tororo, Amuru & Kasese. The report highlighted major challenges to DRM and gives key policy recommendations to enhance preparedness and response to natural disasters like floods and other PHEs like COVID-19 and Ebola. b) USD 25,200 Grant was provided and transferred to UVRI to enable the achievement of results in (1) 2) The following results were attained towards strengthening national coordination capacities for emergency response and recovery - A draft Knowledge Management Strategy for the National Emergency Coordination and Operations Centre is in place. - A multidisciplinary team of four specialists (2 Disaster Risk and Resilience, 1 Knowledge Management, and 1 Emergency Communications Specialist) forming a core team to activate a think tank in NECOC was established and in place. - Policy brief on Rapid Assessment Report Summary Findings - highlighting key findings, best practices, and policy recommendations for Health & DRM sectors and Institutional recommendations for MoH, UVRI, Health Facilities, OPM/NECOC, DLGs, UNDP and other Partners. - Policy Brief - Strengthening Uganda’s emergency response and recovery capacity for COVID-19 was finalized and disseminated through training of health workers in sentinel surveillance sites. - Finalised and disseminated the SERRU Briefing Note for OPM Management. - Finalized and disseminated guidance Notes and Reporting formats for the three Rapid Assessment tools. - Finalized proposal/concept note drafted to scale-up SERRU Project gains e.g. to support the operationalization & digitization of the RNA tools, and support development of an integrated emergency / disaster management system for OPM. (d) A multi-sector strategy to inform capacity development for disaster risk reduction and mitigation was developed, finalized and widely disseminated. (e) A USD 40,000 grant was extended to Makerere University towards supporting the research Agenda and members of the think-tank. As a result, six (6) research reports and policy briefs were finalized. These covered areas of: 1. Socio-economic determinants of health in Uganda 2. Health seeking behaviour and experiences with health service delivery during peak and non-peak periods of the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda. 3. COVID-19 vaccination in Uganda: Community perceptions, vaccination management, coverage demographics and experiences with the service provision. 4. Data and Information management: Systems and tools for effective disaster risk communication. 5. Transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in space and time over Uganda: Hotspots and Brightspots controls 6. Disaster risk governance under COVID-19 at multiple scales in Uganda. Existence of a functional national coordination capacities for emergency response and recovery with a robust Knowledge Management System for the National Emergency Coordination and Operations Centre. Partial existence Fully exists Exists fully XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00126095 United Nations Development Programme Harnessing Nature And Digital Technology To Stimulate The Recovery And Build A Resilient Tourism Industry In Uganda UGA Office of the Prime Mster UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Austrian Development Agency Undefined registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 139800 214217 500872 291926 1191067 2788 United Nations Development Programme 2134 United Nations Development Programme 57604 United Nations Development Programme 12530 United Nations Development Programme 27239 United Nations Development Programme 17542 United Nations Development Programme 7943 United Nations Development Programme 1605 United Nations Development Programme 1597 United Nations Development Programme 1599 United Nations Development Programme 2201 United Nations Development Programme 1562 United Nations Development Programme 21200 United Nations Development Programme 3034 United Nations Development Programme 3629 United Nations Development Programme 89156 United Nations Development Programme 2885 United Nations Development Programme 2920 United Nations Development Programme 134497 United Nations Development Programme -24 United Nations Development Programme 8437 United Nations Development Programme 11018 United Nations Development Programme 88225 United Nations Development Programme 103462 United Nations Development Programme 39645 United Nations Development Programme 35754 United Nations Development Programme 10082 United Nations Development Programme 20694 United Nations Development Programme 1237 United Nations Development Programme 1873 United Nations Development Programme 4280 United Nations Development Programme 215 United Nations Development Programme 131 United Nations Development Programme 66 United Nations Development Programme 364958 United Nations Development Programme 1010754 United Nations Development Programme 2100657 UGA Office of the Prime Mster Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Output 1: Green jobs created for women and youth to rebuild resilient livelihoods during and after COVID. Indicator 1.1: No. of participatory and integrated green development assessments (diagnostics) and investment plans Indicator 1.2: No. of active traditional and innovative financial instruments supporting new market opportunities for women and youth in food, agriculture, and commodities systems (FACS). Indicator 1.3: No. of targeted women and youth informal MSMEs supported and actively participating in green and localized value chains. Output 2: Stimulus packages for the green recovery targeting MSMEs. Indicator 2.1: No of targeted Women and Youth MSMEs and informal sector players in tourism business ecosystem supported with green stimulus packages. Indicator 2.2: No. of investment ready ideas identified and supported to access investment financing under the Uganda Development Bank, Uganda Development Corporation, and other streams of public and private development/investment finance. Indicator 2.3: No. of innovative financing instruments for green investments designed with the financial services sector Indicator 2.4: No. of active commercial ideas for rural livelihoods that are protecting biodiversity. Indicator 2.5 Number of targeted tourism products developed that meet the needs of targeted market segments (Culinary, Soft adventure, Cultural tourism, Handicraft and souvenirs, Cycling tracks, races) Output 3: Strategic policy reorientation towards inclusive green recovery, risk-informed development and enhanced national system capacities. Indicator 3.1: No of targeted leaders (Sex disaggregated) sensitized and trained on green recovery Indicator 3.2: Domestic Tourism Strategy prepared for Cabinet approval Indicator 3.3: Digitized classification and grading system for the hospitality enterprises. Indicator 3.4 Videography and photography content developed for promotion of tourism Indicator 3.5: No. of e-conferences supported for tourism stake Output 1: Green jobs created for women and youth to rebuild resilient livelihoods during and after COVID. Indicator 1.1: No. of participatory and integrated green development assessments (diagnostics) and investment plans Baseline: One (1) Indicator 1.2: No. of active traditional and innovative financial instruments supporting new market opportunities for women and youth in food, agriculture, and commodities systems (FACS). Baseline: Zero (0) Indicator 1.3: No. of targeted women and youth informal MSMEs supported and actively participating in green and localized value chains Baseline: Zero (0) Output 2: Stimulus packages for the green recovery targeting MSMEs. Indicator 2.1: No of targeted Women and Youth MSMEs and informal sector players in tourism business ecosystem supported with green stimulus packages. Target: Zero (0) Indicator 2.2: No. of investment ready ideas identified and supported to access investment financing under the Uganda Development Bank, Uganda Development Corporation, and other streams of public and private development/investment finance. Baseline: Zero (0) Indicator 2.3: No. of innovative financing instruments for green investments designed with the financial services sector Baseline: One (1) Indicator 2.4: No. of active commercial ideas for rural livelihoods that are protecting biodiversity. Baseline: One (1) Indicator 2.5 Number of targeted tourism products developed that meet the needs of targeted market segments (Culinary, Soft adventure, Cultural tourism, Handicraft and souvenirs, Cycling tracks, races) Baseline (0) Output 3: Strategic policy reorientation towards inclusive green recovery, risk-informed development and enhanced national system capacities. Indicator 3.1: No of targeted leaders (Sex disaggregated) sensitized and trained on green recovery Baseline: Zero (0) Indicator 3.2: Domestic Tourism Strategy prepared for Cabinet approval Baseline: Zero (0) Indicator 3.3: Digitized classification and grading system for the N/A Project started in 2021 N/A - Project started in 2021 Output 1: Green jobs created for women and youth to rebuild resilient livelihoods during and after COVID-19. Indicator 1.1: No. of participatory and integrated green development assessments (diagnostics) and investment plans. Target: Eighteen (18) Indicator 1.2: No. of active traditional and innovative financial instruments supporting new market opportunities for women and youth in food, agriculture, and commodities systems (FACS). Target: Nine (9) Indicator 1.3: No. of targeted women and youth informal MSMEs supported and actively participating in green and localized value chains Target: Two Hundred Thirty Nine ( 239) Output 2: Stimulus packages for the green recovery targeting MSMEs. Indicator 2.1: No of targeted Women and Youth MSMEs and informal sector players in tourism business ecosystem supported with green stimulus packages Target: Two Hundred Thirty Nine (239) Indicator 2.2: No. of investment ready ideas identified and supported to access investment financing under the Uganda Development Bank, Uganda Development Corporation, and other streams of public and private development/investment finance. Target: Thirteen (13) Indicator 2.3: No. of innovative financing instruments for green investments designed with the financial services sector Target : Eighteen (18) Indicator 2.4: No. of active commercial ideas for rural livelihoods that are protecting biodiversity. Target : Thirteen (13) Indicator 2.5: Number of targeted tourism products developed that meet the needs of targeted market segments (Culinary, Soft adventure, Cultural tourism, Handicraft and souvenirs, Cycling tracks, races) Target: Fourteen (14) Output 3: Strategic policy reorientation towards inclusive green recovery, risk-informed development and enhanced national system capacities. Indicator 3.1: No of targeted leaders (Sex disaggregated) sensitized and trained on green recovery Baseline: Two Hundred Five (205) Indicator 3.2: Domestic Tourism Strategy prepared for Cabinet approval. Target: Two (2) Indicator 3.3: Digitized classification and grading system for the hospitality enterprises Target: One (1) Indicator 3.4: Videography and photography content developed for promotion of tourism Target: One (1) Indicator 3.5: No. of e-conferences supported for tourism stakeholder engagements on tourism infrastructure, tourism and rural development, and sustainable tourism. Target: Twenty Four (24) Indicator 3.6: Electronic Document Management System for Uganda Tourism Board established Target: Three (3) Output 4: Active innovation ecosystem for recovery of the tourism sector with accelerated digital transformation, clean and efficient energy solutions. Indicator 4.1: No. of tourism ecosystem services and agricultural value chains supported with innovative digital payment and e-commerce platforms. Target: Fifteen (15) Indicator 4.2: No. of tourism linked social service and businesses supported with solar (renewable energy) to support digital revolution. Target: One Hundred Thirty Three (133) Output 5: Project Monitoring and Evaluation Indicator 5.1: No. of M&E reports in place (disaggregated by, monitoring reports, evaluation reports (midterm, and end term) Target: Ten (10) - 100 cultural and birding guides trained (50 trained in cultural and 50 trained in birding) -UNDP has partnered with the Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife & Antiquities and the Toro Kingdom to develop a new tourism product named the ‘’Ekyooto Ha Mpango tourism and cultural festival’’ that has focused on facilitating investments within the domestic tourism market, it’s supply chain for economic growth and sustainable job opportunities through investment workshops. Ekyooto Ha mpago cultural tourism festival supported business clinics for youth and growing entrepreneurs, a total of 150 attendees for 3 physical sessions, 1835 online attendance. -UWEC supported to construct the childrens educational Center -UNDP facilitated the 500 trainees with aprons, spatulas, head hats, kitchen towels and 40 movable food carts fitted with 3kg gas cylinders to aid in boosting their businesses. - procurement of 06 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and VHF Radio communication to aid in suppressing poaching of wildlife and offer protection of cultural heritages Output 1: Green jobs created for women and youth to rebuild resilient livelihoods during and after COVID-19. Indicator 1.3: No. of targeted women and youth informal MSMEs supported and actively participating in green and localized value chains. Target: Two Hundred Ninety Three (293) Output 2: Stimulus packages for the green recovery targeting MSMEs. Indicator 2.5: Number of targeted tourism products developed that meet the needs of targeted market segments (Culinary, Soft adventure, Cultural tourism, Handicraft and souvenirs, Cycling tracks, races) Target: Eighteen (18) Output 3: Strategic policy reorientation towards inclusive green recovery, risk-informed development and enhanced national system capacities. Indicator 3.3: Digitized classification and grading system for the hospitality enterprises Target: Two (2) Indicator 3.5: No. of e-conferences supported for tourism stakeholder engagements on tourism infrastructure, tourism and rural development, and sustainable tourism. Target: Twenty One (21) Output 1: Green jobs created for women and youth to rebuild resilient livelihoods during and after COVID-19. Results attained under output 1 (one): The livelihood capacity of over 200 youth and women (majority of whom are ex-poachers) around targeted conservation areas in areas of Kibale, Rwenzori, Bwindi, and Lake Mburo was strengthened. UNDP in partnership with Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) equipped them with the skills and tools to pursue alternative livelihoods such as apiary farming (Apiculture). Output 2: Stimulus packages for the green recovery targeting MSMEs. Results attained under output two (2) With UNDPs support, a new sports tourism product - Rwenzori Marathon - was developed. The product pioneered in Kasese was a collective effort by UNDP, Uganda Wildlife Authority and the private sector to diversify Uganda’s tourism product range by harnessing the country’s rich topography; broaden meaningful community participation in the tourism value chain and drive domestic and international tourist traffic to experience the enchanted adventure that the Rwenzori offers. In addition, UNDP supported the development of the Rwenzori Mountain Royal expedition documentary to promote mountaineering tourism in the Rwenzoris whilst amplifying the conversation about the need to tackle biodiversity loss and the impact of climate change on the Rwenzori Mountain ranges. Output 3: Strategic policy reorientation towards inclusive green recovery, risk-informed development and enhanced national system capacities. Results attained under output three (3) UNDP fostered a platform to rethink and explore the imperatives to stimulate recovery and drive the resilience agenda of the tourism industry in these unprecedented times of planetary crisis, conflict and disease. The platform also brought to the fore the consequences of climate change for Uganda; and the need for climate action including imperatives green recovery stimulus packages targeting SMEs. UNDP also supported the Government to prepare the Regulatory Impact Assessment of the Tourism Bill 2022 to inform decisions by Cabinet of Uganda on the proposed amendment to the Tourism Act 2008. 1.1: # of policies and regulations developed to support productivity, enhance competitiveness, and facilitate market access for MSMEs 2.1: # of inclusive green business models initiated or scaled up for improved livelihoods 2.3: # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00092244 United Nations Development Programme Climate Change Resilience and Disaster Risk Reduction for National Transformation. UGA Office of the Prime Mster UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UN DEPT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS UNDP Funding Windows UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00097049 United Nations Development Programme The programme will support GoU to strengthen; policy response on integration, provision of incentives & deterrents measures; national policy implementation capacities; LGs to build a strong community resilient to climate change and other disasters UGA Office of the Prime Mster UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UN DEPT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 All types of emergencies that are determined by GLIDE number. These are mostly, if not all, outside of any coordinated appeals or joint response plans 76 113965 210804 911636 631394 1174400 1006800 400870 -69 United Nations Development Programme -12 United Nations Development Programme 125441 United Nations Development Programme 342838 United Nations Development Programme 758900 United Nations Development Programme 454365 United Nations Development Programme 1092379 United Nations Development Programme 912424 United Nations Development Programme 283297 United Nations Development Programme 3969563 UGA Office of the Prime Mster Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Output 1 1.1: Number of target institutions that have developed, policies, strategies, and budgets that integrate sustainable energy, natural resource and land management, biodiversity, climate change and DRR mitigation and resilience initiatives. 1.2: Percentage of sectors and institutions integrating climate change mitigation, disaster-risk recovery and resilience into development plans and budgets. 1.3: Number of districts where local climate change adaptation fund is established and operational to provide financial resources for climate change adaptation interventions. Output 2: 2.1: Existence of harmonized functional national climate information and early warning system. 2.2: Extent to which a system exists to access, deliver, monitor, report and verify the use of environmental and climate finance. 2.3: Number of national/sub-national development and key sectoral plans that explicitly address disaster and/or climate risk management being implemented, dis aggregated by those which are gender responsive. Output 3: 3.1: Number of functional platforms established to engage populations at all levels for sustainable environment and natural resources, CC-R and energy access 3.2: Number of gender responsive pilot and demonstration projects/business models adopted or scaled up by national partners Output 4: 4.1 Percentage of target population with access to early warning (including climate information), dis aggregated by gender (% of women and of the targeted population have access to early warning (including climate information), dis aggregated by gender). Output 1: By end 2018, targeted MDAs have adequate technical, functional and financial capacity to integrate and operationalize NRM and climate change mitigation policies and strategies, including: (a) execution of priority gender-responsive investments that increase energy access and consumption efficiency and promote low-carbon and renewable modern energy services; and (b) scale-up of climate change mitigation / adaptation and disaster-risk management strategies 1.1: 63 institutions developed, policies, strategies, and budgets that integrate sustainable energy, natural resource and land management, biodiversity, climate change and DRR mitigation and resilience initiatives (2013 - Sector review reports) 1.2: 20% of sectors and institutions integrating climate change mitigation, disaster-risk recovery and resilience into development plans and budgets (2013 - National climate change finance analysis report; hazard, risk, & vulnerability profile reports) 1.3: Zero districts where local climate change adaptation fund is established and operational to provide financial resources for climate change adaptation interventions (2015 - MoLG data) Output 2: By 2018, MDAs with adequate technical, operational and financial capacities to implement CCR/DRR policies and regulatory frameworks 2.1: There is no harmonized functional national climate information and early warning system (2014 - NECOC) 2.2: There is no existence of a system to access, deliver, monitor, report and verify the use of environmental and climate finance (2013 - Overseas Development Institute reports) 2.3: 10 national/sub-national development and key sectoral plans that explicitly address disaster and/or climate risk management being implemented, disaggregated by those which are gender responsive (2013 - NECOC) Output 3: By 2018, MDAs with adequate technical, technological, operational and financial capacities to engage the private sector, LGs and CSOs to deliver on gender responsive CCR/DRR innovations 3.1: Result 1.1 Enhanced policy, legal and regulatory framework for climate change response and disaster risk reduction 1.1.1 Print copies of the National Climate Change Law Result 1.3. Climate change response and Disaster Risk Reduction integrated and mainstreamed in policies, plans and budgets of MDAs and local governments. 1.3.1 Finalize and launch the National Vulnerability and Risk Atlas of Uganda. Result 2.2 A strengthened and integrated functional climate information, early warning and response system established. 2.2.1. U-NEWS monthly Bulletin Developed and Disseminated 2.2.2 Undertake data rescue and digitization of the historical data (1930-1960). 4.1. Mass Public awareness created on CCR, early warning and disaster risk reduction and technologies 4.1.1 Produce and disseminate Publicity and visibility (documentary, press coverage) Output 7. 1: Enhanced Coordination Capacity for response and recovery from floods and Landslides 7.1.1 Enhance response coordination mechanisms at national, district and community level 7.1.2 Develop multi sectoral tools for data analysis and visualization. Output 7. 2: Multi sector assessments to determine early recovery needs response measures 7.2.1 Conduct joint assessments to determine specific community recovery needs to enhance resilience of the affected population Output 7. 3:Resilience and early recovery framework developed 7.3.2 Develop an early recovery and Resilience Framework Output 8.Improved coordination of multi-hazard induced disasters preparedness, response, and recovery 8.1 Enhance Multi-sectoral Coordination Capacity of National (NECOC) and Local Governments(DECOC) for integrated multi-hazard Response 8.2 Strengthen Assessment Capacity for NECOC 8.3 Enhance Disaster Risk Communication (National to Local and vis-versa) 8.4 Improve Border Surveillance and Tracking 1.3.1 Finalization of the National Vulnerability and Risk Atlas was done 2.2.1 UNIEWS was produced and distributed every month 2.2.2 Data rescue and digitization of historical data (1930-1960) was not done. 4.1.1 Two documentaries and several visibility materials were done about early warning and press coverage of the International Day for Disaster Reduction (IDRR). 7.1.1 A National Disaster Response Framework was developed and toll free lines established to enhance response coordination mechanisms at national, district and community level 7.1.2 Multi-sectoral tools were developed for mapping, collection, analysis of data and visualization of information concerning disasters and multi-hazard early warning 7.2.1 A joint assessment was done to determine the impact of floods and multiple disasters and the recovery needs were identified for each of the projects affected 7.3.2 A National Business continuity plan in the event of disasters was developed as part of the Resilience Framework 8.1 Capacity of NECOC was enhanced through equipping NECOD with data capturing equipment like drones and computers for data management, training users at NECOC and in DECOCs 8.2 Assessment capacity of NECOC was strengthened through equipment instalments at District level and training users on GIS, use of the drones and providing all time solar powered stations for data management 8.3 Disaster Risk Communication was enhanced through engagement of media houses, televisions and radios, to share information about how NECOD works but also share disaster risk information regularly 8.4 Development of tracking tools for borderline surveillance was not done because of time and resources. Output 1 1.1: Number of target institutions that have developed, policies, strategies, and budgets that integrate sustainable energy, natural resource and land management, biodiversity, climate change and DRR mitigation and resilience initiatives. 1.2: Percentage of sectors and institutions integrating climate change mitigation, disaster-risk recovery and resilience into development plans and budgets. 1.3: Number of districts where local climate change adaptation fund is established and operational to provide financial resources for climate change adaptation interventions. Output 2: 2.1: Existence of harmonized functional national climate information and early warning system. 2.2: Extent to which a system exists to access, deliver, monitor, report and verify the use of environmental and climate finance. 2.3: Number of national/sub-national development and key sectoral plans that explicitly address disaster and/or climate risk management being implemented, dis aggregated by those which are gender responsive. 1.1.2 The National Climate change Bill was approved by Parliament 1.1.3 Climate change and Disaster Risk Reduction were integrated into NDPIII 1.2.3 GoU signed the international charter space and to ensure sustainability of access to UNOSAT Data 1.2.4 The National Disaster Response and Recovery Plan was developed 1.3.5 National Planning Authority carried out Climate Change compliance assessments for sector development plans. Local government sectoral / technical heads of departments of newly created districts (Kagadi, Kakumiro, Rukiga, Rubanda, Bunyangabu, Pakwach, Omoro, Namisindwa and Butebo) were trained on the integration of climate change in district development planning and budgeting. 2.2.1 The U-NIEWS monthly bulletin that notifies MDAs, INGO’s, NGO’s, Farmers, UN Agencies and public on probable disasters which may occur without warning based on climate and weather forecast was produced and disseminated. 2.2.3 capacity of MDAs on NDA procedures and financing opportunities especially GCF accreditation and proposal development was built by Ministry of Finance and NPA. Project Technically Closed Project Technically closed Mechanisms established to engage populations at all levels for sustainable environment and natural resources, and energy access. Projects/business models that mainstream gender adopted or scaled up by national partners XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00102861 United Nations Development Programme Low Emission Capacity Building Project (LECB) Phase II in line with the 2021-2025 CPD aligned with NDP III UGA Office of the Prime Mster UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNDP Funding Windows registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Bududa District second-order administrative division 1.050000 34.400000 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 0 3235 82369 394316 646635 516484 50000 -16125 United Nations Development Programme 99903 United Nations Development Programme 443480 United Nations Development Programme 241932 United Nations Development Programme 292092 United Nations Development Programme 35516 United Nations Development Programme 1112923 UGA Office of the Prime Mster Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). 1. Number of Districts trained on gender and climate change programming 2. Number of MRV systems enhanced for NDC implementation 3. Number of women and youth led organization accessing NDC low value grant scheme for climate change actions. 4. Establishment of a climate for development facility 5. Number of private sector players trained on an online digital reporting tool to enhance reporting on the contributions of the private sector towards NDC and SDG actions. 6. Number of photo stories developed and disseminated 7. Revised NDC for Uganda, emission factors for the waste sector developed and standardized baseline on improved 1. No Districts trained on gender and climate change programming Baseline:Zero (0) 2. No MRV systems enhanced for NDC implementation Baseline: Zero (0) 3. No women and youth led organization accessing NDC low value grant scheme for climate change actions. Baseline: Zero (0) 4. No climate for development facility established Baseline: Zero (0) 5. No private sector players trained on an online digital reporting tool to enhance reporting on the contributions of the private sector towards NDC and SDG actions. Baseline: Zero (0) 6. Few photo stories developed and disseminated Zero (0) 7. No revised NDC for Uganda, emission factors for the waste sector developed and standardized baseline on improved Baseline: Uganda’s first updated NDC in place, No emission factors for the waste sector, No standardized baseline in place on improved cook stoves 1. 40 districts- (120 district staff) Districts trained on gender and climate change programming 2. 01 MRV systems enhanced for NDC implementation 3. 12 women and youth led organization accessing NDC low value grant scheme for climate change actions. 4. Establishment of a climate for development facility 5. 80 private sector players trained on an online digital reporting tool to enhance reporting on the contributions of the private sector towards NDC and SDG actions. 6. 01 photo stories developed and disseminated 7. Revised NDC for Uganda, emission factors for the waste sector developed and standardized baseline on improved 1. 10 districts (29 staff- 20 male and 9 female) trained on gender and climate change programming Districts trained on gender and climate change programming 2. 00 MRV systems enhanced for NDC implementation 3. 06 women and youth led organization accessing NDC low value grant scheme for climate change actions. 4. No climate facility establishment of a climate for development facility 5. 60 private sector players trained on an online digital reporting tool to enhance reporting on the contributions of the private sector towards NDC and SDG actions. 6. 01 photo stories developed and disseminated 06 grantees. 7. No revised NDC for Uganda, emission factors for the waste sector developed and standardized baseline on improved 1. Number of Districts trained on gender and climate change programming Target: 40 districts- (120 district staff) Districts trained on gender and climate change programming 2. Number of MRV systems enhanced for NDC implementation Target: 01 MRV systems enhanced for NDC implementation 3. Number of women and youth led organisation accessing NDC low value grant scheme for climate change actions. Target: 12 women and youth led organization accessing NDC low value grant scheme for climate change actions. 4. Establishment of a climate for development facility Target: Establishment of a climate for development facility 5. Number of private sector players trained on an online digital reporting tool to enhance reporting on the contributions of the private sector towards NDC and SDG actions. Target: 80 private sector players trained on an online digital reporting tool to enhance reporting on the contributions of the private sector towards NDC and SDG actions. 6. Number of photo stories developed and disseminated Target: 01 photo stories developed and disseminated 7. Revised NDC for Uganda, emission factors for the waste sector developed and standardised baseline on improved Target:Revised NDC for Uganda, emission factors for the waste sector developed and standardised baseline on improved Output 1: Integrated governance to deliver on NDC outcomes Indicator 1: Number of improved institutionalised, governance, structures and processes for NDC implementation. Target 1.1: One (1) organised to approve the updated Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) by the National Climate Change Advisory Committee and Parliamentarians. Target 1.2: One (1) National post COP26 workshop organised to discuss the outcomes of COP26 and their implications in Uganda’s context. Target 1.3: Web hosting fees for Uganda’s MRV tool. Output 2: Capacities developed to design climate friendly investments, address investor risk, blend and catalyse climate finance. Indicator 2: Number of capacity development workshops held to design climate friendly investments. Target 2.1:One workshop held to finalize development of NDC implementation plan, resource mobilization plan and 5 concept notes for priority sectors. Target 2.2: One capacity building workshop organised for the national task force on climate change mechanisms Target 2.3: Engagement of a Designated Operating Entity (DOE) to support validation of Ugandas SB on improved institutional cookstoves. Target 2.4: One (1) validation workshop organised for the Standardised baseline (SB) on improved institutional cook stoves. Output 5: Sharing of best practices and knowledge management Indicator 5: Number and type of knowledge products generated and disseminated (including gender targets). Target 5.1: One (1) One side event organized during the Africa climate week Output 1: Integrated governance to deliver on NDC outcomes Indicator 1: Number of improved institutionalised, governance, structures and processes for NDC implementation Results against targets attained under output 1 and indicator 1. Result for target 1.1: Final updated NDC for Uganda was approved by cabinet and submitted to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in September 2022. In addition, the NDC implementation and resource mobilization plan has been developed to ensure effective implementation of the NDC. Results for target 1.2: A National Post COP26 workshop was organised with key stakeholders including government Ministries, Departments and Agencies, CSOs, private sector and youth. The workshop discussed implications of the COP26 outcomes in the Ugandan context, how the outcomes will be implemented at national level, opportunities that COP26 presents for Uganda and discussed strategies that the country will undertake to implement the key outcomes and the roadmap to COP27 Result for target 1.3: Hosting for Uganda’s integrated MRV tool has been completed and the web hosting. Capacity development on the integrated MRV tool is expected to be conducted in December 2022. Output 2: Capacities developed to design climate friendly investments, address investor risk, blend and catalyze climate finance. Indicator 2: Number of capacity development workshops held to design climate friendly investments Results against targets attained under output 2 and indicator 2 Results for for target 2.1: One workshop was held to discuss the draft NDC implementation plan. The stakeholder workshop was attended by 120 participants (70 M;50 F). The Draft NDC implementation and resource mobilization plan has been completed. A stakeholder consultation workshop was held to discuss the draft implementation plan. In addition, five project concept notes, describing 5 specific NDC measures have been prepared for resource mobilization. The concept notes will be a starting point for resource mobilization for NDC implementation across different sectors. The five concept notes are developed under the following areas; - Sustainable multi-modal transport system in Uganda’s urban areas, including Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area (GKMA) through electric bus rapid transit, electric Standard Gauge Railway light rapid mass transit and non-motorized transport modes in the transport sector. - Restoring the health of agricultural Rangeland and Mountain Landscapes through Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA) in Uganda’s Environment and Natural Resources Management; and Agriculture sectors. - De-risking the expansion of post-harvest handling facilities and Warehouse Receipt System of Area-based Agricultural Commodities in the Agriculture Sector in Uganda. - Strengthening governance for gender-responsive Climate Change planning and management in District Local Governments across all sectors. - Strengthening climate resilience of health care systems in climate change disaster risk prone areas in the Health and Disaster Risk Reduction. Result for target 2.2: A capacity building workshop was organised for the national task force on carbon markets. Through the capacity building workshop, the understanding of the task force members was enhanced on the concepts of climate financing in the context of the Paris Agreement and the provisions and implications for Article 6 on cooperative and non-market approaches for climate financing, and the related provisions of the National Climate Change Act in the context of NDC implementation. Result for target 2.3: A Designated Operating Entity called Carbon Check was involved to support the assessment of the draft Standardised baseline on improved cook stoves. 2 assessments have been conducted on the draft Standardised baseline. The final comments have been provided and the consultant is finalising the report based on the comments from the DOE. The SB provides enhance calculation of emission reductions in the cook stove sector. Result for target 2.4: A Stakeholder engagement meeting organised with the Ministry of Water and Environment and the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development which discussed the draft Sstandardized baseline (SB) Output 5: Sharing of best practices and knowledge management. Indicator 5: Number and type of knowledge products generated and disseminated (including gender targets Result against targets attained under output 3 indicator 3 Results for target 5.1: Africa Regional Monitoring Reporting and Verification (MRV) experience sharing dialogue was organised during the Africa Climate Week (ACW) The event was organised in collaboration with the UNFCCC Regional collaboration centre and the NDC Partnership. The Africa MRV side event was organised on 29th August 2022 as part of the Africa climate week. The event was attended by 80 participants from different countries. The event created a platform to share experiences among countries on MRV and the alignment of the MRV to article 6 reporting requirements under the Paris agreement. XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00092245 United Nations Development Programme RLCD programme will support GoU through legal reforms and practices to realize an independent credible Electoral Commission; effective accessible justice system; and full respect of human rights of Ugandans including women, youth and marginalized groups United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF UGANDA UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF NETHERLANDS registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00097050 United Nations Development Programme By end 2020, rule of law, separation of powers and constitutional democracy are entrenched in Uganda and all individuals are treated equally under the law and have equitable access to justice. United Nations Development Programme GOVERNMENT OF NETHERLANDS UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF UGANDA registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Gulu District second-order administrative division 2.856040 32.430010 Soroti fourth-order administrative division 1.701960 33.638230 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 0 1785 95601 250907 153577 780643 995196 655482 315000 -44 United Nations Development Programme -1464 United Nations Development Programme 48 United Nations Development Programme 237532 United Nations Development Programme 256347 United Nations Development Programme 125318 United Nations Development Programme 693429 United Nations Development Programme 836036 United Nations Development Programme 585112 United Nations Development Programme 219320 United Nations Development Programme -145196 UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME United Nations Development Programme 145196 GOVERNMENT OF UGANDA United Nations Development Programme 145196 GOVERNMENT OF UGANDA United Nations Development Programme 2953142 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Output 1: 1.1.1.1: Percentage of Bills completed 1.1.1.2: % of enacted laws that are implemented 1.1.1.3: % Proportion of completed to registered cases 1.1.1.4 No. of bills that are human rights compliant enacted 1.1.1.5: Extent to which Electoral Commission effectively meet minimum core function performance benchmarks (Electoral laws implemented Credible register Level Playing field Transparency Voter education Free and credible elections Independence of EC) 1.1.1.6: Leadership forum in place and functional (Parliament, Elders forum) Output 2: 1.1.2.1: No. of targeted democracy institutions with functional e-governance systems to promote efficiency and accountability a) No of courts connected to the Court Case Administration System (CCAS) b) Human Rights Information System (HURIS) c) Electoral Complaints Management System (ECMS) 1.1.2.2: No of districts in Northern and Eastern Uganda with a complete chain of frontline JLOS services (Police Station, Prosecution/legal aid, adjudication and Prison) 1.1.2.3: Extent to which HRC and Electoral Commission effectively meet minimum core function performance benchmarks 1.1.2.4: Proportion of HR cases disposed of Output 3: 1.1.3.1: An inclusive and functional Civil Society’s engagement platform in place (MoU amongst CSOs ,Number of meetings, Reports) 1.1.3.2: Number of Journalists reporting on Human Rights promotion and good governance 1.1.3.3: Number of persons equipped with knowledge and advocacy skills on accountability for gender laws and policies disaggregated by sex, MPs and CSOs Output 4: 1.1.4.1: Number of LCI, II and III court officials trained 1.1.4.2: Proportion of cases disposed through alternative dispute resolutions 1.1.4.3: No. of targeted democracy institutions with functional e-governance systems to promote efficiency and accountability a) No of courts connected to the Court Case Administration System (CCAS) b) Human Rights Information System (HURIS) 1.1.4.4: Number of country diagnostics conducted tha Output 1: By 2017-18 Law Reform Commission, MoJCA), Judiciary, Parliament, JLOS and UHRC with Enhanced technical capacities to strengthen policies and legal frameworks for: (a) effective Separation of powers and assurance of smooth Electoral processes; and (b) HR promotion, respect and fulfillment, including equitable Access to justice. 1.1.1.1: 0% Percentage of Bills completed - (2015) Hansard 1.1.1.2: 38% of enacted laws that are implemented - (2014) JLOS performance report 1.1.1.3: 95% Proportion of completed to registered cases - (2015) JLOS performance report 1.1.1.4: Zero No. of bills that are human rights compliant enacted - (2015) Annual HR Reports 1.1.1.5: Electoral Commission Partially meets minimum core function performance benchmarks - (2013) - Election Observers’ Reports, HRC reports,Government Performance Report, Court Decisions 1.1.1.6: There is no Leadership Forum in plance and is fully functional - (2015)Parliamentary Commission Annual report, Hansard Output 2: By 2018, JLOS and UHRC with adequate technical capacities & tools for effective human rights promotion & protection and achievement of equitable and sustained access to justice; and the Electoral Commission with strengthened Capacities & tools to implement electoral laws and ensure free and credible elections. 1.1.2.1: (a): Zero number of courts connected to the Court Case Administration System (CCAS) - (2015) JLOS Report, (b): No Human Rights Information System(HURIS) at the UHRC - (2015) Human Rights Report (c): No Electoral Complaints Management System (ECMS) at EC - (2015)Parliamentary Commission Annual Report, 1.1.2.2: 38 (2016) Number of districts in Northern and Eastern Uganda with a complete chain of frontline JLOS services (Police Station, Prosecution/legal aid, adjudication and Prison) - JLOS Reports 1.1.2.3: HRC and Electoral Commission partially meet minimum core function performance benchmarks (2013) - HR Performance Reports 1.1.2.4: 14% Proportion of HR cases disposed Output Target 1: 1.1.1.1: 80% of Bills completed. 1.1.1.2: 70% of enacted laws that are implemented 1.1.1.3: 98% of completed cases to registered cases 1.1.1.6:Leadership forum in process Output Target 4 By 2020, MoJCA, MoIA, JLOS, UHRC, LGs and CSOs with Strengthened technical, technological and financial capacities to design, implement and evaluate models of HR promotion and improved Justice System Coverage & Management at decentralized level that are effective, efficient, sustainable and scalable, to inform national policies and development strategies Targets: 1.1.4.1: 5000 LCI, II and III court officials trained 1.1.4.3: 2 targeted democracy institutions with functional e-governance systems to promote efficiency and accountability 1.1.4.4: 1 country diagnostics conducted that have informed policy options on national response to sustainable and scalable models Output Target 1: 1.1.1.1:80% Percentage of Bills completed 1.1.1.2: 70% number of enacted laws that were implemented 1.1.1.3: 90% proportion of completed cases to registered cases 1.1.1.6:***Leadership forum on SDGs is in progress after the training of Parliament staff on SDGs Output Target 4 By 2020, MoJCA, MoIA, JLOS, UHRC, LGs and CSOs with Strengthened technical, technological and financial capacities to design, implement and evaluate models of HR promotion and improved Justice System Coverage & Management at decentralized level that are effective, efficient, sustainable and scalable, to inform national policies and development strategies Targets: 1.1.4.1: 5000 LCI, II and III court officials trained 1.1.4.3: 2 democracy institutions with functional e-governance systems to promote efficiency and accountability 1.1.4.4: 1 country diagnostics conducted that have informed policy options on national response to sustainable and scalable models Output Target 1: 1.1.1.1: 80% of Bills completed. 1.1.1.2: 70% of enacted laws that are implemented 1.1.1.3: 98% of completed cases to registered cases 1.1.1.6:Leadership forum in process Output Target 4 By 2020, MoJCA, MoIA, JLOS, UHRC, LGs and CSOs with Strengthened technical, technological and financial capacities to design, implement and evaluate models of HR promotion and improved Justice System Coverage & Management at decentralized level that are effective, efficient, sustainable and scalable, to inform national policies and development strategies Targets: 1.1.4.1: 5000 LCI, II and III court officials trained 1.1.4.3: 2 targeted democracy institutions with functional e-governance systems to promote efficiency and accountability 1.1.4.4: 1 country diagnostics conducted that have informed policy options on national response to sustainable and scalable models Output Target 1: 1.1.1.1:80% Percentage of Bills completed 1.1.1.2: 70% number of enacted laws that were implemented 1.1.1.3: 90% proportion of completed cases to registered cases 1.1.1.6:***Leadership forum on SDGs is in progress after the training of Parliament staff on SDGs Output Target 4 By 2020, MoJCA, MoIA, JLOS, UHRC, LGs and CSOs with Strengthened technical, technological and financial capacities to design, implement and evaluate models of HR promotion and improved Justice System Coverage & Management at decentralized level that are effective, efficient, sustainable and scalable, to inform national policies and development strategies Targets: 1.1.4.1: 5000 LCI, II and III court officials trained 1.1.4.3: 2 democracy institutions with functional e-governance systems to promote efficiency and accountability 1.1.4.4: 1 country diagnostics conducted that have informed policy options on national response to sustainable and scalable models Project Operationally closed Project Operationally closed XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00092356 United Nations Development Programme Strengthen institutions, enterprises and communities to improve their productive and income generation capacities by supporting the development of inclusive green value chains in tourism, mining, and agriculture sectors. UGA Min of Water and Env UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF EL SALVADOR MPTF-UN Uganda MPTF UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00122560 United Nations Development Programme Youth4Business Facility aims to spur impact-driven entrepreneurship and engage enterprises in tackling youth unemployment by leveraging innovations in selected economy sectors to create jobs and livelihood opportunities. UGA Min of Water and Env UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-UN Uganda MPTF GOVERNMENT OF EL SALVADOR registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 247437 405542 1759874 1258374 2054027 1050565 13438 United Nations Development Programme 22292 United Nations Development Programme 12548 United Nations Development Programme 11724 United Nations Development Programme 10550 United Nations Development Programme 11275 United Nations Development Programme 11550 United Nations Development Programme 20350 United Nations Development Programme 10962 United Nations Development Programme 26992 United Nations Development Programme 22766 United Nations Development Programme 26724 United Nations Development Programme -160 United Nations Development Programme 104906 United Nations Development Programme 40678 United Nations Development Programme 20898 United Nations Development Programme 18185 United Nations Development Programme 22116 United Nations Development Programme 42794 United Nations Development Programme 16415 United Nations Development Programme 95811 United Nations Development Programme 66003 United Nations Development Programme 47 United Nations Development Programme 5108 United Nations Development Programme 132474 United Nations Development Programme 47893 United Nations Development Programme 41932 United Nations Development Programme 31781 United Nations Development Programme 193802 United Nations Development Programme 128578 United Nations Development Programme 52404 United Nations Development Programme 100890 United Nations Development Programme 73328 United Nations Development Programme 408888 United Nations Development Programme -8661 United Nations Development Programme 36839 United Nations Development Programme 1253692 United Nations Development Programme 1372037 United Nations Development Programme 1019779 United Nations Development Programme 5565895 UGA Min of Water and Env Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Intended Outcome: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources Project Output 1: Institutional mechanisms to identify, nurture and support youth-led early-stage ideas to form start-ups strengthened (Spurring Innopreneurship) Indicator 2.1.3.2 # of MSMEs developed targeting vulnerable women and youth Project Output 2: System to support youth-owned and youth-led Enterprises pilot commercially viable innovative ideas and markets (Innovation Challenge Fund and Growth Accelerator) Indicator: 2.1.1.1: # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting undeserved communities/groups and women (SP 1.2.6) Indicator 2.1.4.1: # of new decent jobs (formal and informal) generated, disaggregated by sex, age, disability (SDG 8.9.2) Project Output 3: Mechanism to derisk and accelerate investment in scale-up of commercial viability innovative pilot products, services and business models. Indicator 2.1.2.1: # of new functional partnerships developed in the target value chains (SDG17.6.1) Indicator 2.1.3.3: # of targeted MSMEs that have accessed inclusive financing Project Output 4: Functional Entrepreneurship and Innovation Ecosystem Platform Indicator 4.1. Functional Youth4Business Ecosystem Platform in place Indicator 4.2. # of knowledge products produced Intended Outcome: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources Project Output 1: Institutional mechanisms to identify, nurture and support youth-led early-stage ideas to form start-ups strengthened (Spurring Innopreneurship) Indicator 2.1.3.2 # of MSMEs developed targeting vulnerable women and youth Baseline: Zero (0) Year: 2020 Project Output 2: System to support youth-owned and youth-led Enterprises pilot commercially viable innovative ideas and markets (Innovation Challenge Fund and Growth Accelerator) Indicator: 2.1.1.1: # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting undeserved communities/groups and women (SP 1.2.6) Baseline: One hundred (100) Year: 2019 Indicator 2.1.4.1: # of new decent jobs (formal and informal) generated, disaggregated by sex, age, disability (SDG 8.9.2) Baseline: Zero (0) Year: 2020 Project Output 3: Mechanism to derisk and accelerate investment in scale-up of commercial viability innovative pilot products, services and business models. Indicator 2.1.2.1: # of new functional partnerships developed in the target value chains (SDG17.6.1) Baseline: Zero (0) Year: 2020 Indicator 2.1.3.3: # of targeted MSMEs that have accessed inclusive financing Baseline: Seventy (70) Year: 2020 Project Output 4: Functional Entrepreneurship and Innovation Ecosystem Platform Indicator 4.1. Functional Youth4Business Ecosystem Platform in place Target: Zero (0) Year: 2020 Indicator 4.2. # of knowledge products produced Target: Zero (0) Year: 2020 N/A - 2020 was mainly a baseline year 1) 20 Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) supported to pilot and or scale-up innovative business models that create jobs and livelihood opportunities 1) 21 Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) supported to pilot and or scale-up innovative business models that create jobs and livelihood opportunities. Intended Outcome: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources Project Output 1: Institutional mechanisms to identify, nurture and support youth-led early-stage ideas to form start-ups strengthened (Spurring Innopreneurship) Target for indicator 2.1.3.2 : Ten (10) MSMEs developed targeting vulnerable women and youth. Project Output 2: System to support youth-owned and youth-led Enterprises pilot commercially viable innovative ideas and markets (Innovation Challenge Fund and Growth Accelerator) Target for indicator 2.1.1.1: Twenty five (25) locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up Target for indicator 2.1.4.1: 1,500 Females 1,000 Males new decent jobs. Project Output 3: Mechanism to derisk and accelerate investment in scale-up of commercial viability innovative pilot products, services and business models. Target for indicator 2.1.2.1 : One (1) new functional partnerships developed Target for indicator 2.1.3.3 : Twenty (20) targeted MSMEs that have accessed inclusive financing Project Output 4: Functional Entrepreneurship and Innovation Ecosystem Platform Target for indicator 4.1: Zero (0) functional Youth4Business Ecosystem Platform in place Target for indicator 4.2: One (1) knowledge products produced 1) 12 MSMEs developed targeting vulnerable women and youth 2 a) 47 innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women 2 b) 1,201 new decent jobs (formal and informal) generated, disaggregated by sex, age, disability 3 a) 3 new functional partnerships developed in the target value chains 3 b) 200 targeted MSMEs have accessed inclusive financing 4 a) 0 4 b) 0 Intended Outcome: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources Project Output 1: Institutional mechanisms to identify, nurture and support youth-led early-stage ideas to form start-ups strengthened (Spurring Innopreneurship) Target for indicator 2.1.3.2 : Forty five (45) MSMEs developed targeting vulnerable women and youth. Project Output 2: System to support youth-owned and youth-led Enterprises pilot commercially viable innovative ideas and markets (Innovation Challenge Fund and Growth Accelerator) Target for indicator 2.1.4.1: 4000 Females 2,500 Males new decent jobs. Project Output 3: Mechanism to derisk and accelerate investment in scale-up of commercial viability innovative pilot products, services and business models. Target for indicator 2.1.2.1 :Two (2) new functional partnerships developed Target for indicator 2.1.3.3 : Ninety (90) targeted MSMEs that have accessed inclusive financing Project Output 4: Functional Entrepreneurship and Innovation Ecosystem Platform Target for indicator 4.1: Partially functional Youth4Business Ecosystem Platform in place Output 1 1,349 youth-led start-up micro enterprises in targeted sectors where growth leads to jobs, equipped with entrepreneurial competencies, business management skills, technologies and catalytic risk capital to pilot and transform their innovations and early stage businesses ventures into viable enterprises that create jobs and livelihood opportunities for youth. By functioning as a risk-sharing mechanism, the Youth4Business Facility has stimulated the development of innovative inclusive business ideas that otherwise would not have taken place within the private sector. In addition, UNDP equipped two youth skilling and job placement centres in Kampala, with technologies and facilities to enable young people acquire skills for job placement and establishment of cottage industries. Output 2: The livelihoods of over 60,000 young people have been improved as a result of UNDPs partnership with 43 youth-owned and focused enterprises in agriculture and agribusiness, tourism, mining, manufacturing, renewable energy, construction, health and the creative arts industries to pilot commercially viable innovative ideas and scale their enterprises into thousands of jobs and livelihood opportunities for youth. Output 3 UNDP has established two new functional partnerships with Uganda Investment Authority and Office of the President (Presidential Advisory Committee on Exports and Industrial Development) to derisk and accelerate investment in scale-up of commercial viability innovative pilot products, services and business models, facilitate the creation of dedicated spaces within the business and industrial parks for youth and women; and increasing access to global niche markets in Africa, North America, Europe and Asia amongst women and youth led enterprises. 5 youth-led SMEs have accessed venture capital and development financing to scale their market-based solutions (innovative products, services, and business models) and diversify their product/ service offering; thus catalysing decent job creation. Output 4: Functional Entrepreneurship and Innovation Ecosystem Platform With the support of UNDP, a functional Youth4Business Ecosystem Platform - YouthConnekt Uganda - has been established. The platform launched by H.E. Gen. (Rtd) Yoweri K. Museveni, President of the Republic of Uganda, is intended to empower young people by connecting them to their role models, peers, resources, technologies, skills and economic opportunities to enhance knowledge, experiences and skills. The platform supported over 40 young people to exhibit their innovations at the YouthConnekt Africa Summit in Kigali, Rwanda # of MSMEs developed targeting vulnerable women and youth # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women (SP 1.2.6) # of new decent jobs (formal and informal) generated, disaggregated by sex, age, disability (SDG 8.9.2) # of new functional partnerships developed in the target value chains (SDG17.6.1) # of targeted MSMEs that have accessed inclusive financing Functional Youth4Business Ecosystem Platform in place 0 Fully developed youth for business Ecosystem Platform Partially developed Fully developed Fully developed Fully developed. Fully developed XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00096870 United Nations Development Programme Long term environmental sustainability and resilience of food production systems to achieve improved national food security enhanced. UGA Min of Agriculture UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF POLAND UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Global Environment Fund Truste registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00100758 United Nations Development Programme Long term environmental sustainability and resilience of food production systems in the 2021-2025 CPD as aligned to NDPIII UGA Min of Agriculture Global Environment Fund Truste UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF POLAND registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kotido District second-order administrative division 3.000000 34.100000 Moroto District second-order administrative division 2.638900 34.643950 Nakapiripirit District second-order administrative division 1.907180 34.596010 Kaabong District second-order administrative division 3.583330 34.000000 Nabilatuk fourth-order administrative division 2.092600 34.582910 Karenga fourth-order administrative division 3.565340 33.693480 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 5700 836692 1726474 1516922 1457516 445267 881634 119760 4914 United Nations Development Programme 19157 United Nations Development Programme 4511 United Nations Development Programme 16888 United Nations Development Programme 1835 United Nations Development Programme 345317 United Nations Development Programme 11065 United Nations Development Programme 15917 United Nations Development Programme 357146 United Nations Development Programme -404 United Nations Development Programme 16856 United Nations Development Programme 33386 United Nations Development Programme 34302 United Nations Development Programme 380780 United Nations Development Programme 58014 United Nations Development Programme 302242 United Nations Development Programme 28691 United Nations Development Programme 43571 United Nations Development Programme 8267 United Nations Development Programme 20699 United Nations Development Programme 13944 United Nations Development Programme 1226 United Nations Development Programme 15329 United Nations Development Programme 61935 United Nations Development Programme 10402 United Nations Development Programme 577549 United Nations Development Programme 493219 United Nations Development Programme 375057 United Nations Development Programme 330615 United Nations Development Programme 78885 United Nations Development Programme 3642942 UGA Min of Agriculture Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Goal: to improve food security by addressing the environmental drivers of food insecurity and their root causes in Karamoja sub-region. Indicator: Percentage of households suffering from hunger in Karamoja. Objective: to contribute to enhancing long-term environmental sustainability and resilience of food production systems in the Karamoja Sub-Region. Objective Indicator: Increase in intra and inter-seasonal livestock and crop productivity arising from SLM and INRM practices. OUTCOME 1: Supportive policies and incentives in place at district level to support improved crop and livestock production, food value-chains and INRM. Outcome Indicator: Number of supportive policies and incentives in place at district level to support viable SLM/INRM approaches. Output 1.1: Operational multistakeholder platforms are supporting INRM at district and regional levels Indicator: Number of multistakeholder platforms established supporting INRM per district, within which a percentage of women, men, youth, and indigenous people are represented. Output 1.2: Adequate legal instruments enabling INRM, land use planning and enforcement in place. Indicator: Number of legal instruments, policies, by-laws applied in Karamoja sub-region enabling INRM, land use planning and enforcement. OUTCOME 2: Increased land area under integrated natural resources management (INRM) and SLM practices for a more productive Karamoja landscape. Indicator: Number of hectares of cropland/rangeland/forest under integrated natural resources management and SLM per district. Output 2.1: Institutional technical capacities are strengthened to implement INRM/SLM. Indicator: Number of people trained on INRM, among which a percentage are women Output 2.2: Increase in the number of community members trained in INRM/SLM techniques Indicator: Number of community members trained in INRM and SLM practices, 60% of which are women. Output 2.3: Community groups are benefiting from income-generating activities ( Goal: to improve food security by addressing the environmental drivers of food insecurity and their root causes in Karamoja sub-region. Goal Indicator: Percentage of households suffering from hunger in Karamoja Baseline: 92% of households suffer from moderate or severe hunger in Karamoja (preliminary results from HH-BAT, January 2016). Objective: to contribute to enhancing long-term environmental sustainability and resilience of food production systems in the Karamoja Sub-Region. Objective Indicator: Increase in intra and inter-seasonal livestock and crop productivity arising from SLM and INRM practices. Objective Baseline: At present, the only available data is the average district level yield. During the baseline study, the project will strive to collect household level data. Maize 1.2 Sorghum: 0.65 Beans: 0.35 Cassava: 8.0 Sweet Potato:8.0. OUTCOME 1: Supportive policies and incentives in place at district level to support improved crop and livestock production, food value-chains and INRM. Outcome Indicator: Number of supportive policies and incentives in place at district level to support viable SLM/INRM approaches. Baseline: While some enabling policies are adopted at the national level, their local implementation and application is weak. For example, the land policy is not fully implemented and customary rights are not formally recognized. The pastoral policy remains a draft at national level, and cattle corridors are not formally reestablished. Year: 2016 Output 1.1: Operational multistakeholder platforms are supporting INRM at district and regional levels Indicator: Number of multistakeholder platforms established supporting INRM per district, within which a percentage of women, men, youth, and indigenous people are represented. Baseline: At the moment, there are a few regional stakeholder platforms, such as the donor coordination group spearheaded by the Ministry of Karamoja Affairs, a few ad hoc local NGO coordinating groups, and some private secto Goal: to improve food security by addressing the environmental drivers of food insecurity and their root causes in Karamoja sub-region. Target: A 15% reduction in the number of households suffering from moderate or severe hunger, among which 35% are female headed households, by 2020. Objective: to contribute to enhancing long-term environmental sustainability and resilience of food production systems in the Karamoja Sub-Region Target: A 15 out of 20% increase in productivity of cereals, pulses and vegetables, in all seasons, in 900 hectares by mid-project. Target: A 10% increase in cattle and small stock in all seasons productivity (milk/meat/eggs) by mid-project. OUTCOME 1: Supportive policies and incentives in place at district level to support improved crop and livestock production, food value-chains and INRM. Target: Mechanisms for enhancing the application of SLM/ INRM polices identified, by mid-project Output 1.1: Operational multistakeholder platforms are supporting INRM at district and regional levels Target: An analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities related to multi-stakeholder platforms at the district and regional levels is complete by mid-project. Output 1.2: Adequate legal instruments enabling INRM, land use planning and enforcement in place. Target: A thorough assessment of legal gaps and needs for each district is completed by midproject. OUTCOME 2: Increased land area under integrated natural resources management (INRM) and SLM practices for a more productive Karamoja landscape. Target: 300 ha of cropland, 120 ha of rangeland and 400 ha of forests per district are under INRM / SLM systems, by 2020 (2,460 ha in total) Output 2.1: Institutional technical capacities are strengthened to implement INRM/SLM. Target: At least 16 out of 25 people per district, trained on INRM, among which half are women, by midproject Output 2.2: Increase in the number of community members trained in INRM/SLM techniques Target: 8,000 community members trained in INRM/SLM (soil, water, biodiversity) by midproject, among which half are women Output 2.3: Community groups are benefiting from income-generating activities (IGAs) introduced by the project. Target: At least 1670 community members, of which at least 60% are women, participate in alternative livelihoods schemes and small grant projects addressing SLM/INRM in the broader Karamoja landscape by mid-term. Output 2.4 Community level small grant projects in the Karamoja region that enhance ecosystem services, sustainable land management, innovate alternative livelihood options, are implemented. Target: 50% of grant amount disbursed by mid-term, of which at least 50% is allocated to women and youth groups OUTCOME 3. Framework in place for multi-scale assessment, monitoring and integration of resilience in production landscape and monitoring of GEBs . Target: Low level of available data on resilience and GEBs by mid-project Output 3.1: Assessment and Monitoring of GEBs from project interventions Target: Two M&E exercises by mid-project (baseline,MTR) Output 3.2: Capacity in place to apply appropriate tools and practices for monitoring resilience at multiple scales. Target: Two (2) workshops by midterm on monitoring resilience and building capacity for M&E, within the multistakeholder platforms,to which 50% of participants are women. Output 3.3. Project is linked to Regional Hub program for knowledge generation, exchange and dissemination. Target: At least two (2) thematic knowledge products developed and shared at a regional meeting of the FSIAP programme countries and other platforms. Output 1.1: Operational multi-stakeholder platforms are supporting INRM at district and regional levels 1.1.1 Platforms established to support INRM per district, within which a percentage of women, men, youth, and indigenous people are represented Output 1.2: Adequate legal instruments enabling INRM, land use planning and enforcement in place 1.2.1 00 legal instruments, policies, by-laws applied in Karamoja sub-region enabling INRM, land use planning and enforcement established. OUTCOME 2: Increased land area under integrated natural resources management (INRM) and SLM practices for a more productive Karamoja landscape Output 2.1: Institutional technical capacities are strengthened to implement INRM/SLM 2.1.1 00 people trained on INRM, among which a percentage are women Output 2.2: Increase in the number of community members trained in INRM / SLM techniques 2.2.1. 00 community members trained in INRM and SLM practices, 60% of which are women Output 2.3: Community groups are benefiting from income-generating activities (IGAs) introduced by the project 2.3.1. 00 people participating in alternative livelihoods schemes addressing SLM/INRM in the broader Karamoja landscape, 60% of which are women 2.3.2. No Increase in household incomes measured by household surveys Output 2.4 Community level small grant projects in the Karamoja region that enhance ecosystem services, sustainable land management, innovate alternative livelihood options, are implemented 2.4.1. 08 Community Based organizations received Small grants worth USD 88,000. OUTCOME 3. Framework in place for multi-scale assessment, monitoring and integration of resilience in production landscape and monitoring of GEBs Output 3.1: Assessment and Monitoring of GEBs from project interventions. 3.1.1. 01 monitoring and assessment exercises conducted during the project, within multi-stakeholder platform Output 3.2: Capacity in place to apply appropriate tools and practices for monitoring resilience at multiple scales 3.2.1. Number of workshops held at regional level on monitoring resilience within multi-stakeholder platforms Output 3.3. Project is linked to Regional Hub program for knowledge generation, exchange and dissemination. 3.3.1. The Multi-year project work plan and procurement plan was developed Goal: to improve food security by addressing the environmental drivers of food insecurity and their root causes in Karamoja sub-region. Target: A 20% reduction in the number of households suffering from moderate or severe hunger, among which 35% are female headed households, by 2021. Objective: to contribute to enhancing long-term environmental sustainability and resilience of food production systems in the Karamoja Sub-Region Target: 18 out of 20% increase in productivity of cereals, pulses and vegetables, in all seasons, in 900 hectares by mid-project. Target: A 13% out of 15% increase in cattle and small stock in all seasons productivity (milk/meat/eggs) by 2021. OUTCOME 1: Supportive policies and incentives in place at district level to support improved crop and livestock production, food value-chains and INRM. Target: Mechanisms for enhancing the application of SLM/ INRM polices identified, by 2021 (Post Mid-project Output 1.1: Operational multistakeholder platforms are supporting INRM at district and regional levels Target: An analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities related to multi-stakeholder platforms at the district and regional levels is complete by 2021. Output 1.2: Adequate legal instruments enabling INRM, land use planning and enforcement in place. Target: A thorough assessment of legal gaps and needs for each district is completed by 2021. OUTCOME 2: Increased land area under integrated natural resources management (INRM) and SLM practices for a more productive Karamoja landscape. Target: 375 ha of cropland, 150 ha of rangeland and 500 ha of forests per district are under INRM / SLM systems, by 2021 (2,460 ha in total) Output 2.1: Institutional technical capacities are strengthened to implement INRM/SLM. Target: At 25 people per district, trained on INRM, among which half are women, by 2021 Output 2.2: Increase in the number of community members trained in INRM/SLM techniques Target: 10,000 community members trained in INRM/SLM (soil, water, biodiversity) by midproject, among which half are women Output 2.3: Community groups are benefiting from income-generating activities (IGAs) introduced by the project. Target: At least 2084 out of 2500 community members, of which at least 60% are women, participate in alternative livelihoods schemes and small grant projects addressing SLM/INRM in the broader Karamoja landscape by 2021. Output 2.4 Community level small grant projects in the Karamoja region that enhance ecosystem services, sustainable land management, innovate alternative livelihood options, are implemented. Target: 75% of grant amount disbursed by mid-term, of which at least 75% is allocated to women and youth groups OUTCOME 3. Framework in place for multi-scale assessment, monitoring and integration of resilience in production landscape and monitoring of GEBs . Target: Low level of available data on resilience and GEBs by mid-project Output 3.1: Assessment and Monitoring of GEBs from project interventions Target: Two M&E exercises by mid-project (baseline,MTR) Output 3.2: Capacity in place to apply appropriate tools and practices for monitoring resilience at multiple scales. Target: Two (2) workshops by midterm on monitoring resilience and building capacity for M&E, within the multistakeholder platforms,to which 50% of participants are women. Output 3.3. Project is linked to Regional Hub program for knowledge generation, exchange and dissemination. Target: At least two (2) thematic knowledge products developed and shared at a regional meeting of the FSIAP programme countries and other platforms. Output 1.1: Operational multi-stakeholder platforms are supporting INRM at district and regional levels 1.1.2 Four multi stakeholder platforms formed around four product value chains at S/C Level. 1.1.3 Coherence for INRM and SLM across government policy, planning and decision-making processes and structures reviewed by NEMA. Recommendations for improved policy coherence at district level still under discussion. 1.1.4 28 District officials (53% women) per district trained on INRM and SLM and a gender analysis was done across the project area to inform MSP activities. 1.1.5 Success stories from grantees were documented and a project communication strategy was developed. 1.2.1 Legal frameworks on INRM/SLM are under review with support from Ministry of Justice and no training is yet conducted for policy makers and local leaders 1.2.2 35 CBLUPs and 8 SEAPs validated in a participatory exercise and a framework to align the PUPs with National Frameworks on rangelands is under development 1.2.4 A consulting firm has been contracted to conduct an assessment of the awareness on land rights and capacity building to address identified knowledge gaps in the communities. 2.4.1. 08 Community Based organizations received Small grants worth USD 72,000 and four(4) grant managers were contracted to disburse USD 480,000 to 28CBOs. Capacity building for the CBOs is on-going. 3.1.1 Test tools were developed for local landscape diagnosis types, severity, causes and effectiveness of SLM measures on the ecosystem and livelihoods. Tools are not pre-tested yet. 3.1.4 Training to govt technical and extension staff not yet trained 3.2.1 Participatory M&A not yet done 3.3.1 One presentation made to the regional hub platform, and a joint planning meeting was held with FAO, MAAIF and UNDP. Some stories were captured from the monitoring visit and lessons shall be disseminated after publication. Goal: to improve food security by addressing the environmental drivers of food insecurity and their root causes in Karamoja sub-region. Target: A 25% reduction in the number of households suffering from moderate or severe hunger, among which 35% are female headed households, by end of project. Objective: To contribute to enhancing long-term environmental sustainability and resilience of food production systems in the Karamoja Sub-Region Target: A 20% increase in productivity of maize, sorghum, cassava andsweet potato, vegetables andbeans, in 1,800 hectares by end of project Target: A 15% increase in cattle and small stock productivity (milk/meat/eggs), by end of project. OUTCOME 1: Supportive policies and incentives in place at district level to support improved crop and livestock production, food value-chains and INRM. Target: At least 1 policy or 1 incentive in force to support viable SLM/INRM approaches and related food value chains at landscape level in each selected site, by end of project. Output 1.1: Operational multistakeholder platforms are supporting INRM at district and regional levels Target: At least 1 multi-stakeholder platform per district, supporting INRM, within which at least 30% are women, 30% are men, 20% are youth, and as appropriate 10% are indigenous people to represent communities, by end of project. One operational and comprehensive regional multistakeholder platform that includes meaningful participation by NGOs, private sector, CBOs, CSOs Government and development partners and that is linked to district level platforms, by end of project. Output 1.2: Adequate legal instruments enabling INRM, land use planning and enforcement in place. Target: At least one INRM-enabling legal instrument, policy or by-law under implementation in each district by end of project. OUTCOME 2: Increased land area under integrated natural resources management (INRM) and SLM practices for a more productive Karamoja landscape. Target: 450 ha of cropland, 180 ha of rangeland and 600 ha of forests per district are under INRM / SLM systems, by end of project (4,920 ha in total). Output 2.1: Institutional technical capacities are strengthened to implement INRM/SLM. Target: Not Applicable in 2022 Output 2.2: Increase in the number of community members trained in INRM/SLM techniques Target: 12,000 community members trained in integrated natural resources management and SLM, among which half are women by end of project. Output 2.3: Community groups are benefiting from income-generating activities (IGAs) introduced by the project. Target: At least 2500 community members, of which at least 60% are women, participate in alternative livelihoods schemes and small grant projects addressing SLM/INRM in the broader Karamoja landscape by end of project. Output 2.4 Community level small grant projects in the Karamoja region that enhance ecosystem services, sustainable land management, innovate alternative livelihood options, are implemented. Target: 100% of grant amount disbursed by end of project, at least 50% of which is disbursed to women and youth groups. OUTCOME 3. Framework in place for multi-scale assessment, monitoring and integration of resilience in production landscape and monitoring of GEBs . Target: At least, medium level of available data on resilience and GEBs by the end of the project Output 3.1: Assessment and Monitoring of GEBs from project interventions Target: Three statistically representative M&E exercises conducted and changes analyzed (baseline, mid-term and end of project assessment and monitoring) over the duration of the project per selected landscape, by end of project Output 3.2: Capacity in place to apply appropriate tools and practices for monitoring resilience at multiple scales. Target: At least 1 workshop held per year on monitoring resilience and building capacity for M&E, within the multi-stakeholder platform, among which 50% of participants are women. Output 3.3. Project is linked to Regional Hub program for knowledge generation, exchange and dissemination. Target: At least 5 thematic knowledge products developed and shared at the regional meeting of the FSIAP programme countries and other platforms Output 1.1: Operational multi-stakeholder platforms are supporting INRM at district and regional levels 1.1 Existing policies supportive to SLM/INRM approaches reviewed and appropriate interventions at district levels proposed 1.2 One(1) Multi-stakeholder platform per project district for any of the selected product lines (honey, cassava, livestock or sorghum)created 1.3 35 parish level land use maps printed and disseminated 1.4 water harvesting and storage facilities at established and operationalized at selected sites in each district to incentivize small scale production of crop and livestock 1.5 project audit conducted Output 2.4 Community level small grant projects in the Karamoja region that enhance ecosystem services, sustainable land management, innovate alternative livelihood options, are implemented 2.4.1. 28 Civil Society organizations are practicing SLM / INRM to address land degradation in Karamoja through the Low Value Grants 2.4.2 At least USD 130,000 in Low Value Grants are disbursed to CBOs Output 3.1: Assessment and Monitoring of GEBs from project interventions. 3.1.1.A study to establish the level of resilience and Global environmental Benefits accruing from from project interventions conducted 3.1.2. One participatory M&A workshop at regional level to share information on resilience conducted 3.3.3 Three( 3) knowledge products with the Food Security Integrated Approach Program countries and other platforms developed and shared 3.3.4 36 community Animal Health workers trained to support farmers on management of animal health and equip them with veterinary and A.I kits 3.3.5. Two Joint Project planning and Board meetings held 4.0 Project Management 4.1 Monthly project monitoring conducted 4.2 Project Terminal Evaluation conducted 4.3 Assorted office requirements and office supplies procured and provided to project implementers XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00100437 United Nations Development Programme This project aims to provide environmental benefits and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from improper and inadequate management and treatment of wastewater and organic waste in towns, municipalities and agro-processing industry in Uganda. UGA Min of Energy and Min Devt UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Global Environment Fund Truste registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00103399 United Nations Development Programme NAMA FOR IWM & BIOGAS as Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions for Integrated Waste Management and Biogas in Uganda project. UGA Min of Energy and Min Devt Global Environment Fund Truste UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 0 150958 1895917 1884553 1178199 407383 290889 79955 United Nations Development Programme -3 United Nations Development Programme 147 United Nations Development Programme -3 United Nations Development Programme 9151 United Nations Development Programme 1238 United Nations Development Programme 132108 United Nations Development Programme 13000 United Nations Development Programme 2734 United Nations Development Programme 18384 United Nations Development Programme 372996 United Nations Development Programme 71164 United Nations Development Programme 743889 United Nations Development Programme 2234 United Nations Development Programme 126609 United Nations Development Programme -1019 United Nations Development Programme 65632 United Nations Development Programme 400086 United Nations Development Programme 365282 United Nations Development Programme 268633 United Nations Development Programme 104025 United Nations Development Programme 2698522 UGA Min of Energy and Min Devt Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Project objective: Improved waste management practices in towns and municipalities through the introduction of integrated wastewater treatment plants and biogas digesters. Indicators Indicator 1: Amount (in tonnage) of GHG emission reductions by pilot biogas energy plants and replication (ton CO2eq/yr) Indicator 2: Number of people benefiting from improved organic waste management (TBD) Indicator 3: Amount of financing mobilized for investment in MSW-based biogas energy systems (US$) Indicator 4: Annual volume of electric energy produced by biogas pilots (MWh/yr). Component 1: Establishing enabling market conditions, institutional strengthening and capacity building for improved waste management and promotion of MSW-based biogas systems. Indicators Indicator 1.1: Number of policy and regulatory proposals developed and adopted Indicator 1.2: Number of municipalities (#) reporting increased capacity to undertake IWM, as a result of the projects capacity development activities Indicator 1.3: Multi-stakeholder platform established Component 2: Component 2: Demonstration and investment in integrated wastewater treatment and biogas plants. Indicators: Indicator 2.1: Electricity generating capacity of MSW-based biogas pilot projects (MW). Indicator: 2.2: Number of investments undertaken Component 3: Scale up the use of biogas technologies in other municipalities. Indicators Indicator 3.1: Grant/technical assistance fund and approach to attract investment into MSW-based biogas sector established. Indicator 3.2: Number of MSW-based biogas project concepts prepared (#) Indicator 3.3: Amount of Grants in USD disbursed from the fund (either technical assistance or investment). Component 4: Knowledge Management and Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators: Indicator 4.1: Existence of a functional project website. Indicator 4.2: Number of Knowledge Management products developed and disseminated (#). Indicator 4.3: Standardized baselines for calculating emissions re Project objective: Improved waste management practices in towns and municipalities through the introduction of integrated wastewater treatment plants and biogas digesters. Indicators and baselines Indicator 1: Amount (in tonnage) of GHG emission reductions by pilot biogas energy plants and replication (ton CO2eq/yr) Baseline: 0 tonnes CO2eq: Year (2017) Indicator 2: Number of people benefiting from improved organic waste management Baseline: Zero (0) Year (2017) Indicator 3: Amount of financing mobilized for investment in MSW-based biogas energy systems (US$) Baseline: Zero (0) Year (2017 Indicator 4: Annual volume of electric energy produced by biogas pilots (MWh/yr). Baseline: 0 MWh/yr Component 1: Establishing enabling market conditions, institutional strengthening and capacity building for improved waste management and promotion of MSW-based biogas systems. Indicators and baselines Indicator 1.1: Number of policy and regulatory proposals developed and adopted Baseline: Zero (0) Year (2017) Indicator 1.2: Number of municipalities (#) reporting increased capacity to undertake IWM, as a result of the projects capacity development activities. Baseline: Zero (0) Year (2017) Indicator 1.3: Multi-stakeholder platform established Baseline: Zero (0) Year (2017) Component 2: Component 2: Demonstration and investment in integrated wastewater treatment and biogas plants. Indicators and baseline: Indicator 2.1: Electricity generating capacity of MSW-based biogas pilot projects (MW). Baseline : Zero (0) Megawatts Year (2017) Indicator: 2.2: Number of investments undertaken Baseline : Zero (0) Year (2017) Component 3: Scale up the use of biogas technologies in other municipalities. Indicators and baselines Indicator 3.1: Grant/technical assistance fund and approach to attract investment into MSW-based biogas sector established. Baseline: Zero (0) Year (2017) Indicator 3.2: Number of MSW-based biogas project concepts prepared (#) Baseline: Zero (0) Year (201 Project objective: Improved waste management practices in towns and municipalities through the introduction of integrated wastewater treatment plants and biogas digesters. Indicator 1: Amount (in tonnage) of GHG emission reductions by pilot biogas energy plants and replication (ton CO2eq/yr) Target: 6,100 tonnes CO2eq/yr Indicator 2: Number of people benefiting from improved organic waste management (TBD) Target: 986,250 people Indicator 3: Amount of financing mobilized for investment in MSW-based biogas energy systems (US$) Target: US$ 2,500,000 Million Indicator 4: Annual volume of electric energy produced by biogas pilots (MWh/yr) Taget: 8750 Megawatts Component 1: Establishing enabling market conditions, institutional strengthening and capacity building for improved waste management and promotion of MSW-based biogas systems Indicators and targets Indicator 1.1: Number of policy and regulatory proposals developed and adopted Target: One (1) Policy Indicator 1.2: Number of municipalities (#) reporting increased capacity to undertake IWM, as a result of the projects capacity development activities Target: Six (6) Municipalities Indicator 1.3: Multi-stakeholder platform established Target: One (1) Multi-stakeholder Platform Component 2: Demonstration and investment in integrated wastewater treatment and biogas plants Indicators and targets Indicator 2.1: Electricity generating capacity of MSW-based biogas pilot projects (MW). Target: 1.25 MW of electricity Indicator: 2.2: Number of investments undertaken Target: One (1) investment undertaken Component 3: Scale up the use of biogas technologies in other municipalities Indicators and targets Indicator 3.1. Grant/technical assistance fund and approach to attract investment into MSW-based biogas sector established. Targets: Grant/ technical assistance fund established established. Indicator 3.2: Number of MSW-based biogas project concepts prepared (#) Target: One (1) out of five MSW-based biogas project concepts prepared. Indicator 3.3: Amount of Grants in USD disbursed from the fund (either technical assistance or investment). Target: US$180,000 Component 4: Knowledge Management and Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators and targets Indicator 4.1: Existence of a functional project website. Target: One (1) functional website Indicator 4.2: Number of Knowledge Management products developed and disseminated (#). Target: One (1) knowledge product Indicator 4.3: Standardized baselines for calculating emissions reductions in place. Target: One (1) standardized baseline report Indicator 4.4: NAMA registered on the UNFCCC Registry. Target:UNDP/GEF Project is a registered UNFCCC NAMA for Uganda. Project aim: Improved waste management practices in towns and municipalities through the introduction of integrated wastewater treatment plants and biogas digesters Result 1: Zero (in tonnage) of GHG emission reductions by pilot Biogas energy plants and replication (ton CO2 eq/yr) Result 2: Number of people benefiting from improved organic waste management (TBD) Result: 398 people have benefited from activities of project related to training and sensitization on improved organic waste management. Result 3: Zero amount of financing mobilized for investment in MSW-based Biogas energy systems (US$) Result 4: No Annual volume of electric energy produced by biogas pilots (MWh/Yr) Component 1: Establishing enabling market conditions, institutional strengthening and capacity building for improved waste management and promotion of MSW-based biogas systems. Result 1.1: 05 waste management plans and ordinances/byelaws for 5 Cities of Kampala, Masaka, Jinja, Mbale and Mbarara Result 1.2: Two municipalities, Mbale and Masaka have increased capacity to undertake IWM, as a result of the projects capacity development activities. 04 Cities reporting increased capacity to undertake IWM, as a result of the projects capacity development activities. Result 1.3. A consortium of waste management players/actors consisting of 50 persons from 5 Cities who will be part of the multi-stakeholder platform has been formed. Component 2: Demonstration and investment in integrated wastewater treatment and biogas plants Result 2.1. 0.4MW Electricity generating capacity of MSW-based Biogas pilot projects Kakira Sugar Works (Not attained) Result 2.2. (Zero) 00 investments undertaken. Component 3: Scale up the use of biogas technologies in other municipalities Indicator 3.1: No amount of financing was mobilized for investment in MSW-based biogas energy systems (US$) (0) Result: No Grant/technical assistance fund and approach to attract investment into MSW-based Biogas sector established Indicator 3.2: Annual volume of electric energy produced by biogas pilots (MWh/yr) (2,800 MWh/Yr) Kakira Sugar Works Result : Zero ( 00) MSW-based Biogas project concepts prepared Indicator: Amount of Grants in USD disbursed from the fund (either technical assistance or investment) Result 3.3: 00 Grants in USD disbursed from the fund (either technical assistance or investment). Component 4: Knowledge Management and Monitoring and Evaluation 4.1. A functional project website in place. 4.2. Knowledge Management products developed and disseminated. 4.3. No standardized baselines for calculating emissions reductions in place. 4.4. NAMA registered on the UNFCCC Registry. Project objective: Improved waste management practices in towns and municipalities through the introduction of integrated wastewater treatment plants and biogas digesters. Indicator 1: Amount (in tonnage) of GHG emission reductions by pilot biogas energy plants and replication (ton CO2eq/yr) Target: 12,200 tonnes CO2eq/yr Indicator 2: Number of people benefiting from improved organic waste management (TBD) Target: 7500 people Indicator 3: Amount of financing mobilized for investment in MSW-based biogas energy systems (US$) Target: US$ 6,500,000 Million Indicator 4: Annual volume of electric energy produced by biogas pilots (MWh/yr) Target: 2800 Megawatts Component 1: Establishing enabling market conditions, institutional strengthening and capacity building for improved waste management and promotion of MSW-based biogas systems. Indicators and targets Indicator 1.1: Number of policy and regulatory proposals developed and adopted Target: Two (2) Policy Indicator 1.2: Number of municipalities (#) reporting increased capacity to undertake IWM, as a result of the projects capacity development activities Target: Thirteen (13) Municipalities Indicator 1.3: Multi-stakeholder platform established Target: One (1) Multi-stakeholder Platform Component 2: Demonstration and investment in integrated wastewater treatment and biogas plants Indicators and targets Indicator 2.1: Electricity generating capacity of MSW-based biogas pilot projects (MW). Target: 0.4 MW of electricity from Kakira sugar works Indicator: 2.2: Number of investments undertaken Target: One (1) investment undertaken Component 3: Scale up the use of biogas technologies in other municipalities Indicators and targets Indicator 3.1. Grant/technical assistance fund and approach to attract investment into MSW-based biogas sector established. Targets: Grant/ technical assistance fund established established. Indicator 3.2: Number of MSW-based biogas project concepts prepared (#) Target: One (1) out of five MSW-based biogas project concepts prepared. Indicator 3.3: Amount of Grants in USD disbursed from the fund (either technical assistance or investment). Target: US$180,000 Component 4: Knowledge Management and Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators and targets Indicator 4.1: Existence of a functional project website. Target: One (1) functional website Indicator 4.2: Number of Knowledge Management products developed and disseminated (#). Target: One (1) knowledge product Indicator 4.3: Standardized baselines for calculating emissions reductions in place. Target: One (1) standardized baseline report Indicator 4.4: NAMA registered on the UNFCCC Registry. Target:UNDP/GEF Project is a registered UNFCCC NAMA for Uganda. Project objective: Improved waste management practices in towns and municipalities through the introduction of integrated wastewater treatment plants and biogas digester. Component 1: Establishing enabling market conditions, institutional strengthening and capacity building for improved waste management and promotion of MSW-based biogas systems Result 1.1: National Solid Waste Management Policy was revised to include waste to energy aspects. Result 1.2: At least 15 technical personnel and champions from the four pilot cities of Jinja, Masaka, Mbale and Mbarara were sensitized on integrated waste management approaches through visiting successful cases/sites in KCCA and NWSC. Result 1.3 Waste management plans and waste management ordinances for the Cities of Arua, Hoima, Soroti, Gulu, Lira,Fortportal and Municipalities of Tororo, Masindi, Kabale were reviewed. Result 1.4 Three (3) ordinances i.e for Mbale, jinja and Masaka were submitted to the Solicitor General’s Office for final review Result 1.5: A multi-stakeholder platform for waste management and energy recovery was established . 2..1.Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and feasibility report for KCCA were completed and submitted to NEMA and the Ministry respectively in December 2021 3.1 A gender Strategy and Action Plan was developed for the project 4.3. Data was obtained for computation of standard baselines from stakeholders i.e sugarcane factories and NWSC on the Municipal wastewater plants Project objective: Improved waste management practices in towns and municipalities through the introduction of integrated wastewater treatment plants and biogas digesters. Indicator 1: Amount (in tonnage) of GHG emission reductions by pilot biogas energy plants and replication (ton CO2eq/yr) Target: 50,250 tonnes CO2eq/yr Indicator 2: Number of people benefiting from improved organic waste management (TBD) Target: 993,750 people Indicator 3: Amount of financing mobilized for investment in MSW-based biogas energy systems (US$) Target 3: US$ 9,000,000 Million Indicator 4: Annual volume of electric energy produced by biogas pilots (MWh/yr) Target 4: 11,550 Megawatts Component 1: Establishing enabling market conditions, institutional strengthening and capacity building for improved waste management and promotion of MSW-based biogas systems. Indicators and targets Indicator 1.1: Number of policy and regulatory proposals developed and adopted Target: Two (2) Policies Indicator 1.2: Number of municipalities (#) reporting increased capacity to undertake IWM, as a result of the projects capacity development activities Target: Sixteen (16) Municipalities Indicator 1.3: Multi-stakeholder platform established Target : One (1) Multi-stakeholder Platform Component 2: Demonstration and investment in integrated wastewater treatment and biogas plants Indicators and targets Indicator 2.1: Electricity generating capacity of MSW-based biogas pilot projects (MW). Target: 1.65 MW of electricity from all demonstration sites Indicator: 2.2: Number of investments undertaken Target: One (1) investment undertaken Component 3: Scale up the use of biogas technologies in other municipalities Indicators and targets Indicator 3.1. Grant/technical assistance fund and approach to attract investment into MSW-based biogas sector established. Targets: Grant/ technical assistance fund established established. Indicator 3.2: Number of MSW-based biogas project concepts prepared (#) Target: One (1) out of five MSW-based biogas project concepts prepared. Indicator 3.3: Amount of Grants in USD disbursed from the fund (either technical assistance or investment). Target: US$180,000 Component 4: Knowledge Management and Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators and targets Indicator 4.1: Existence of a functional project website. Target: One (1) functional website Indicator 4.2: Number of Knowledge Management products developed and disseminated (#). Target: One (1) knowledge product Indicator 4.3: Standardized baselines for calculating emissions reductions in place. Target: One (1) standardized baseline report Indicator 4.4: NAMA registered on the UNFCCC Registry. Target:UNDP/GEF Project is a registered UNFCCC NAMA for Uganda. Project objective: Improved waste management practices in towns and municipalities through the introduction of integrated wastewater treatment plants and biogas digesters. 1. Twelve thousand two hundred (12,200) tonnes CO2eq/yr. (0.4MW of electricity is currently produced from the Kakira Sugar Limited plant). 2: One thousand five (1,005); (674 male and 331 female) have directly benefited while, an estimated five million five hundred (5,000,500) people have been reached indirectly through the awareness and sensitization drives carried out by the project using various media platforms. 3: A total of Nineteen million six hundred fourty six thousand five hundred fifty seven USD dollars (US$19,646,557) has been mobilized as equity for construction of Kakira Sugar Limited ($4million) and NWSC ($15,646,557) biogas plants which are now operational. 4: 2,800 MWh/yr from the 0.4 MW biogas plant at Kakira Sugar Limited. Results attained under Component 1: Establishing enabling market conditions, institutional strengthening and capacity building for improved waste management and promotion of MSW-based biogas systems. 1.1 Five (5) draft policy/ ordinances have been developed for the cities of Mbale, Mbarara, Masaka and Jinja pending clearance by the solicitor. 1.2 A total of nineteen (19) urban areas i.e. 11 cities of Jinja, Masaka, Mbale, Kampala, Soroti, Fort Portal, Lira, Gulu, Arua, Hoima and 3 municipalities of Tororo, Masindi, Kabale plus 5 in the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area(GKMA) of Nansana, Mukono, Makindye, Kira and Entebbe are reporting on IWM approaches promoted by the project. 1.3 Two (2) Multi-stakeholder platforms have now been formed by the project – National multi-stakeholders’ platform and GKMA- Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area Technical Working Group. Results attained under Component 2: Demonstration and investment in integrated wastewater treatment and biogas plants 2.1: 0.8MW installed. 0.4MW from Kakira Sugar Works is already being fed into the national grid. Also, 0.4 MW NWSC biogas plant is operational although not feeding electricity into the grid. 2.2: Two (2) investments, i.e. Kakira Sugar Limited biogas plant, and NWSC biogas Plant in Kampala are already in place as demonstration plants. Results attained under Component 3: Scale up the use of biogas technologies in other municipalities 3.1 Utilized seed funds from GEF grant to carry out feasibility studies to establish biogas to electricity plant in KCCA and enhance biogas production in NWSC plant. 3.2 Currently, one project concept for a waste to electricity plant installation at KCCA with possibility of scale up to the other cities of Mbale, Masaka, Mbarara and Jinja has been submitted to the Program preparations committee of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development pending further review by the Ministry of Finance 3.3 About Two Hundred thirty nine thousand eight hundred twenty five US Dollars (USD 239,825) of the seed grant from GEF/UNDP has been disbursed for feasibility studies carried out for KCCA and NWSC as well as characterization and waste flow studies for Mbarara and Mbale Cities Results attained under component 4: Knowledge Management and Monitoring and Evaluation 4.1 The project launched a website in November 2020 and it is functional. The website is also serving as a digital platform for waste sector players. 4.2 One National Training Manual for Sorting Municipal Solid Waste developed and disseminated in collaboration between NEMA and the Ministry of Water and Environment. 4.3 The standardized baselines for computing emission reduction from waste and wastewater is under review by the Climate Change Department under Ministry of Water and Environment pending final review by an international firm. 4.4 The NAMA is registered on the UNFCCC website. Number of policy and regulatory proposals developed and adopted Number of municipalities reporting increased capacity to undertake IWM, as a result of the projects capacity development activities Number of functional platforms established to engage citizens at all levels for sustainable environment and natural resources, disaggregated by category) Biogas to electricity plants to be installed at Kakira Sugar Works, National Water and Sewerage Corporation and Kampala City landfill Number of investments undertaken To prepare project concepts for upscaling biogas power plants to 5 cities Number of Knowledge Management products developed and disseminated XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00104372 United Nations Development Programme The Building Resilient Communities, Wetland Ecosystems and Associated Catchments in Uganda project will restore wetlands and their ecosystem services, will support resilient agricultural practices and alternative livelihoods for communities UGA Min of Water and Env UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Adam Smith International Austrian Development Agency UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GREEN CLIMATE FUND registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00105972 United Nations Development Programme Building Resilient Communities, Wetland Ecosystems and Associated Catchments in Uganda UGA Min of Water and Env GREEN CLIMATE FUND UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Adam Smith International registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 396652 1186938 4503520 7398108 3231963 5443574 4064491 3029315 2082137 2755857 231457 1706 United Nations Development Programme 577397 United Nations Development Programme 161651 United Nations Development Programme 61093 United Nations Development Programme 220761 United Nations Development Programme 97730 United Nations Development Programme 193506 United Nations Development Programme 488323 United Nations Development Programme 718290 United Nations Development Programme 213377 United Nations Development Programme 431553 United Nations Development Programme 169894 United Nations Development Programme 91449 United Nations Development Programme 28027 United Nations Development Programme 290764 United Nations Development Programme 488423 United Nations Development Programme 1823275 United Nations Development Programme 89953 United Nations Development Programme 86619 United Nations Development Programme 31322 United Nations Development Programme 44016 United Nations Development Programme 47082 United Nations Development Programme 121628 United Nations Development Programme 150292 United Nations Development Programme 1353 United Nations Development Programme 1483542 United Nations Development Programme 160423 United Nations Development Programme 263751848 United Nations Development Programme -263399451 United Nations Development Programme 77754 United Nations Development Programme 34034 United Nations Development Programme 107046 United Nations Development Programme 10408 United Nations Development Programme 109838 United Nations Development Programme 612253 United Nations Development Programme 21599 United Nations Development Programme 3292 United Nations Development Programme 2993971 United Nations Development Programme 2320991 United Nations Development Programme 1827170 United Nations Development Programme 1174414 United Nations Development Programme 2428786 United Nations Development Programme 9914 United Nations Development Programme 23018476 UGA Min of Water and Env Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Fund level Impact A1.0: Increased resilience and enhanced livelihoods of the most vulnerable people, communities and regions 1.2: Number (percentage) of households adopting a wider variety of livelihoods strategies/coping mechanisms 1.4: Area (ha) of agricultural land made more resilient to climate change through agricultural practices Fund level Impact A4.0: Improved resilience of ecosystems and ecosystem services 4.1: Area(ha) of habitat or Kilometers of coastline rehabilitated, restored or protected 4.2: Area of agroforestry projects, forest- pastoral systems, or ecosystems -based adaptation systems established or enhanced Project Outcomes: A7.0: Strengthened adaptive capacity and reduced exposure to climate risk 7.1: Use by vulnerable households, communities, businesses and public-sector services of Fund-supported tools, instruments, strategies and activities to respond to climate change and variability 7.2 Number of males and females reached by climate- related early warning systems and other risk reduction measures established/strengthened Project Output 1: Restoration and management of wetland hydrology and associated catchment 1.1: Area (ha) of Wetland and natural grasslands rehabilitated 1.2: Surface area (Ha) restored, rehabilitated or enriched with grassed, herbaceous and wooded vegetation, reducing loss of topsoil, protecting riverbanks and improving infiltration in critical areas Project Output 2: Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment 2.1: Percentage change in agricultural incomes and alternative livelihoods in the project site 2.2: Number of women involved in livelihoods and employability interventions in the project sites Project output 3: Strengthening access to climate and early warning information to farmers and other target communities 3.1: Percentage of population with access to improved climate information and drought, flood and severe storm warning (disaggregated gender) 3.2: Num Baseline year: 2016 Fund level Impact A1.0: Increased resilience and enhanced livelihoods of the most vulnerable people, communities and regions Baseline 1.2: 150 Households with 52% of the household members being female adopted a wider variety of livelihood strategies/coping mechanisms: Year (2016) Baseline 1.4: 30 ha of agricultural land made more resilient to climate change through agricultural practices. Year (2016) Fund level Impact A4.0: Improved resilience of ecosystems and ecosystem services Baseline 4.1: 483ha (South western), 141 ha (Eastern) of wetland restored. 5000ha of catchment restored. Year (2016) Baseline 4.2: 2,000 ha of agroforestry projects, forest- pastoral systems, or ecosystems -based adaptation systems established or enhanced. Year (2016) Project Outcomes: A7.0 Strengthened adaptive capacity and reduced exposure to climate risk Baseline: 7.1: 1000 Households with 52% of the members female use Fund-supported tools, instruments, strategies and activities. Year (2016) Baseline 7.2: 1300 females and 1650 males reached by climate- related early warning systems and other risk reduction measures established/strengthened. Year (2016) Project Output 1: Restoration and management of wetland hydrology and associated catchment Baseline 1.1: 525Ha of Wetland and natural grasslands rehabilitated. Year (2016) Baseline 1.2: 2000 ha of catchment restored, rehabilitated or enriched with grassed Year (2016) Project Output 2: Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment Baseline 2.1: 30% (100 Households) increase in agricultural incomes and alternative livelihoods in the project sites. Year (2016) Baseline 2.2: Two hundred twenty found (244) women involved in livelihoods and employability interventions in the project sites. Year (2016) Project output 3: Strengthening access to climate and early warning information to farmers and other target communities Baseline 3.1: 20% (of the total project area p Fund level Impact A1.0: Increased resilience and enhanced livelihoods of the most vulnerable people, communities and regions 1.2: 11,428 Households with 10% of households adopting a wider variety of livelihoods strategies/coping mechanisms 1.4: 2,500 (ha) of agricultural land made more resilient to climate change through agricultural practices Fund level Impact A4.0: Improved resilience of ecosystems and ecosystem services 4.1: 16,000 (ha) of habitat or Kilometers of coastline rehabilitated, restored or protected 4.2: 500 ha of agroforestry projects, forest- pastoral systems, or ecosystems -based adaptation systems established or enhanced Project Outcomes: A7.0: Strengthened adaptive capacity and reduced exposure to climate risk 7.1: 10% use by vulnerable households, communities, businesses and public-sector services of Fund-supported tools, instruments, strategies and activities to respond to climate change and variability 7.2. 800,000 males and females reached by climate- related early warning systems and other risk reduction measures established/strengthened Project Output 1: Restoration and management of wetland hydrology and associated catchment 1.1: 16,000 (ha) of Wetland and natural grasslands rehabilitated 1.2: 500 (Ha) restored, rehabilitated or enriched with grassed, herbaceous and wooded vegetation, reducing loss of topsoil, protecting riverbanks and improving infiltration in critical areas Project Output 2: Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment 2.1: 10% change in agricultural incomes and alternative livelihoods in the project site 2.2: 4,000 women involved in livelihoods and employability interventions in the project sites Project output 3: Strengthening access to climate and early warning information to farmers and other target communities 3.1: 20% of population with access to improved climate information and drought, flood and severe storm warning (disaggregated gender) 3.2: 41 early flood warning systems installed in vulnerable communities Fund level Impact A1.0: Increased resilience and enhanced livelihoods of the most vulnerable people, communities and regions 2020 targets: 1.2: 6856 Households with 06% of household members being female adopting a wider variety of livelihoods strategies/coping mechanisms 1.4: 05 (ha) of agricultural land made more resilient to climate change through agricultural practices Fund level Impact A4.0: Improved resilience of ecosystems and ecosystem services 4.1: 16,000 (ha) of habitat or Kilometers of coastline rehabilitated, restored or protected 4.2: 500 ha of agroforestry projects, forest- pastoral systems, or ecosystems -based adaptation systems established or enhanced Project Outcomes: A7.0: Strengthened adaptive capacity and reduced exposure to climate risk. 7.1: 10% use by vulnerable households, communities, businesses and public-sector services of Fund-supported tools, instruments, strategies and activities to respond to climate change and variability 7.2. 487 females and 313males reached by climate- related early warning systems and other risk reduction measures established/strengthened Project Output 1: Restoration and management of wetland hydrology and associated catchment 1.1: 10,000 ha (6,370 Western and 3,630 Eastern Uganda of Wetland and natural grasslands rehabilitated 1.2: 00 (Ha) restored, rehabilitated or enriched with grassed, herbaceous and wooded vegetation, reducing loss of topsoil, protecting riverbanks and improving infiltration in critical areas Project Output 2: Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment 2.1: 06%% change in agricultural incomes and alternative livelihoods in the project site 2.2: 3,089 women involved in livelihoods and employability interventions in the project sites Project output 3: Strengthening access to climate and early warning information to farmers and other target communities 3.1: 20% of population with access to improved climate information and drought, flood and severe storm warning (disaggregated gender) 3.2: 25 early flood warning systems installed in vulnerable communities Fund level Impact A1.0: Increased resilience and enhanced livelihoods of the most vulnerable people, communities and regions 1.2: 15500 Households with 52 % of the household members being female adopting a wider variety of livelihood strategies/coping mechanisms. 1.4: 4,000 (ha) of agricultural land made more resilient to climate change through agricultural practices Fund level Impact A4.0: Improved resilience of ecosystems and ecosystem services 4.1: 10,000 ha (South western), 12,021 ha (Eastern) of wetland restored. 5500ha of catchment restored. 4.2: 5500ha of agroforestry projects, forest- pastoral systems, or ecosystems -based adaptation systems established or enhanced Project Outcomes: A7.0: Strengthened adaptive capacity and reduced exposure to climate risk 7.1: 15,500 Households with 52% of the members female use Fund-supported tools, instruments, strategies and activities 7.2. 800,000 males and females reached by climate- related early warning systems and other risk reduction measures established/strengthened Project Output 1: Restoration and management of wetland hydrology and associated catchment 1.1: 22,021 ha of wetland and natural grasslands rehabilitated 1.2: 5500 (Ha) restored, rehabilitated or enriched with grassed, herbaceous and wooded vegetation, reducing loss of topsoil, protecting riverbanks and improving infiltration in critical areas Project Output 2: Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment 2.1: 50% change in agricultural incomes and alternative livelihoods in the project site 2.2: 2,440 women involved in livelihoods and employability interventions in the project sites Project output 3: Strengthening access to climate and early warning information to farmers and other target communities 3.1: 40% of population with access to improved climate information and drought, flood and severe storm warning (disaggregated gender) 3.2: 16 early flood warning systems installed in vulnerable communities Fund level Impact A1.0: Increased resilience and enhanced livelihoods of the most vulnerable people, communities and regions 1.2: 15500 Households with 52 % of the household members being female adopting a wider variety of livelihood strategies/coping mechanisms. 1.4: 4,000 (ha) of agricultural land made more resilient to climate change through agricultural practices Fund level Impact A4.0: Improved resilience of ecosystems and ecosystem services 4.1: 6,885ha (South Western) and 4,800ha (Eastern) of wetland was restored. 400ha of catchment area was restored. 4.2: 5500ha of agroforestry projects, forest- pastoral systems, or ecosystems -based adaptation systems established or enhanced Project Outcomes: A7.0: Strengthened adaptive capacity and reduced exposure to climate risk 7.1: 15,500 Households with 52% of the members female use Fund-supported tools, instruments, strategies and activities 7.2. 5,000 males and females reached by climate- related early warning systems and other risk reduction measures established/strengthened Project Output 1: Restoration and management of wetland hydrology and associated catchment 1.1: 11,685ha of wetland and natural grasslands rehabilitated 1.2: 400 (Ha) restored, rehabilitated or enriched with grassed, herbaceous and wooded vegetation, reducing loss of topsoil, protecting riverbanks and improving infiltration in critical areas Project Output 2: Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment 2.1: 12% change in agricultural incomes and alternative livelihoods in the project site 2.2: 1,466 women involved in livelihoods and employability interventions in the project sites Project output 3: Strengthening access to climate and early warning information to farmers and other target communities 3.1: 50% of population with access to improved climate information and drought, flood and severe storm warning (disaggregated gender) 3.2: 16 early flood warning systems installed in vulnerable communities Project Output 1: Restoration and management of wetland hydrology and associated catchment Target 1.1: 30,000 ha of wetland and natural grasslands rehabilitated Target 1.2: 6500 (Ha) restored, rehabilitated, or enriched with grassed, herbaceous, and wooded vegetation, reducing loss of topsoil, protecting riverbanks, and improving infiltration in critical areas Project Output 2: Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment Target 2.1: 20% change in agricultural incomes and alternative livelihoods in the project site Target 2.2: 1,904 women involved in livelihoods and employability interventions in the project sites Project Output 3: Strengthening access to climate and early warning information to farmers and other target communities Target 3.1: 30% of the population with access to improved climate information and drought, flood, and severe storm warning (disaggregated gender) Project Output 1: Restoration and management of wetland hydrology and associated catchment 1.1: Target: 30,000 ha of wetland and natural grasslands rehabilitated. Result: 15,464 hectares were restored (6,538 ha for the Western and 8,926 ha for the Eastern region). Target 1.2: 6500 (Ha) restored, rehabilitated/enriched with grassed, herbaceous & wooded vegetation, reducing loss of topsoil, protecting riverbanks, and improving infiltration in critical areas Result: 1205 ha of the degraded catchment for Kidubule – Ibamba wetland in Rubirizi district wer restored. Project Output 2: Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment Target 2.1: 20% change in agricultural incomes and alternative livelihoods in the project site Result: 7% change in agricultural incomes and alternative livelihoods in the project site Target 2.2: 1,904 women involved in livelihoods and employability interventions in the project sites Result: 1,151 women involved in livelihoods and employability interventions in the project sites Project Output 3: Strengthening access to climate and early warning information to farmers and other target communities Target 3.1: 30% of the population with access to improved climate information and drought, flood, and severe storm warning (disaggregated gender). Result: 8% of the population with access to improved climate information and drought, flood, and severe storm warning This indicator measures the percentage of households adopting a wider variety of livelihood strategies/coping mechanisms within the project areas The indicator tracks the total count of women participating in specific project activities/initiatives aimed at enhancing their livelihoods and employability. This indicator will show the percentage of males and females reached by climate-related early warning systems and other risk reduction measures. XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00126785 United Nations Development Programme This project seeks to support the Government of Uganda to restore wetlands and associated catchments by promoting catchment based integrated, equitable and sustainable management of water and related resources. UGA Min of Water and Env UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Austrian Development Agency registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 23386 845696 1194549 325841 571317 25 United Nations Development Programme 7167 United Nations Development Programme 1835 United Nations Development Programme 6829 United Nations Development Programme 18813 United Nations Development Programme -16709 United Nations Development Programme 206 United Nations Development Programme 20234 United Nations Development Programme 37644 United Nations Development Programme 2699 United Nations Development Programme 5940 United Nations Development Programme 102327 United Nations Development Programme 15650 United Nations Development Programme 125894 United Nations Development Programme 198416 United Nations Development Programme 12268 United Nations Development Programme 25606 United Nations Development Programme 57628 United Nations Development Programme 14629 United Nations Development Programme 64329 United Nations Development Programme 1224 United Nations Development Programme 11763 United Nations Development Programme 77742 United Nations Development Programme 9060 United Nations Development Programme 50183 United Nations Development Programme 188149 United Nations Development Programme 159889 United Nations Development Programme 33665 United Nations Development Programme 46405 United Nations Development Programme 67199 United Nations Development Programme 14720 United Nations Development Programme 21844 United Nations Development Programme 135619 United Nations Development Programme 9083 United Nations Development Programme 4059 United Nations Development Programme 1058 United Nations Development Programme 133 United Nations Development Programme 278913 United Nations Development Programme 333298 United Nations Development Programme -107270 Austrian Development Agency United Nations Development Programme 2193899 Austrian Development Agency United Nations Development Programme 1984015 UGA Min of Water and Env Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Output 1: Degraded Wetlands, natural grasslands, and associated catchments restored and or rehabilitated and intact wetlands protected Indicator 1.1: Area of 6,705 Ha of degraded wetlands restored Indicator 1.2: Area of 1422 (Ha) of degraded catchment restored and/or rehabilitated Indicator 1.3: Five (5) intact wetlands protected Output 2 Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment Indicator 2.1(a) 33,000 (At least 30% women) household heads disaggregated by sex and social determinants (age, disability) benefiting from agricultural incomes in the project sites Indicator 2.1(b) 33,000 (At least 30% women) household heads disaggregated by sex and social determinants (age, disability) that are benefiting from alternative livelihoods introduced by the project Indicator 2.2: Percentage of women who benefit/have control of livelihood interventions such as water and household incomes in the project sites (50% of people involved are women). Output 3: Knowledge Management and Communication Activity Result 3: Effective documentation and sharing of project results and lessons learned Indicator 3.1: Effective documentation and sharing of project results and lessons learned Intended Outcome as stated in UNDAF: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed and protected, and people, especially the vulnerable and marginalized, have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. Output 1: Degraded Wetlands, natural grasslands and associated catchments restored and or rehabilitated and intact wetlands protected. Indicator: 1.1: Area (Ha) of degraded wetlands restored Baseline: Zero (0) Year: 2020 Indicator 1.2 : Area (Ha) of degraded catchment restored and/or rehabilitated Baseline: Zero (0) Year : 2020 Indicator 1.3: Number of intact wetlands protected Baseline : Zero (0) Year 2020 Output 2: Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment Indicator 2.1(a) Number of household heads disaggregated by sex and social determinants (age, disability) benefiting from agricultural incomes in the project sites. Indicator 2.1 (b) Number of household heads disaggregated by sex and social determinants (age, disability) that are benefiting from Baseline: Zero (0)Year 2020 Indicator 2.2: Percentage of women who benefit / have control of livelihood interventions such as water and household incomes in the project sites. Baseline :TBD Year 2022 Output 3: Knowledge Management and Communication Activity Result 3: Effective documentation and sharing of project results and lessons learned Indicator: Effective documentation and sharing of project results and lessons learned Baseline: Zero (0) 2020 N/A N/A Output 1: Degraded Wetlands, natural grasslands, and associated catchments restored and or rehabilitated and intact wetlands protected Target 1.1: Area of 1,341 Ha of degraded wetlands restored Target 1.2 Area of 605 (Ha) of degraded catchment restored and/or rehabilitated Target 1.3: 2 intact wetlands protected Output 2 Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment Target 2.1(a): 11,000 (At least 30% women) household heads disaggregated by sex and social determinants (age, disability) benefiting from agricultural incomes in the project sites Target 2.1(b): 11,000 (At least 30% women) household heads disaggregated by sex and social determinants (age, disability) that are benefiting from alternative livelihoods introduced by the project Target 2.2: Percentage of women who benefit/have control of livelihood interventions such as water and household incomes in the project sites (50% of people involved are women) Project inception was conducted in August 2021. Consequently, the period August to De-cember 2021 was used to implement preparatory activities and restoration work was re-scheduled to 2022. Output 1: Degraded wetlands, and associated catchments restored and or rehabilitated and intact wetlands protected This output was not accomplished. It was affected by demarcation that was not done. The restoration process starts with demarcation of wetland boundaries. Catchment areas are equally mapped up at this point in time. The catchments were not mapped out for restoration or rehabilitation. This will be done after demarcation. Output 2: Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland and associated catchment areas promoted This output has been implemented to a small extent. A number of processes were started but have not yet contributed to the indicator result. This can be attributed to the late start of implementation. Output 1: Degraded Wetlands, natural grasslands, and associated catchments restored and or rehabilitated and intact wetlands protected Target 1.1: Area of 4,706 Ha of degraded wetlands restored Target 1.2: Area of 606 (Ha) of degraded catchment restored and/or rehabilitated Target: Three (3) intact wetlands protected Output 2 Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland catchment Target 2.1(a): 22,000 (At least 30% women) household heads disaggregated by sex and social determinants (age, disability) benefiting from agricultural incomes in the project sites Target 2.1(b): 11,000 (At least 30% women) household heads disaggregated by sex and social determinants (age, disability) that are benefiting from alternative livelihoods introduced by the project. Target 2.2: Percentage of women who benefit/have control of livelihood interventions such as water and household incomes in the project sites (50% of people involved are women). Since Project inception in August 2021, preparatory activities commenced and are on going. Output 1: Degraded wetlands, and associated catchments restored and or rehabilitated and intact wetlands protected This output was not accomplished. 5 wetlands were identified and demarcation is ongoing. The restoration process will commence after demarcation. Result 1.2: The process of mapping catchment areas is done. Plans are underway to restore catchments through tree planting, establishment of nurseries. Catchment management planning with communities and soil and water conservation measures will be implemented next year. Output 2: Improved agricultural practices and alternative livelihood options in the wetland and associated catchment areas promoted. Results achieved under output 2 Establishment of demonstration gardens and farming groups to adopt climate resilient / climate smart agricultural practices is underway. This includes installation of portable irrigation systems which will be replicated on members of the farmer groups who are being mobilized. The project will support these farmer groups through hands on training and provision of inputs and implements. The indicator assesses the total area of degraded land (including wetlands) that is effectively protected against further degradation. The protection is ensured by community bylaws, regulations enforced by community members and relevant authorities, individual farmers applying sustainable wetland protection measures and other means. The indicator assesses the total area of catchment land that is effectively protected against further degradation. The protection is ensured by community bylaws, regulations enforced by community members and relevant authorities, individual farmers applying sustainable agricultural practices and other means. A catchment area of wetlands is an area of land, usually bounded by natural features such as hills or mountains, from which surface and sub-surface water flows into streams, rivers, and wetlands. It is also known as a watershed area, drainage area, drainage basin, basin, or catchment. Number of household heads disaggregated by sex and social determinants (age, disability) benefiting from agricultural incomes in the project sites. XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00111060 United Nations Development Programme Enhancing Resilience of Agriculture landscape and value chains in Uganda with outputs 1,2 and 3(CSA technologies and practices, CSA approaches are promoted, and organizational arrangements and capacities are strengthened. National Execution UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME COMESA UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00110206 United Nations Development Programme Enhancing Resilience of Agriculture landscape and value chains in Uganda with outputs 1,2 and 3(CSA technologies and practices, CSA approaches are promoted, and organizational arrangements and capacities are strengthened. National Execution UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME COMESA registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 101 105 72469 653043 296456 443900 100 United Nations Development Programme 173544 United Nations Development Programme 516089 United Nations Development Programme 188838 United Nations Development Programme 330176 United Nations Development Programme -16144 COMESA United Nations Development Programme 14816 COMESA United Nations Development Programme -11273 COMESA United Nations Development Programme 1208748 National Execution Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). 1.1 number of cooperative members / farmers integrating CSA practices and using sustainable production technologies 1.2 number of hectares under conservation agriculture practices 1.3 km of soil and water conservation bands constructed 1.4 existence of a functional M&E framework (with regular generation, dissemination and use of update data; disaggregated by gender, location, etc where applicable) that has integrated value chain approach indicators 2.1 number of active school CSA clubs; and number of schools integrating CSA practices into their curricular & co-curricular activities mainly school gardening 2.2 Ha of school gardens integrating CSA practices and technologies. 3.1 number of functional platforms established/strengthen that engage stakeholders / enterprises value chain actors for the implementation of CSA, including, mainstream gender responsive actions/practices. 3.2 existence of a strategy, that is gender inclusive, for access of CSA technology inputs & services 3.3 number of districts that have functional CSA taskforces actively coordinating, monitoring and facilitating partnerships building for the implementation of CSA activities number of functional farmer cooperative enterprises in place 3.4 existence of a functional M&E framework (with regular generation, dissemination and use of update data; disaggregated by gender, location, etc where applicable) that has integrated value chain approach indicators. 1.1: 2 groups 1.2 : 3000 Ha 1.3: 12 Km 1.4: CSA M&E system in place but not functional 2.1: 0 2.2: 0 3.1: - no functional platforms 3.2:- no strategy 3.3: 0 3.4: CSA M&E system in place but not functional Output 1. By 2021, CSA practices are up scaled and monitored in seven districts in eastern Uganda 1.2 Build capacity of 15 cooperatives to access revolving fund and matching grants and distribute revolving funds 1.3 Build capacity of 15cooperatives to access and use draught and tractor driven rippers 1.4 Support farmer field days for cross learning 1.5 Establish 30 micro irrigation units and conduct trainings on irrigation practices 1.6 promote production of Neem tree seedlings and use of Neem seed pesticides. Output 2. By 2021, CSA approaches are promoted in selected schools in the seven districts in Eastern Uganda 2.1 Develop CSA manual to guide teachers and pupils 2.2 Support the set up of school gardens & practical skilling of pupils and teachers in CSA technologies, practices and approaches in the selected schools 2.3 Support development of school clubs Output 3. By 2021, the organizational arrangements and capacities are strengthened for implementation of CSA and management of strategic value chains. 3.1 Support the functioning of CSA taskforce for better coordination and monitoring of CSA activities 3.3Facilitate growth of 3 value chains for growth of partnerships and development of action plans. 3.4 Provide matching grants to promote investments by farmer cooperatives in CSA mechanization practices, produce bulking, post-harvest handling and value addition 1.2 Capacity of 15 cooperatives built to access revolving funds and matching grants but distribution of the grants not yet done. 1.3 Capacity of 15cooperatives to access and use draught driven rippers was done but not for tractor driven rippers 1.4 Farmer Field days for cross learning were not done because of COVID restrictions 1.5 Establishment of micro-irrigation units is at procurement stage with specifications developed 1.6 Production of Neem tree seedlings is on-going although was delayed by seed collection season and use of Neem seed pesticides has not yet taken off 2.1 Development of CSA Manual to guide teachers and pupils is at procurement of consultant. 2.2 Setting of school gardens and practical skilling of pupils and teachers was not done because of interaction of COVID-19 Output 1. By 2021, CSA practices are up scaled and monitored in seven districts in eastern Uganda 1.2 Build capacity of 15 cooperatives to access revolving fund and matching grants and distribute revolving funds 1.2.4 Disburse revolving fund grants to 15 cooperatives to procure quality inputs for savers to access on favourable loan conditions 1.2.5 Capacity Building and monitoring performance of cooperatives and revolving fund utilization 1.2.6 Procure visibility materials for cooperatives and the project (T-shirts, brochures, posters, harddisks) 1.4.1 Support 7 farmer open days to share and learn about good CSA practices 1.5.3 Establish at least 30 demonstration of micro irrigation units and capacity building for the users) 1.6.1. Demonstrate use of neem tree bio-pesticide among the 15 cooperatives 1.6.2 Support production of neem tree seedlings for farmer planting (7 nurseries : seeds, inputs, materials, equipment and tools) 1.8.1 Local Consultant to document and evaluate CSA best practices 1.8.5 Project quarterly review meeting, bi-annual board meetings Output 2. By 2021, CSA approaches are promoted in selected schools in the seven districts in Eastern Uganda 2.1.1 Develop an illustrative manual (handbook) and communication strategy on CSA practices 2.1.2 Establish and Monitor CSA demonstration gardens in 14 schools. 2.2.2 Support school club activities (awareness and learning) 2.3.1 Support monitoring mission by MoE and District Education officers to assess integration of CSA practices in schools extra curricular activities 3.1 Functional platforms established/strengthened to engage stakeholders / enterprises value chain actors for the implementation of CSA, including, mainstream gender responsive actions/practices. 3.1.1 Support the functioning of National CSA taskforce to guide project on value chains developments, and for better coordination and monitoring of CSA activities 3.1.2 Support the functioning of District CSA taskforce to guide project on value chains developments, and for better coordination and monitoring of CSA activities 3.2 A gender inclusive strategy for access of CSA technology inputs & services established 3.2.1 Facilitate a team of district and national level taskforces to analyze and develop gender responsive actions to strengthen stakeholder engagements across the strategic value chains (pulses, cereals, fruits, neem tree products) 3.2.2 Facilitate three sub-regional level platforms (grain, fruit, and neem enterprises) for value chain actors to form, develop action plans, and exhibit CSA agro inputs, products, technologies, and services for CSA cooperatives to establish partnership contracts 3.2.3 Capacity Building & Monitoring Mission Support to 15 interns to support cooperatives on ICT and compile data/information to present at platform meetings 3.3.1 Facilitate cross learning visits by the 15 cooperatives focusing on organised marketing, savings and credit management, good documentation practices and performing cottage processing and value addition industries of similar enterprises 3.3.2 Support extension (coordination, supervision, backstopping and monitoring) by PMU and partners to CSA activities in cooperatives and schools 3.3.3 Facilitate hands on trainings in post-harvesting, processing, value addition, value addition, and processing hygiene and sanitation 3.4.1 Provide matching grants to meet investing requirements of the 15 cooperatives 3.4.2 Facilitate investment in post harvest handling equipment for grain / pulse and neem product processing 4.0 Terminal Evaluation conducted 1.2.4 Revolving fund grants worth USD 64,492 were disbursed to 15 cooperatives and inputs were procured by each cooperative. 1.2.5 Capacity of cooperatives to utilize revolving funds was built and performance was monitored 1.2.6 Visibility materials including T-shirts, umbrellas and bags were procured and distributed to cooperatives 1.4.1 Farmer open days were not carried out because of COVID-19 restrictions on congregation 1.5.3 Thirty (30) micro-irrigation demonstration sites established and users trained 1.6.1 Demonstration of the use of neem-tree biopesticides to 15cooperatives was done 1.6.2 Seven (7) tree nurseries established and production of neem tree seedlings supported . Up to 7000 tree seedlings produced and planted on farm boundaries 1.8.1 CSA best practices documented 1.8.5 One quarterly review and 1 board meeting held during the year 2.1.1 An illustrative manual and communication strategy on CSA developed 2.1.2 Demonstration gardens were NOT established in the 14 schools but schools were supported to procure equipment to use in establishing the school gardens 2.2.2 School clubs activities were supported to procure awareness materials to be used when the schools open 2.3.1 Monitoring visit by MoE was NOT carried out as schools remained closed 3.1.1 National CSA taskforce activities on value chains developments, and for better coordination and monitoring of CSA activities supported 3.1.2 District CSA taskforce activities on value chains developments, and for better coordination and monitoring of CSA activities supported 3.2.2 Sub-regional level platforms for grain, fruit, and neem enterprises for value chain actors facilitated with capacity building 3.2.3 Capacity of 15 interns built to support the cooperatives. 3.4.1 Matching grants worth USD 85,365 provided to cooperatives and used for acquisition of value addition equipment 3.4.2 Investments in postharvest handling facilities worth USD 18,743 and several physical equipment 4.0 Terminal Evaluation of the project conducted Project technically closed December 2021 Project technically closed December 2021 XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00118810 United Nations Development Programme Enhancing Conjunctive Management of Surface and Groundwater Resources in Selected Transboundary Aquifers: Case Study for Selected Shared Groundwater Bodies in the Nile Basin Non-Governmental Organisation UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Global Environment Fund Truste registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00115472 United Nations Development Programme Enhancing Conjunctive Management of Surface and Groundwater Resources in Selected Transboundary Aquifers: Case Study for Selected Shared Groundwater Bodies in the Nile Basin Non-Governmental Organisation Global Environment Fund Truste UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 628819 1840736 925185 636420 1683359 1473875 162453 293503 United Nations Development Programme 112501 United Nations Development Programme 91414 United Nations Development Programme 130794 United Nations Development Programme 1672 United Nations Development Programme 79654 United Nations Development Programme 2056 United Nations Development Programme 1135 United Nations Development Programme 1911 United Nations Development Programme 1499 United Nations Development Programme 4239 United Nations Development Programme 87122 United Nations Development Programme 109509 United Nations Development Programme 8542 United Nations Development Programme 7265 United Nations Development Programme 45171 United Nations Development Programme 129747 United Nations Development Programme 176236 United Nations Development Programme 2072 United Nations Development Programme 103162 United Nations Development Programme 39486 United Nations Development Programme 276 United Nations Development Programme 144430 United Nations Development Programme -8881 United Nations Development Programme 110901 United Nations Development Programme 90236 United Nations Development Programme 124657 United Nations Development Programme 51507 United Nations Development Programme 40252 United Nations Development Programme -3940 United Nations Development Programme 3940 United Nations Development Programme 944139 United Nations Development Programme 494536 United Nations Development Programme 34649 United Nations Development Programme 5206337 Non-Governmental Organisation Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Project Objective: To enhance knowledge and capacity for sustainable use and management of transboundary aquifers and aquifers of regional significance in the Nile Basin. Indicator 1: Extent to which legal or policy or institutional frameworks are in place for conservation, sustainable use, and access and benefit sharing of natural resources, biodiversity and ecosystems. Indicator 2: Number of countries with legal, policy and institutional frameworks in place for conservation, sustainable use, and access and benefit sharing of natural resources, biodiversity and ecosystems Indicator 3: Number ( #) of direct project beneficiaries. Component 1: Enhance current understanding and the knowledge on the resources base, threats and options for sustainable management and utilization of shared aquifers. Outcome 1: Improved understanding and knowledge of groundwater and how it interacts with surface water and the types of pressures on them, building upon existing information Outcome Indicators Outcome indicator 1.1: Number of countries (shared aquifers) with Shared Aquifer Diagnostic Analysis (SADA) report completed. (Aquifers diagnostic analysis (SADA) report for all the selected shared aquifers that serves as baseline fact-based analysis of current status of the aquifers (threats, immediate causes, root causes, use/abstraction; surface-groundwater connection, socio economics) with gender disaggregated data collection factoring also climate change and extreme climate events] Outcome indicator 1.2: Harmonized and standardized groundwater knowledge-base (geodatabase and maps) for all the three shared aquifers in place with all pertinent information. Outcome Indicator 1.3: Water balance model describing/coupling SW-GW interaction and groundwater availability projected under different climate change, sociology-economic pathways (SEPs), and land use-land cover change scenarios developed and used for decision making. Outputs: Output 1.1: Shared aquifers diagnostic analy Project Objective: To enhance knowledge and capacity for sustainable use and management of transboundary aquifers and aquifers of regional significance in the Nile Basin. Indicator 1: Extent to which legal or policy or institutional frameworks are in place for conservation, sustainable use, and access and benefit sharing of natural resources, biodiversity and ecosystems. Baseline: There is no legal or policy framework with regard to transboundary groundwater; some member state countries have singed the international resolution on transboundary aquifers Indicator 2: Number of countries with legal, policy and institutional frameworks in place for conservation, sustainable use, and access and benefit sharing of natural resources, biodiversity and ecosystems. Baseline: No Baseline Indicator 3: Number ( #) of direct project beneficiaries. Baseline: 1, 000,000 people Component 1: Enhance current understanding and the knowledge on the resources base, threats and options for sustainable management and utilization of shared aquifers. Outcome 1: Improved understanding and knowledge of groundwater and how it interacts with surface water and the types of pressures on them, building upon existing information Baseline:There is no SADA report on any of the aquifers [There is some general knowledge of the geology, including subsurface stratigraphy relevant to the three aquifers. However, the Member state countries lack: (i) a standardized, modern and harmonized characterization of the current state of groundwater resources and its interaction with surface water, (ii) a set of quantity, quality, ecological functions, socio-economic factors and current uses, and (iii) the assessment of the vulnerability to pollution and climate and land use changes] Outcome Indicators and baseline Outcome indicator 1.1: Number of countries (shared aquifers) with Shared Aquifer Diagnostic Analysis (SADA) report completed. Baseline: There is no SADA report on any of the aquifers. Outcome ind Project Objective:To enhance knowledge and capacity for sustainable use and management of transboundary aquifers and aquifers of regional significance in the Nile Basin Objective targets Target 1: Updated information on national policies/institutions to protect /conserve transboundary aquifers and associated ecosystems Target 2: 50% level of completion of 2nd GEF PIR 50% (note at least 50% of the beneficiary are women) Component 1: Enhance current understanding and the knowledge on the resources base, threats and options for sustainable management and utilization of shared aquifers. Outcome 1: Improved understanding and knowledge of groundwater and how it interacts with surface water and the types of pressures on them, building upon existing information Target for outcome 1 Target 1.1: Evaluation, harmonization and validation of all previous findings from local literature, published sources, and from international knowledge repositories (e.g. IGRAC, BGS, BGR, IGAD) compiled in a report format. Targets for Outcome indicator 1.2 Target 1: Identified and Quality checked Target 2: Design of geodata base for the selected aquifers Target 3: Data collection mechanism (training workshops) activated in the 7 countries. Target 4: Quality check of the collected data conducted and control procedures developed Target for Outcome Indicator 1.3: Target 1: Suitability of various models assessed Target 2: Data for model inputs compiled and completed Target 3: Isotope hydrology studies for conceptual model development conducted Component 2: Development of action plans on groundwater resources governance, management, and protection for inclusion in national, sub-basin and basin wide frameworks: also including consideration of surface water/groundwater resources conjunctive use. Targets under outcome 2 ( target for Indicators 2.1, 2.2 & 2.3) Target 2.1 a): Assessment review of -national policy environment and groundwater management approaches in each country pertaining to the aquifers. Target 2.1): One (1) stakeholders diagnostic is carried out in early stages of project (e.g. sex-disaggregated data collected) in order to e.g. identify stakeholder groups to involve in project (e.g. water users, farmers, private sector, women’s groups). Target.2.2: One (1) assessment/enumeration of all groundwater monitoring approaches (modern RS techniques, telemetric monitoring, customary practices etc) worldwide in Nile context conducted Target 2.3: Compilation and assessment of existing practices in MAR, Water quality protection, and conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater completed and prepared. Outcome 3: NBI’s subsidiary action programs (Eastern Nile and Nile Equatorial Lakes sub-basin) will be strengthened through integration of groundwater aspects for selected sub basins Indicators: Target 3.1: Sufficient evidence (technical, social, economic) to feed into to the technical guide gathered. Component 3: Targeted pilot projects to explore conjunctive use of surface and groundwaters, and links to biodiversity conservation and climate change adaptation. Outcome 4: Broad dissemination of the results from two pilot actions lead to scaled activities by ENSAP and NELSAP. Target for outcome 4 Target 4.1: All pertinent programs projects going in the countries into which the scaling up strategy embedded & identified in consultation with key stakeholders in each country. Target for Outcome 5 Outcome 5: Pilots lead to overall enhanced conservation and efficient use of water resources and promote water efficient land use activities, strengthening livelihoods status Indicator and baseline Target 5.1: All pertinent programs IWRM projects going on in the countries into which the scaling up strategy can be embedded identified in consultation with key stakeholders in each country. Component 4: Further strengthening capacity to address groundwater issues at the national and regional levels Outcome 6: Technicians, academics, and senior planners at national, sub-regional and regional levels capacitated on key requisite techniques on groundwater monitoring and sustainable management. Target 6.1: At least three (3) training conducted for the key stakeholders in each county (target 40 percent of beneficiaries of the trainings are women). Outcome 7: under component 4 Outcome 7: Regional and national decision makers have increased their understanding on importance of groundwater and capacitated to develop and adopt recommendations emerging from the analyses related to Groundwater governance and Conjunctive management facilitating policies Target 7.1: 50% (Half) of the planned and budged exchange programs conducted and completed (target 40 percent of beneficiaries of the exchange programs are women). Target 7.2: Half of the planned and budged training programs conducted and completed (target 40 percent of beneficiaries of the trainings are women) Component 5: Communication and awareness raising including Knowledge management M and E. Outcome 8: Knowledge Management and M&E Target 8.1: Initial project results and lessons learned shared through dedicated project website (all completed technical reports available online in print formats for distribution) 1. The governance structure and the PMU are in place after the Inception meeting of the project to kick start the process of recruiting the researchers. 2. 00 SADA reports shared in participating Countries. Project Objective:To enhance knowledge and capacity for sustainable use and management of transboundary aquifers and aquifers of regional significance in the Nile Basin Objective targets Target 1: Updated information on national policies/institutions to protect /conserve transboundary aquifers and associated ecosystems Target 2: 50% level of completion of 2nd GEF PIR 50% (note at least 50% of the beneficiary are women) Component 1: Enhance current understanding and the knowledge on the resources base, threats and options for sustainable management and utilization of shared aquifers. Outcome 1: Improved understanding and knowledge of groundwater and how it interacts with surface water and the types of pressures on them, building upon existing information Target for outcome 1 Target: Evaluation, harmonization and validation of all previous findings from local literature, published sources, and from international knowledge repositories (e.g. IGRAC, BGS, BGR, IGAD) compiled in a report format. Targets for Outcome indicator 1.2 Target 1: Identified and Quality checked Target 2: Design of geodata base for the selected aquifers Target 3: Data collection mechanism (training workshops) activated in the 7 countries. Target 4: Quality check of the collected data conducted and control procedures developed Target for Outcome Indicator 1.3: Target 1: Suitability of various models assessed Target 2: Data for model inputs compiled and completed Target 3: Isotope hydrology studies for conceptual model development conducted Component 2: Development of action plans on groundwater resources governance, management, and protection for inclusion in national, sub-basin and basin wide frameworks: also including consideration of surface water/groundwater resources conjunctive use. Targets under outcome 2 ( target for Indicators 2.1, 2.2 & 2.3) Target 2.1 a): Assessment review of -national policy environment and groundwater management approaches in each country pertaining to the aquifers. Target 2.1): One (1) stakeholders diagnostic is carried out in early stages of project (e.g. sex-disaggregated data collected) in order to e.g. identify stakeholder groups to involve in project (e.g. water users, farmers, private sector, women’s groups). Target.2.2: One (1) assessment/enumeration of all groundwater monitoring approaches (modern RS techniques, telemetric monitoring, customary practices etc) worldwide in Nile context conducted Target 2.3: Compilation and assessment of existing practices in MAR, Water quality protection, and conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater completed and prepared. Outcome 3: NBI’s subsidiary action programs (Eastern Nile and Nile Equatorial Lakes sub-basin) will be strengthened through integration of groundwater aspects for selected sub basins Indicators: Target 3.1: Sufficient evidence (technical, social, economic) to feed into to the technical guide gathered. Component 3: Targeted pilot projects to explore conjunctive use of surface and groundwaters, and links to biodiversity conservation and climate change adaptation. Outcome 4: Broad dissemination of the results from two pilot actions lead to scaled activities by ENSAP and NELSAP. Target for outcome 4 Target 4.1: All pertinent programs projects going in the countries into which the scaling up strategy embedded & identified in consultation with key stakeholders in each country. Target for Outcome 5 Outcome 5: Pilots lead to overall enhanced conservation and efficient use of water resources and promote water efficient land use activities, strengthening livelihoods status Indicator and baseline Target 5.1: All pertinent programs IWRM projects going on in the countries into which the scaling up strategy can be embedded identified in consultation with key stakeholders in each country. Component 4: Further strengthening capacity to address groundwater issues at the national and regional levels Outcome 6: Technicians, academics, and senior planners at national, sub-regional and regional levels capacitated on key requisite techniques on groundwater monitoring and sustainable management. Target 6.1: At least three (3) training conducted for the key stakeholders in each county (target 40 percent of beneficiaries of the trainings are women). Outcome 7: under component 4 Outcome 7: Regional and national decision makers have increased their understanding on importance of groundwater and capacitated to develop and adopt recommendations emerging from the analyses related to Groundwater governance and Conjunctive management facilitating policies Target 7.1: 50% (Half) of the planned and budged exchange programs conducted and completed (target 40 percent of beneficiaries of the exchange programs are women). Target 7.2: 50% (Half) of the planned and budged training programs conducted and completed (target 40 percent of beneficiaries of the trainings are women) Component 5: Communication and awareness raising including Knowledge management M and E. Outcome 8: Knowledge Management and M&E Target 8.1: Initial project results and lessons learned shared through dedicated project website (all completed technical reports available online in print formats for distribution) 1. The governance structure and the PMU are in place after the Inception meeting of the project to kick start the process of recruiting the researchers. 2. 00 SADA reports shared in participating Countries. Project Objective:To enhance knowledge and capacity for sustainable use and management of transboundary aquifers and aquifers of regional significance in the Nile Basin Objective targets Target 1: Draft New policies and institutional mechanism to manage the transboundary aquifer resources recommended Target 2: More that 50% expected level of completion at mid-term evaluation in 2022 Component 1: Enhance current understanding and the knowledge on the resources base, threats and options for sustainable management and utilization of shared aquifers. Outcome 1: Improved understanding and knowledge of groundwater and how it interacts with surface water and the types of pressures on them, building upon existing information Target for outcome 1 Target 1.1: One (1) out of three SADA reports completed for all aquifers Targets for Outcome indicator 1.2 Target 1: Harmonized and standardized geodata base produced or established for the three aquifers and database mirrors established in each participating country Target 2: At least One out of three aquifer/hydrogeology maps produced for the three aquifers at a specified scale Target for Outcome Indicator 1.3: Target 1.3: A near to functional SW-GW coupled model capable of simulating water availability under different socio economic and physical changes in place for the three aquifers Component 2: Development of action plans on groundwater resources governance, management, and protection for inclusion in national, sub-basin and basin wide frameworks: also including consideration of surface water/groundwater resources conjunctive use. Outcome 2: Increased convergence of national approaches, policies and governance mechanisms for protection and sustainable use of shared aquifers. Targets under outcome 2 ( target for Indicators 2.1, 2.2 & 2.3) Target 2.1: A Draft Action plan proposals conforming to gender responsive guiding principles developed through a participatory process with key stakeholders and submitted to member states and for inclusion in NBI’s subsidiary action programs Target 2.1: One (1) stakeholders diagnostic is carried out in early stages of project (e.g. sex-disaggregated data collected) in order to e.g. identify stakeholder groups to involve in project (e.g. water users, farmers, private sector, women’s groups). Target.2.2: A draft Groundwater monitoring action plan (to monitor water level changes, water quality changes, mapping abstraction changes) and monitoring design for the aquifer areas proposed. Target 2.3 a) Preparation of the technical guide to support conjunctive use of SW and GW underway with full consideration of gender issues. Target 2.3 b) One (1) Draft MAR guideline and manual. Target 2.3 c) One (1) draft Water Quality Protection manual/guideline. Outcome 3: NBI’s subsidiary action programs (Eastern Nile and Nile Equatorial Lakes sub-basin) will be strengthened through integration of groundwater aspects for selected sub basins Indicators: Target 3.1: A draft Technical guideline document prepared. Component 3: Targeted pilot projects to explore conjunctive use of surface and groundwaters, and links to biodiversity conservation and climate change adaptation. Outcome 4: Broad dissemination of the results from two pilot actions lead to scaled activities by ENSAP and NELSAP. Target for outcome 4 Target 4.1: One out of Four pilot studies implemented. Target for Outcome 5 Outcome 5: Pilots lead to overall enhanced conservation and efficient use of water resources and promote water efficient land use activities, strengthening livelihoods status Indicator and baseline Target 5.1: One draft strategy developed based on the pilots for mainstreaming the most successful pilots into operational IWRM activities at relevant levels Component 4: Further strengthening capacity to address groundwater issues at the national and regional levels Outcome 6: Technicians, academics, and senior planners at national, sub-regional and regional levels capacitated on key requisite techniques on groundwater monitoring and sustainable management. Target 6.1: Training provided on at least 4 topics out of 8 for stakeholders in each country Outcome 7: under component 4 Outcome 7: Regional and national decision makers have increased their understanding on importance of groundwater and capacitated to develop and adopt recommendations emerging from the analyses related to Groundwater governance and Conjunctive management facilitating policies Target 7.1: More that 50% (Half) of the planned and budged exchange programs conducted and completed (target 40 percent of beneficiaries of the exchange programs are women).The beneficiaries have started to apply the key lessons learned into their activities at various levels. Target 7.2: More than (50%) Half of the planned and budged training programs conducted and completed and the beneficiaries start to apply the key lessons learned into their activities at various levels Component 5: Communication and awareness raising including Knowledge management M and E. Outcome 8: Knowledge Management and M&E Target 8.1: Groundwater issues and conjunctive use management included in NBI communications and awareness raising activities; All project results and lessons learned compiled in at least to Experience Notes and shared through website, in leaflets, All completed technical reports available online. Target 8.2: Information leaflets and guidance available on groundwater issues prepared for different groups of stakeholders. Target 8.3: Five (5) communication and awareness raising products generated and disseminated to national stakeholders through NBI communication platforms (website, Facebook). Target 8.4: One (1) video Documentary prepared by NBI to raise awareness on role of groundwater – surface water conjunctive use in integrated water resources management in selected sub-basins Information leaflets and guidance on groundwater issues prepared for different groups of stakeholders. Target 8.5: Lessons and experiences on conjunctive use management and the inclusion of groundwater considerations inform IW (and other) projects globally. Component 1: Enhance current understanding and the knowledge on the resources base, threats and options for sustainable management and utilization of shared aquifers. Outcome 1: Improved understanding and knowledge of groundwater and how it interacts with surface water and the types of pressures on them, building upon existing information Results under Outcome 1 Result 1.1: Three Shared Aquifer Diagnostic Analysis (SADA) reports, have updated information on national policies/institutions to protect /conserve transboundary aquifers. Result 1.2. Three (3) SADA reports completed for 3 shared aquifers in 7 countries (Uganda, Burindi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Kenya, South Sudan, Sudan) Result 1.3: Three (3) Water balance model describing/coupling Surface Water (SW)-Ground Water (GW) interaction + three (3) suitability maps Component 2: Development of action plans on groundwater resources governance, management, and protection for inclusion in national, sub-basin and basin wide frameworks: also including consideration of surface water/groundwater resources conjunctive use. Outcome 2: Increased convergence of national approaches, policies and governance mechanisms for protection and sustainable use of shared aquifers. Results under outcome 2: Result 2.1 Regional Shared Aquifer Integrated Management Action Plan- The following progress has been made: • Consultants engaged • Relevant stakeholders engaged • Inception reports are prepared • preparations of action plans on going ending February 2023 Result 2.2 Updated information on groundwater monitor status in project shared aquifer areas Result 2.3a) Background material for preparation of guidelines included in the Shared Aquifer Diagnostic Analysis (SADA) and modeling reports • Technical reports of the project integrated in the management plans to provide knowledge for downstream technical work of the SAPS. Outcome 3: NBI’s subsidiary action programs (Eastern Nile and Nile Equatorial Lakes sub-basin) will be strengthened through integration of groundwater aspects for selected sub basins Indicators: Result: No result was attained this year under this outcome Component 3: Targeted pilot projects to explore conjunctive use of surface and groundwaters, and links to biodiversity conservation and climate change adaptation. Outcome 4: Broad dissemination of the results from two pilot actions lead to scaled activities by ENSAP and NELSAP. Results attained under Outcome 4 Result 4.1: Five (5) pilot projects illustrating appropriate Innovative techniques for sustainable conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water resources were presented by focal institutions that need thorough validation and consultation. - The development of background information and knowledge is being carried out as part of the ongoing assessment of aquifers. Component 4: Output 6 Component 4: Further strengthening capacity to address groundwater issues at the national and regional levels. Outcome 6: Technicians, academics, and senior planners at national, sub-regional and regional levels capacitated on key requisite techniques on groundwater monitoring and sustainable management. Results attained under output 6 Result 6.1: Two (2) Trainings were conducted: 1st training: AQUAVEO conducted virtual training on (GMS) groundwater modeling system where 16 male & 1 female participants 2nd (1) Regional training on data management & Modelling attended by 25 participants. Results under outcome 7: Outcome 7: Regional and national decision makers have increased their understanding on importance of groundwater and capacitated to develop and adopt recommendations emerging from the analyses related to Groundwater governance and Conjunctive management facilitating policies Result 7.1 Gender mainstreaming action plan prepared And aligned to NBI gender mainstreaming strategy-Two (2) Trainings were conducted; one in Suitability maps developing for groundwater potentials using remote data sensing and another training in ground data base using Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) geophysical investigations. Result 7.2: One (1) Regional training on Groundwater Modelling was conducted in attendance of 20 participants. Component 5: Output 8 Result 8.1: Several recommendations, lessons and strategies compiled in three (3) regional SADA reports & Fourteen (14) national reports. Reports uploaded on NBI online platforms. The reports have been formatted and published according to NBI procedures. Results attained under output 8 Result 8.2: Sixteen (16) Featured storied were developed on the Kagera & Mountain Elgon shared aquifer region reflecting on the value of groundwater in the region. Result 8.3: Eight (8) broadcasts were developed reflecting on the sustainable management of groundwater and relation to climate change. Result 8.4: Six (6) short documentaries made on Kagera & Mount Elgon -Three (3) aquifers fact sheets. -One paper presented for Uganda water week. -One paper presented for UNESCO Groundwater and SDG conference in Paris (Virtually). -One panel discussion in UN WATER SUMMIT Paris Dec,6 This indicator measures the number of countries with shared aquifers that have completed SADA (Shared Aquifer Diagnostic Assessment) reports The SADA report include geological and hydrogeological maps, new conceptual models, and new information on connection between surface waters and groundwaters within the Nile based Region covering 3 shared aquifers namely the Kagera transboundary aquifer, Mt Elgon Aquifer and Gedaref-Adigrat sandstone transboundary aquifer An aquifer is an underground layer of rock or sediment that contains water and releases it in appreciable amounts. This indicator measures the number of knowledgebases developed for the 3 shared aquifers namely the Kagera transboundary aquifer, Mt Elgon Aquifer and Gedaref-Adigrat sandstone transboundary aquifer The knowledgebase will comprise aquifer maps and geo-database of key aquifer attributes. The aquifer maps shall, at a minimum, include aquifer areal extents, water table elevation, key water recharge areas, key water demand centers they support (if any), and water quality status (using key parameters) with identified water quality hotspots. This indicator measures the number of water balance models developed and used for "This indicator measures the number of shared Aquifer Integrated Management Action Plan developed covering: a) Actions for improving groundwater monitoring using ground and remote sensing-based technologies. ie monitoring the status of the groundwater resource base (water levels, recharge, water quality) as well as its use (abstraction). b) Technical manuals and guides support conjunctive use groundwater and surface water resources. c) Recommended institutional mechanisms for sustainable management and utilization of the groundwater resource. Further, the recommendations will also cover aspects for strengthening national inter-sectoral coordination to promote protection and sustainable conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources. Gender aspects will be integrated in all recommendations with the aim improving roles of women and youth in groundwater resources management. d) Measures for maintenance of groundwater to sustain groundwater-dependent aquatic ecosystems (wetlands, floodplains and river reaches). e) Strategies for conjunctive surface and groundwater use as a key climate change adaption measure at national and regional levels. " This indicator measures the number of harmonized ground water action Plan developed covering: information on water depth, ground water flow and recharge and management systems. This indicator measures the number of technical manuals and guides designed to support conjunctive use groundwater and surface water resources. These technical manuals and guides will address, among others, measures for enhancing aquifer recharge (such as through MAR- Managed Aquifer Recharge) and sustainable yield, water quality protection, and conservation of groundwater dependent aquatic ecosystems linked to the selected aquifers. Technical guide on integration Groundwater aspects in NBI’ subsidiary action programs for the selected sub basins targeting key activities: watershed management, sub-basin integrated management plans, wetlands sustainable management activities The pilots shall include the following: a) Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) interventions: the MAR will be piloted in two sub-basins of the Nile. At least one pilot will be integrated with improving water supply for a small – medium sized town dependent on groundwater. Pilot Water Funds for sustainable watershed services to improve groundwater recharge and upstream downstream collaboration will be explored. c) Use of advanced remote sensing for monitoring and management of shared groundwater aquifers. d) Use of isotope hydrology technique for detailed modelling of interaction between ground and surface water for specific (selected) wetland ecosystems. Under this pilot, a detailed model for surface water – groundwater interaction will be developed and linked to the NB DSS. This indicator quantifies the number of strategy documents that have been successfully scaled up from their initial pilot project and integrated into the broader framework of national-level IWRM activities. It measures the extent to which strategies developed for specific pilot initiatives have influenced and become part of the national water resources management framework. "The indicator measures the number of trainings for technicians, academicians and senior planners conducted on ground water monitoring. The subjects of the trainings will include: - Gender mainstreaming in Groundwater Management; water and gender for the promotion of gender equality and women empowerment, the collection of gender disaggregated data using the UNESCO WWAP Toolkit - Groundwater assessment using ground based and remote sensing data sources - Hydrogeology and groundwater recharge estimation - Groundwater modelling - Aquifer mapping - Planning and Implementing Managed Aquifer Recharge - Groundwater governance - Conjunctive surface and groundwater management and protection" The indicator measures the number of structured and purposeful knowledge exchange activities implemented as part of a project. These activities are designed to facilitate the sharing of information, expertise, and experiences among different stakeholders on the importance of protecting groundwater. " The indicator measures the number of trainings for officials at different administrative levels conducted on ground water governance and management. Potential topics of the training include: Groundwater governance, Conjunctive surface, Groundwater management and Protection, water and gender for the promotion of gender equality and women empowerment, and on the collection of gender disaggregated data using the UNESCO WWAP Toolkit. Number of key project lessons and strategies documented, disseminated and adopted at local, national and regional levels XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00120545 United Nations Development Programme With more than 60 labs across the globe, the project seeks to tackle the complexity of development by introducing new protocols, backed by evidence and practice, testing and dissemination of solutions within and across countries. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-UN Uganda MPTF GOVERNMENT OF GERMANY UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Qatar Fund for Development GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00116726 United Nations Development Programme With 91 labs supporting 115 countries across the globe, the project seeks to tackle the complexity of development by introducing new protocols, backed by evidence and practice, testing and dissemination of solutions within and across countries. United Nations Development Programme WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN Qatar Fund for Development UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF GERMANY MPTF-UN Uganda MPTF registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 379143 589720 511797 389287 391127 138267 474888 29921 United Nations Development Programme 32749 United Nations Development Programme 30889 United Nations Development Programme 37917 United Nations Development Programme 29664 United Nations Development Programme 24025 United Nations Development Programme -6 United Nations Development Programme 34333 United Nations Development Programme 32140 United Nations Development Programme 44498 United Nations Development Programme 33740 United Nations Development Programme 66815 United Nations Development Programme 21382 United Nations Development Programme 31146 United Nations Development Programme 25161 United Nations Development Programme 23393 United Nations Development Programme 19961 United Nations Development Programme 31160 United Nations Development Programme 40826 United Nations Development Programme 30919 United Nations Development Programme 8604 United Nations Development Programme 27352 United Nations Development Programme 61795 United Nations Development Programme 24657 United Nations Development Programme 44332 United Nations Development Programme 20791 United Nations Development Programme 28318 United Nations Development Programme 163379 United Nations Development Programme 25990 United Nations Development Programme 37402 United Nations Development Programme 35626 United Nations Development Programme 2647 United Nations Development Programme 7836 United Nations Development Programme 4043 United Nations Development Programme 380 United Nations Development Programme 4744 United Nations Development Programme 404286 United Nations Development Programme 313535 United Nations Development Programme 209209 United Nations Development Programme 122343 United Nations Development Programme 64278 MPTF-UN Uganda MPTF United Nations Development Programme 2150358 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Output 1: 1.1 Number of new data sources used at Country Office level. 1.2 Diversity of different data sources used 1.3 Number of sustainable development solutions identified and documented 1.4 Variety of innovation methods used to test and iterate over the different hypotheses. Output 2: 2.1 Learning the Accelerator Lab Network shares with a public audience (outside of UNDP) 2.2 Number of lab insights, processes or products which are taken up by governments or other partners 2.3 Proportion of partners and governments that increase their take up of the innovation methods included in the Accelerator Lab Network suite 2.4 Proportion of UNDP Country Office programming influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network’s work and methodologies Output 3: 3.1 Size and density of the network effects among the Accelerator Labs 3.2 Number of new models, approaches, and insights documented and disseminated throughout the network. 3.3 Engagement of the broader Development ecosystem with published learnings from the Accelerator Lab Network. 3.4 Amount of influence the learnings and methods of the Accelerator Lab Network have on the discourse of the broader Development ecosystem. Output 1: 0 (2018) new data sources used at Country Office Level 0 (2018)diversity of different data sources used 0 (2018) sustainable development solutions identified and documented 0 (2018) variety of innovation methods used to test and iterate over the different hypotheses. Output 2: 0 (2018) Learning the Accelerator Lab Network shares with a public audience (outside of UNDP) 0 (2018) lab insights, processes or products which are taken up by governments or other partners 0 (2018) proportion of partners and governments that increase their take up of the innovation methods included in the Accelerator Lab Network suite 0 (2018) Proportion of UNDP Country Office programming influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network’s work and methodologies Output 3: 0 (2018) Size and density of the network effects among the Accelerator Labs 0 (2018) new models, approaches, and insights documented and disseminated throughout the network. 0 (2018) engagement of the broader Development ecosystem with published learnings from the Accelerator Lab Network. 0 (2018) 3.4 Amount of influence the learnings and methods of the Accelerator Lab Network have on the discourse of the broader Development ecosystem. Output 1: Target 1.1: Four (4) new data sources used at Country Office level. Target 1.2 Four (4) Diversity of different data sources used Target 1.3: Thirty five (35) sustainable development solutions identified and documented Target 1.4: Two (2) Varieties of innovation methods used to test and iterate over the different hypotheses. Output 2: Target 2.1: Twelve (12) blogs, two (2) videos, or other (substantial) media posts as learnings the Accelerator Lab Network shares with a public audience (outside of UNDP). Target 2.2: Two (2) lab insights, process or product which are taken up by government or other partners. Target 2.3: 2% of partners and governments that increase their take up of the innovation methods included in the Accelerator Lab Network suite Target 2.4: 2% Proportion of UNDP Country Office programming influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network’s work and methodologies Output 3: Target 3.1: Each lab should interact at least once a week with another lab, a partner, and the global team as a way of tracking the size and density of the network effects among the Accelerator Labs. Target 3.2: 5% of information shared on different platforms shows the new models, approaches, and insights documented and disseminated throughout the network. Target 3.3: 5% monthly increase in engagement on Twitter. 5% monthly increase in Twitter and LinkedIn followers. 200+ impressions on Twitter. 200 views per month for blogs as tracking the engagement of the broader Development ecosystem with published learnings from the Accelerator Lab Network. Target 3.4: 5% of the conversation will be influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network to track the amount of influence the learnings and methods of the Accelerator Lab Network have on the discourse of the broader Development ecosystem. Output 1: 4new data sources were used at Country Office level. Crowdsourcing and citizens data 4Diversity of different data sources were used 106 Number of sustainable development solutions were identified and documented 2 Varieties of innovation methods were used to test and iterate over the different hypotheses. Output 2: 12 blogs, 2 videos, and 25 other (substantial) media posts as learnings the Accelerator Lab Network shares with a public audience (outside of UNDP) 2 lab insights, process or product was taken up by governments National Forests Authority to tackle the issue of deforestation. 1% of partners and governments National Forests Authority increased their take up of the innovation methods included in the Accelerator Lab Network suite 1% Proportion of UNDP Country Office programming (Climate Change Programme) was influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network’s work and methodologies Output 3: Each lab member interacted more than once a week with another lab, a partner, and the global team tracking the size and density of the network effects among the Accelerator Labs using the different platforms like WhatsApp, Zoom weekly global call, meetings with different partners e.t.c 5%of information shared on different platforms showed new models, approaches, and insights documented and disseminated throughout the network. 5% monthly increase in engagement on Twitter. 5% monthly increase in Twitter and LinkedIn followers. 2000+ impressions on Twitter. 200 views per month for blogs were recorded as tracking the engagement of the broader Development ecosystem with published learnings from the Accelerator Lab Network. 1% of the conversation was influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network to track the amount of influence the learnings and methods of the Accelerator Lab Network have on the discourse of the broader Development ecosystem. Output 1: 4 new data sources used at Country Office level. 4 Diversity of different data sources used 35 Number of sustainable development solutions identified and documented 2 Varieties of innovation methods used to test and iterate over the different hypotheses. Output 2: 12 blogs, 2videos, or other (substantial) media posts as learnings the Accelerator Lab Network shares with a public audience (outside of UNDP) 2 lab insights, process or product which are taken up by government or other partners. 2% of partners and governments that increase their take up of the innovation methods included in the Accelerator Lab Network suite 2% Proportion of UNDP Country Office programming influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network’s work and methodologies Output 3: Each lab should interact at least once a week with another lab, a partner, and the global team as a way of tracking the size and density of the network effects among the Accelerator Labs 5% of information shared on different platforms shows the new models, approaches, and insights documented and disseminated throughout the network. 5% monthly increase in engagement on Twitter. 5% monthly increase in Twitter and LinkedIn followers. 200+ impressions on Twitter. 200 views per month for blogs as tracking the engagement of the broader Development ecosystem with published learnings from the Accelerator Lab Network. 5% of the conversation will be influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network to track the amount of influence the learnings and methods of the Accelerator Lab Network have on the discourse of the broader Development ecosystem. Results attained under Output 1 and its targets: --5new data sources were used at Country Office level. Crowdsourcing, citizens data, Ethnography, Collective Intelligence and GIS - 5Diversity of different data sources were used. Crowdsourcing, citizens data, Ethnography, Collective Intelligence and GIS - 152 Number of sustainable development solutions were identified and documented - 3 Varieties of innovation methods were used to test and iterate over the different hypotheses. E-commerce platform to connect informal market vendors online, Transforming Mulago Hospital Kitchen from using biomass to electricity as an experiment to test the affordability and efficiency of electricity as an alternative cooking solution to biomass in a bid curb deforestation and lastly Youth Ideathon to empower and train youth with viable entrepreneurial ideas to tackle youth unemployment. Results attained under Output 2 and its targets: -12 blogs, 2 videos, and 25 other (substantial) media posts as learnings the Accelerator Lab Network shares with a public audience (outside of UNDP) -2 lab insights, process or products were taken up by government entities. One is the Natural Resource Information System (NARIS) was taken up for scaling by National Forests Authority (NFA) and National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) for natural resource governance. The second is the the use of Electricity as an alternative solution for cooking was taken up by Mulago National Referral Hospital. This led to policy change where the Electricity Regulatory Authority (ERA) reduced the electricity tariff rate from UGX 556 per Kwh to UGX 451.4per Kwh for large institutions in Uganda. - 10% of partners and government increased their take up of the innovation methods included in the Accelerator Lab Network suite. NARIS was taken up for scaling by government bodies like the National Forestry Authority (NFA), National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) with support from the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) through the UNDP Anti-Corruption for Peaceful and Inclusive Societies (ACPIS) Global Programme. - 50% Proportion of UNDP Country Office programming (5 flagship programmes) was influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network’s work and methodologies. This was mainly through the supporting of the Country Programme Document (CPD) Results attained under Output 3 and its targets: - Each lab member interacted more than once a week with another lab, a partner, and the global team tracking the size and density of the network effects among the Accelerator Labs using the different platforms like WhatsApp, Zoom weekly global call, meetings with different partners e.t.c - 10%of information shared on different platforms showed new models, approaches, and insights documented and disseminated throughout the network. -5% monthly increase in engagement on Twitter. 5% monthly increase in Twitter and LinkedIn followers. 2000+ impressions on Twitter. 200 views per month for blogs were recorded as tracking the engagement of the broader Development ecosystem with published learnings from the Accelerator Lab Network. - 7% of the conversation was influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network to track the amount of influence the learnings and methods of the Accelerator Lab Network have on the discourse of the broader Development ecosystem. Output 1: Target 1.1: Four (4) new data sources used at Country Office level. Target 1.2: Four (4) Diversity of different data sources used Target 1.3: Thirty five (35) sustainable development solutions identified and documented Target 1.4: Two (2) Varieties of innovation methods used to test and iterate over the different hypotheses. Output 2: Target 2.1: Twelve (12) blogs, two (2) videos, or other (substantial) media posts as leanings the Accelerator Lab Network shares with a public audience (outside of UNDP) Target 2.2: Two (2) lab insights, process or product, which are taken up by government or other partners. -Target 2.3: 2% of partners and governments that increase their take up of the innovation methods included in the Accelerator Lab Network suite Target 2.4: 2% Proportion of UNDP Country Office programming influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network’s work and methodologies. Output 3: Target 3.1: Each lab should interact at least once a week with another lab, a partner, and the global team as a way of tracking the size and density of the network effects among the Accelerator Labs Target 3.2: 5% of information shared on different platforms shows the new models, approaches, and insights documented and disseminated throughout the network. Target 3.3: 5% monthly increase in engagement on Twitter. 5% monthly increase in Twitter and LinkedIn followers. 200+ impressions on Twitter. 200 views per month for blogs as tracking the engagement of the broader Development ecosystem with published learnings from the Accelerator Lab Network. Target 3.4: 5% of the conversation will be influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network to track the amount of influence the leanings and methods of the Accelerator Lab Network have on the discourse of the broader Development ecosystem. Results attained under Output 1 and its targets: - Five (5) new data sources were used at Country Office level. Crowdsourcing, citizens data, Ethnography, Collective Intelligence and GIS -Five (5) Diversity of different data sources were used. Crowdsourcing, citizens data, Ethnography, Collective Intelligence and GIS - Fifty eight (58) sustainable development solutions were identified and documented - Three (3) varieties of innovation methods were used to test and iterate over the different hypotheses Codesigned with Ministry of Trade designed platforms that are not only facilitating export trade, but also support market intelligence to facilitate B2B exchanges as well as connections between Ugandan MSMEs and counterparts in other countries. A beta version of this platform can be accessed on this link https://undp-b2b.doctracker.co/, Scaled and handed over the Mulago Hospital Kitchen which was transformed from using biomass to electricity as an experiment to test the affordability and efficiency of electricity as an alternative cooking solution to biomass. This has so far fed and improved the nutrition of over 900 babies and their mothers from Jan-Nov 2022. And utilized the Accelerator Lab approach to deliver the Digitalization, Innovation and Smart Cities Programme. The programme delivery was 100% by December 2022. Results attained under Output 2 and its targets: - Eight (8) blogs, two (2) videos, and twenty five (25) other (substantial) media posts as learnings to the Accelerator Lab Network shares with a public audience (outside of UNDP) - Two (2) lab insights, process or products were taken up by government entities. One is the handover of the converted Mulago Hospital Kitchen from biomass to electricity. This led to policy change where the Electricity Regulatory Authority (ERA) reduced the electricity tariff rate from UGX 556 per Kwh to UGX 451.4per Kwh for large institutions in Uganda. The Second one is the MSME B2B online market intelligence platform, which connects traders online and be able to export. This we are codesigning it with Ministry of Trade, Cooperatives and Industry. - 15% of partners and government increased their take up of the innovation methods included in the Accelerator Lab Network suite. The designing of the several policies building on the work that we initially did. Like the E-Commerce Policy, we are working with Ministry of Trade, Industry and Cooperatives, working with Ministry of ICT and National Guidance to codesign the National Long-term Digital Transformation Roadmap with aspects of developing Big Data utilization strategy. Working with ministry of trade to map start-ups and designing a Startup policy. - 45% Proportion of UNDP Country Office programming was influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network’s work and methodologies. This was mainly through the supporting the implementation of the Digitalization Innovation and Smart Cities (DISC) Programme and handing over a successful experiment to the Nature, Climate, and Energy Resilience (NCER) Team. Acc Lab handed over the Natural Resources Information System (NARIS), which is going to be scaled to also add wetlands, yet it was initially designed to monitor forests in a bid to provide data on the forest cover in Uganda. Results attained under Output 3 and its targets: • Each lab member interacted more than once a week with another lab, a partner, and the global team tracking the size and density of the network effects among the Accelerator Labs using the different platforms like WhatsApp, Zoom weekly global call, meetings with different partner’s e.t.c. • 10% of information shared on different platforms showed new models, approaches, and insights documented and disseminated throughout the network. • 5% monthly increase in Twitter and LinkedIn followers was recorded. 2000+ impressions on Twitter. 200 views per month for blogs were recorded as tracking the engagement of the broader Development ecosystem with published learnings from the Accelerator Lab Network. • 7% of the conversation was influenced by the Accelerator Lab Network to track the amount of influence, learnings and methods that the Accelerator Lab Network had on the discourse of the broader Development ecosystem The diversity of different data sources used in a learning cycle Proportion of partners and government that increase their take up of the innovation methods included in the Accelerator Lab Network suite XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00126722 United Nations Development Programme Strengthening Electoral Processes in Uganda: Transparency, Inclusion, capacity building and peace mechanisms Support United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF ICELAND NOR - MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK GOVERNMENT OF SWEDEN Austrian Development Agency UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00120695 United Nations Development Programme The ‘Strengthening Electoral Processes in Uganda’ (SEPU) project is an initiative of UNDP, UN Women,OHCHR and UNESCO. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Austrian Development Agency GOVERNMENT OF SWEDEN GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK NOR - MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF ICELAND registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Leaving no one behind 0 383729 4028255 2434801 727361 1964011 25752 United Nations Development Programme -25752 United Nations Development Programme 5289 United Nations Development Programme 62357 United Nations Development Programme 3157 United Nations Development Programme 32392 United Nations Development Programme -698 United Nations Development Programme 189563 United Nations Development Programme 96595 United Nations Development Programme 5085 United Nations Development Programme 7568 United Nations Development Programme 70154 United Nations Development Programme 164985 United Nations Development Programme 404814 United Nations Development Programme 35382 United Nations Development Programme 811918 United Nations Development Programme 405133 United Nations Development Programme 450154 United Nations Development Programme 28608 United Nations Development Programme 373997 United Nations Development Programme 90091 United Nations Development Programme 9251 United Nations Development Programme 115472 United Nations Development Programme 55279 United Nations Development Programme 33822 United Nations Development Programme 19146 United Nations Development Programme 258376 United Nations Development Programme 1111888 United Nations Development Programme 773194 United Nations Development Programme 1607119 United Nations Development Programme -123968 NOR - MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS United Nations Development Programme -27412 NOR - MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS United Nations Development Programme -40076 Austrian Development Agency United Nations Development Programme 1043171 GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK United Nations Development Programme 200000 GOVERNMENT OF ICELAND United Nations Development Programme 1122334 GOVERNMENT OF SWEDEN United Nations Development Programme 2822376 NOR - MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS United Nations Development Programme 1807831 Austrian Development Agency United Nations Development Programme 7224626 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) By end 2020, rule of law, separation of powers and constitutional democracy are entrenched in Uganda and all individuals are treated equally under the law and have equitable access to justice. Indicator 1.3.3: By 2020, targeted public institutions and CSOs have enhanced capacities to effectively include women and youth in peace building, democratic processes, sustainable production, energy and Natural Resource Management (NRM) by 2020. Output 1: Strengthened inclusion and transparency of the electoral process. Indicator 1.1: 15,277,198 total registered voters; 52% female (Proportion of eligible voters who are registered to vote, disaggregated by sex, age, and excluded groups). Indicator 1.2: In the 2016 elections 5.5% of candidates in the direct elections for President, Member of Parliament and District or City chairperson were women who ventured to compete directly against men.) Percentage of women (to men) participating as candidates in elections at national and subnational levels: Output 2: Enhanced institutional capacity for EC and other electoral stakeholders. Indicator 2.1: 42% Ugandans said they trust the Electoral Commission “somewhat” or “a lot” (2017 Afro barometer) (Public confidence in the EC %) Indicators 2.2: No of target institutions (EC, judiciary, human rights commission, police & media) with capacity to effectively support electoral processes; Indicator 2.3: No. of training programmes undertaken to support institutional strengthening across project beneficiaries; EC, media, judiciary & police. Output 3: Strengthened dialogue capacities and electoral violence early warning and rapid response system (EWER) Indicator 3.1: Existence of Early Warning & Rapid Response (EWER) systems at national and district levels. Indicator 3.2: Extent to which existing EWER infrastructure is gender responsive (e.g. include the collection of disaggregated data, gender analysis and targeted actions) developed; indicator 3.3: Number of dialogues held for mediation By end 2020, rule of law, separation of powers and constitutional democracy are entrenched in Uganda and all individuals are treated equally under the law and have equitable access to justice. Indicator 1.3.3: By 2020, targeted public institutions and CSOs have enhanced capacities to effectively include women and youth in peace building, democratic processes, sustainable production, energy and Natural Resource Management (NRM) by 2020. Output 1: Strengthened inclusion and transparency of the electoral process. Indicator 1.1: 15,277,198 total registered voters; 52% female (Proportion of eligible voters who are registered to vote, disaggregated by sex, age, and excluded groups). Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2016 Indicator 1.2: In the 2016 elections 5.5% of candidates in the direct elections for President, Member of Parliament and District or City chairperson were women who ventured to compete directly against men.) Percentage of women (to men) participating as candidates in elections at national and subnational levels: Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2016 Output 2: Enhanced institutional capacity for EC and other electoral stakeholders. Indicator 2.1: 42% Ugandans said they trust the Electoral Commission “somewhat” or “a lot” (2017 Afro barometer) (Public confidence in the EC %) Baseline: Zero (0) Year (2020) Indicators 2.2: No of target institutions (EC, judiciary, human rights commission, police & media) with capacity to effectively support electoral processes; Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2020 Indicator 2.3: No. of training programmes undertaken to support institutional strengthening across project beneficiaries; EC, media, judiciary & police. Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2020 Output 3: Strengthened dialogue capacities and electoral violence early warning and rapid response system (EWER) Indicator 3.1: Existence of Early Warning & Rapid Response (EWER) systems at national and district levels. Baseline: Not in place Year: 2020 Indicator 3.2: Extent to which existing EWER infras Output 1: Strengthened inclusion and transparency of the electoral process. Target for indicator 1.1: 10% increase in voter registration especially women, youth and PWD. Target for indicator 1.2: 7.5% increase in female candidates in all direct elective positions. Output 2: Enhanced institutional capacity for EC and other electoral stakeholders. Target for Indicator 2.1: 10% Increase in public trust in the EC (i.e. to 52%) Target for indicator 2.2: Three (3) institutions (EC, judiciary, human rights commission, police & media) with capacity to effectively support electoral processes; Target for indicator 2.3: A) One (1) ToT (national); B) Five ( 5) operational ToT at (subnational); B) Eleven (11) ToT (Subregional); C) One BRIDGE TtF modular trainings; C) Trainings of Police,Judic.& Media. Output 3: Strengthened dialogue capacities and electoral violence early warning and rapid response system (EWER) Target for indicator 3.1: EWER systems at national and district levels in place Target for indicator 3.2: Two (2 EWER systems partially include gender-data; Target for Indicator 3.3: Three (3) dialogues held for mediation and consensus building. Output 4: Effective and efficient management, partnership formation and monitoring and evaluation of the project Target for indicator 4.1: Eight (8) Project staff recruited on schedule; Target for Indicator 4.2: Four (4) Partnerships in place to support the electoral process; Target for Indicator 4.3: One (1) Project Mid-term Evaluation undertaken; Target for Indicator 4.4: 75% Annual Resource Delivery. Output 1: Strengthened inclusion and transparency of the electoral process. 1.1: 15.6% increase in voter registration especially women, youth and PWD. There are 18,103,603 voters (9,501,809 female, 8,601,794 male), and 65% youth. 1.2: 1.6% decline in the number of female candidates in all direct elective positions. It reduced from 6.5% in 2016 to 4.9% in 2021. Output 2: Enhanced institutional capacity for EC and other electoral stakeholders. 2.1: 5% Increase in public trust in the EC. This increased from 42% in 2016 to 47% in 2021. 2.2: 3 institutions (the Electoral Commission, Uganda Human Rights Commission, and the Media Center of Uganda) have capacity to effectively support electoral processes in Uganda. 2.3: 1. A) No (0) operational ToT training (national) for EC was conducted B) No (0) operational ToT at (subnational) for EC was conducted C) One BRIDGE modular training was conducted and 3 SEPU staff participated in the 5 day virtual training. The BRIDGE training for the Electoral Commission was not conducted. 2. None (0) Training of Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs in electoral law/regulation drafting was conducted. 3) None (0) Operational trainings of Police, Judiciary & Media was conducted Output 3: Strengthened dialogue capacities and electoral violence early warning and rapid response system (EWER) 3.1: There is an EWER systems at national and district level in place. It covers Central, Eastern, Western and Northern regions of Uganda. 3.2: 2 EWER systems partially include gender-data. The Early Warning and Early Response system is gender responsive and includes gender data. 3.3: 5 dialogue meetings were conducted in Central, Eastern, Northern, Western and Southern on mediation and consensus building. Output 4: Effective and efficient management, partnership formation and monitoring and evaluation of the project 4.1: 8 Project staff were recruited on schedule. 4.2: 4 Partnerships in place with key national actors like the Electoral Commission (EC), Judiciary, Media Council of Uganda (MCU), Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC), Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, The Elders Forum of Uganda (TEFU) and Inter Religious Council of Uganda (IRCU) to support the electoral process. 4.3: 1 Project Mid-term Evaluation was not undertaken. It will be conducted in 2021. 4.4: 35% Annual Resource Delivery. It is important to note that Project invalidation in September 2020, by the Government made it difficult to implement some of the planned activities like institutional strengthening, including much of the critical work especially with the Electoral Commission. Output 1: Strengthened inclusion and transparency of the electoral process. Target for indicator 1.1: 10% increase in voter registration especially women, youth and PWD. Target for indicator 1.2: 7.5% increase in female candidates in all direct elective positions. Output 2: Enhanced institutional capacity for EC and other electoral stakeholders. Target for Indicator 2.1: 10% Increase in public trust in the EC (i.e. to 52%) Target for Indicator 2.2: 5 institutions (EC, judiciary, human rights commission, police & media) with capacity to effectively support electoral processes; Target for indicator 2.3: A) Eleven (11) operational trainings at subnational level&; B) Ten (10) BRIDGE modular trainings. Output 3: Strengthened dialogue capacities and electoral violence early warning and rapid response system (EWER) Target for Indicator 3.1: EWER systems at national and district levels in place. Target for indicator 3.2: Three (3) EWER systems fully include gender-da Target for Indicator 3.3: Eight (8) dialogues held for mediation and consensus building Output 4: Effective and efficient management, partnership formation and monitoring and evaluation of the project Target for indicator 4.1: 10 Project staff recruited on schedule; Target for indicator 4.2: 8 Partnerships in place to support the electoral process; Target for indicator 4.3: Zero Project Mid-term Evaluation undertaken; Target for indicator 4.4: 100% Annual Resource Delivery. Output 1: Strengthened inclusion and transparency of the electoral process. 1.1: 15.6% increase in voter registration especially women, youth and PWD. There were 18,103,603 voters (9,501,809 female, 8,601,794 male), and 65% youth up from 15,277,198 in 2016. 1.2: 1.6% decline in the number of female candidates in all direct elective positions. It reduced from 6.5% in 2016 to 4.9% in 2021. Output 2: Enhanced institutional capacity for EC and other electoral stakeholders. 2.1: 5% Increase in public trust in the EC. This increased from 42% in 2016 to 47% in 2021. 2.2: 3 institutions (the Electoral Commission, Uganda Human Rights Commission, and the Media Center of Uganda) have capacity to effectively support electoral processes in Uganda. 2.3: A) No (0) operational ToT training (national) for EC was conducted B) No (0) operational ToT at (subnational) for EC was conducted 2. None (0) Training of Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs in electoral law/regulation drafting was conducted. 3) None (0) Operational trainings of Police, Judiciary & Media was conducted Output 3: Strengthened dialogue capacities and electoral violence early warning and rapid response system (EWER) 3.1: There is an EWER systems at national and district level in place. It covers Central, Eastern, Western and Northern regions of Uganda. 3.2: 2 EWER systems partially include gender-data. The Early Warning and Early Response system is gender responsive and includes gender data. 3.3: 5 dialogue meetings were conducted in Central, Eastern, Northern, Western and Southern on mediation and consensus building. Output 4: Effective and efficient management, partnership formation and monitoring and evaluation of the project 4.1: No staff was recruited in 2021 4.2: Partnerships was in place with The Elders Forum of Uganda (TEFU) and Inter Religious Council of Uganda (IRCU) to support the electoral and post electoral process. 4.3: 1 Project Mid-term Evaluation was not undertaken. 4.4: 35% Annual Resource Delivery. It is important to note that Project invalidation in September 2020, by the Government made it difficult to implement some of the planned activities like institutional strengthening, including much of the critical work especially with the Electoral Commission. Output 1: Strengthened inclusion and transparency of the electoral process. Target for indicator 1.1: 10% increase in voter registration especially women, youth and PWD. Target for indicator 1.2: 7.5% increase in female candidates in all direct elective positions. Output 2: Enhanced institutional capacity for EC and other electoral stakeholders. Target for Indicator 2.1: 10% Increase in public trust in the EC from 10% to 52% Target for Indicator 2.2: Five (5) institutions (EC, judiciary, human rights commission, police & media) with capacity to effectively support electoral processes; Target for indicator 2.3: A) Eleven (11) operational trainings at sub- national level&; B) Ten (10) BRIDGE modular trainings. Output 3: Strengthened dialogue capacities and electoral violence early warning and rapid response system (EWER) Target for Indicator 3.1: EWER systems at national and district levels in place. Target for indicator 3.2: Three (3) EWER systems fully include gender-data Target for Indicator 3.3: Eight (8) dialogues held for mediation and consensus building Output 4: Effective and efficient management, partnership formation and monitoring and evaluation of the project Target for indicator 4.1: Ten (10) Project staff recruited on schedule; Target for indicator 4.2: Eight (8) Partnerships in place to support the electoral process; Target for indicator 4.3: Zero Project Mid-term Evaluation undertaken; Target for indicator 4.4: 100% Annual Resource Delivery. Output 1: Strengthened inclusion and transparency of the electoral process. Results attained under output 1: 1) Stakeholder engagement, dialogues and mobilization of women voters was undertaken through regional Stakeholder workshops with Electoral Commission and CSOs, FBOs, Media, Political Parties, observers, SIGs, MDAs LGs, Political party women leagues, development partners, state and non-state actors. 2) Electoral Commission focused on supporting the preparation, development, popularization and display of the voter register for the Women Council elections. 3) Electoral Commission also raised awareness about registration for the Women Council elections via media outlets such as radio and press statements. Output 2: Enhanced institutional capacity for the Electoral Commission and other electoral stakeholders Results attained under output 2: 1) Initiated key activities with the Judiciary including: i) Installation and set-up of Video conferencing installation for Mubende High Court and Kaweeri Prison; ii) Development of training and learning tools on electoral dispute resolution; iii) Development of a Curriculum for training Court transcribers; iv) Training of Judicial Officers; v) South to South exchange and learning visit to Ghana; vi) Documentation and knowledge management; 2) OHCHR supported UHRC to conduct a high-level training for UPDF command officers on human rights standards in the context of UPDF operations to provide security during the Women Councils and committees elections 2022; 3) OHCHR supported UHRC to conduct a high-level training for CMI operational officers on human rights standards in the context of security operations to provide security during the Women Councils and committees elections 2022; and 4) Training of UPF on maintaining law and order and Production of Civic/Voter Education materials, including spot messages. 5) Women International Peace Centre conducted an end of project evaluation for the Women Situation Room (WSR) to establish the extent to which the project has achieved its objectives: Key findings include -The WSR project interventions are still relevant since the benefits are enormous. These include capacity building of women and youth, reduction of violence and peace building, support towards household incomes enhancement, among others. -The project managed to achieve its objectives towards providing women and youth with a platform to make a contribution towards curbing election violence and promoting peace among their communities. -The project interventions were delivered in time and thus it managed to achieve the objectives, while resources were also optimally deployed. -Project initiatives generally led to promotion of peace within the intervention communities. -Through focusing on building capacity of women and youth, project initiatives are easily sustained especially towards eradication of violence and peace building. -Project intervention made a great contribution towards the achievement of objectives of the NDP III programs. -The report is still in draft and will be reviewed by the Eminent Women who will provide feedback for the consultant to finalize. 6) UNDP in partnership with the UN family and Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC) provided support to the dialogue in commemoration of the International Day of Peace. Output 3: Effective and Efficient Management, Partnership Formation, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation of the Women Councils/Committees Elections Results attained under output 3: Engagement across project stakeholders and developments 1) Strategic engagements were held to inform the direction of the SEPU project. Key among these included with 2) Government leadership (Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, Prime Minister and Electoral Commission), Donor and UN Agencies meetings and the EC Strategic plan meeting. Consequently, further technical level engagements have been undertaken with the Electoral Commission and other relevant stakeholders where the workplan was finalized and implementation of the work plan was activated. 3) Key analysis was undertaken by two consultants including a political economy analysis in Uganda by Dr Frederick Golooba and an analysis of the Governance, peace and development emerging issues in Uganda by Prof. Christopher Mbazira. "This indicator quantifies the percentage of individuals who are eligible to vote and have successfully registered to vote in a particular election or within a defined timeframe. This indicator provides insight into the level of voter participation. The formula to calculate this indicator is as follows: Proportion of Eligible Voters Registered to Vote= (Number of Registered Voters/ Number of Eligible Voters) ×100% In this formula: • Number of Registered Voters: This represents the count of individuals who have completed the voter registration process and are thus eligible to participate in elections. • Number of Eligible Voters: This refers to the total number of individuals who meet the eligibility criteria for voting in a specific election or jurisdiction. Eligibility criteria typically include factors such as citizenship, age, and residency. This indicator quantifies gender balance among candidates running for political office in elections conducted at both the national and sub-national (regional or local) levels. It assess the level of gender diversity and women's representation in the political process. The formula to calculate this indicator is as follows: Percentage of Women Candidates (to Men Candidates)=(Number of Women Candidates/Total number Candidates)×100% In this formula: • Number of Women Candidates: This represents the count of women who have declared their candidacy to run for political office in a specific election, whether it's at the national or sub-national level. • Total number of Candidates: This refers to the count of all candidates who have declared their candidacy for the same election or political positions. This indicator assess the level of trust and faith that the general public has in the Body responsible for overseeing and conducting elections within a country/Election Commission (EC). This indicator is essential for evaluating the credibility and legitimacy of the electoral process. It takes into consideration the aspect of citizens’ perceptions of election quality and how well they think the national election management body does its job of ensuring transparent and competent elections. This indicator assess the effectiveness of specific institutions ie( EC, judiciary, human rights commission, police & media) in providing support for electoral processes within a country. This indicator focuses on the capacity of key institutions involved in elections to fulfill their roles and responsibilities in a competent and reliable manner. This indicator measures the number of training programmes that are to be undertaken to strengthen capacity of the electoral commission and other stakeholders on electoral processes. These trainings include, 1)Operational training for EC; a)One ToT (national) and b) 11 ToT (Sub-regional); c) One BRIDGE TtF&d) 10 BRIDGE modular trainings; 2) Training of Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs in electoral law/regulation drafting; 3) Operational trainings for the Police, Judiciary and Media. This indicator measures the number of core professionals recruited to implement the project deliverables during the life time of the programme. This indicator measures the project's performance against the set budget of USD . $ 7,233,981 XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00135378 United Nations Development Programme Trading Beyond EAC and COMESA; Unlocking Ugandas Potential in the AfCFTA. The project is intended to support the efforts to harness the enormous potential that the AfCFTA agreement presents for Uganda. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00126622 United Nations Development Programme Trading Beyond EAC and COMESA; Unlocking Ugandas Potential in the AfCFTA. The project is intended to support the efforts to harness the enormous potential that the AfCFTA agreement presents for Uganda. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 220039 516264 615888 712097 291216 26166 United Nations Development Programme 346 United Nations Development Programme 14680 United Nations Development Programme 20218 United Nations Development Programme 50653 United Nations Development Programme 12521 United Nations Development Programme 680 United Nations Development Programme 604 United Nations Development Programme 13141 United Nations Development Programme 10071 United Nations Development Programme 10477 United Nations Development Programme 26007 United Nations Development Programme 29 United Nations Development Programme 36386 United Nations Development Programme 39 United Nations Development Programme 50961 United Nations Development Programme 1025 United Nations Development Programme 3073 United Nations Development Programme 109983 United Nations Development Programme 5853 United Nations Development Programme 222308 United Nations Development Programme 21023 United Nations Development Programme 223222 United Nations Development Programme 25243 United Nations Development Programme 36260 United Nations Development Programme 70547 United Nations Development Programme 26505 United Nations Development Programme 36247 United Nations Development Programme 4834 United Nations Development Programme 9949 United Nations Development Programme 66107 United Nations Development Programme 12285 United Nations Development Programme -11103 United Nations Development Programme 7670 United Nations Development Programme 603659 United Nations Development Programme 286718 United Nations Development Programme 2094865 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) Output 1.1: Enhanced TRADE4SMEs financing for de-risking and incentivizing private sector investments. Output Indicator 1.1: A functional TRADE4SMEs Financing Facility in Place. Output 2.1: Youth, especially young women, have increased knowledge and entrepreneurship skills, employment and financial support to benefit from sustainable trade practices and opportunities. Indicator 2.1: Number of beneficiaries especially women and youth) of the initiative disaggregated by sex. Indicator 2.2: No. of integrated green development assessments (Diagnostics) conducted to inform policy option. Output 3: Increased product and market value chains especially for green exports, exports competitiveness and exports diversification. Indicator 3.1: No. of target value chains supported Indicator 3.2: No. of innovative financial instruments supporting new market opportunities for women and youth in target sectors. Indicator 3.3: No. of Public Private Partnerships in trade and related areas engaged. Output 4: Improved digitalization of trade in targeted sectors. Indicator 4.1: New online platform for trade digitalization and information in place Indicator 4.2: No. of target value chains supported with innovative digital payment and e-commerce platforms. Output 5: Project monitoring and evaluation Indicator 5.1: No. of M& E reports in place (Disaggregated by, progress reports, monitoring reports, evaluation reports. Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) Output 1.1: Enhanced TRADE4SMEs financing for de-risking and incentivizing private sector investments. Output Indicator 1.1: A functional TRADE4SMEs Financing Facility in Place. Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2020 Output 2.1: Youth, especially young women, have increased knowledge and entrepreneurship skills, employment and financial support to benefit from sustainable trade practices and opportunities. Indicator 2.1: Number of beneficiaries especially women and youth) of the initiative disaggregated by sex. Baseline: Zero (0) 2020 Indicator 2.2: No. of integrated green development assessments (Diagnostics) conducted to inform policy option. Baseline: Zero (0) Year: 2020 Output 3: Increased product and market value chains especially for green exports, exports competitiveness and exports diversification. Indicator 3.1: No. of target value chains supported Baseline: Zero (0) Year: 2020 Indicator 3.2: No. of innovative financial instruments supporting new market opportunities for women and youth in target sectors. Baseline: Zero (0) Year: 2020 Indicator 3.3: No. of Public Private Partnerships in trade and related areas engaged. Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2020 Output 4: Improved digitalization of trade in targeted sectors. Indicator 4.1: New online platform for trade digitalization and information in place Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2020 Indicator 4.2: No. of target value chains supported with innovative digital payment and e-commerce platforms. Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2022 Output 5: Project monitoring and evaluation Indicator 5.1: No. of M& E reports in place (Disaggregated by, progress reports, monitoring reports, evaluation reports. Baseline: Zero (0) Year 2020 Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) Output 1.1: Enhanced TRADE4SMEs financing for de-risking and incentivizing private sector investments Target: 4 TRADE4SMES Financing facility in place (Partial). Output 2.1: Youth, especially young women, have increased knowledge and entrepreneurship skills, employment and financial support to benefit from sustainable trade practices and opportunities. Target: 1000 (60% Women) Target: Three (3) Output 3: Increased product and market value chains especially for green exports, exports competitiveness and exports diversification Target: Five (5) Target: Two (2) Three (3) Output 4: Improved digitalization of trade in targeted sectors Target: New Functional online platform in place Target: Three (3) Output 5: Project monitoring and evaluation Target: Four (4) quarterly progress reports, 4 quarterly monitoring reports 1) To ensure that the private sector can fully take advantage of the African Free Trade Area Agreement, UNDP in partnership with 4 business member organisations sensitized over 850 export-ready small and medium-sized enterprises involved agricultural and non-agricultural value chains on AfCFTA, its provisions and opportunities it presents. 2) In partnership with Government, UNDP convened and facilitated the Uganda Africa Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Agreement dialogue that brought together stakeholders from the public and private sectors, academia, media, and development spheres. The dialogue provided a platform for national deliberations on how effectively to harness the enormous transformative potential presented by trade agreement. The deliberations also informed the preparation of the draft comprehensive National AfCFTA Implementation Strategy. 3) 0 4) N/A 5) N/A Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17). Output 1: Improving women and youth’s participation in the One-African-Market. Target 1.1: 1000 women and youth led SMEs enabled to participate in the AfCFTA Target 1.2: National AfCFTA Implementation strategy developed Output 2: Supporting digital transformation in the trade sector with special focus on enhancing the digital access of SMEs and market intelligence Target 2.1: Online market intelligence platform is put in place Output 1 1.1: Over 1,000 Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) majority of which are led by women and youth have been equipped with knowledge, skills and tools to enable their participation in the AfCFTA market and they have also been facilitated to access markets in Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan and Rwanda through trade missions organized with the technical and financial support of UNDP. From the DRC trade mission alone, over 300 business to business deals were finalized to facilitate trade in chicken and chicken products, beef, milk, fruits, vegetables and cereals among others.(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AipweIBfbI; https://www.newvision.co.ug/category/news/ugandan-business-delegation-arrives-in-goma-a-135435) Additionally, over 50,000 market vendors majority of whom are women and youth, are now able to operate safely for longer hours following UNDPs support to the solar electrification of Owino market - Kampalas largest market. 1.2: Draft National AfCFTA Implementation Strategy prepared and awaiting validation. In addition, a draft National Branding and Packaging Strategy has been developed to guide the Government’s interventions in supporting the development, and use of appropriate and sustainable product packaging by SMEs. Output 2 2.1: Beta version of a business to business online market intelligence platform developed 1.1: # of policies and regulations developed to support productivity, enhance competitiveness, and facilitate market access for MSMEs 2.2: # of MSMEs utilizing supplier development platforms for inclusive and sustainable value chains XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00143620 United Nations Development Programme This SDGs Integration and Acceleration Programme (SIA) brings together the UN System and stakeholders through platform building, and leveraging partnerships, knowledge, and resources for the SDGs implementation United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Joint SDG Fund UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00131667 United Nations Development Programme SIA brings together the UN System and stakeholders through platform building, and leveraging partnerships, knowledge, and resources for effective NDP-III and SDGs implementation in an integrated and coordinated manner. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Joint SDG Fund registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 454000 420000 100000 11 58931 United Nations Development Programme 50235 United Nations Development Programme 22833 United Nations Development Programme 17210 United Nations Development Programme 39466 United Nations Development Programme 35291 United Nations Development Programme 100224 United Nations Development Programme 37437 United Nations Development Programme 27673 United Nations Development Programme 62156 United Nations Development Programme 5530 United Nations Development Programme 22909 United Nations Development Programme 162186 United Nations Development Programme 16349 United Nations Development Programme 11606 United Nations Development Programme 90828 United Nations Development Programme 12145 United Nations Development Programme 252 United Nations Development Programme 12712 United Nations Development Programme 12176 United Nations Development Programme 14642 United Nations Development Programme 13718 United Nations Development Programme 25786 United Nations Development Programme 11148 United Nations Development Programme 11175 United Nations Development Programme 11292 United Nations Development Programme 11620 United Nations Development Programme 11432 United Nations Development Programme 11154 United Nations Development Programme 10 United Nations Development Programme 917210 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Outcome 1: By 2025 Uganda has inclusive and accountable governance systems and people are empowered, engaged and enjoy human rights, peace, justice and security (Related SDGs: 1-17) Outcome Indicator 1.1: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of approved budget, by sector (Sustainable Development Goal – SDG 16.6.1) Outcome Indicator 1.2: Proportion of women and youth in elected positions at various levels (SDG5.5.1,5.5.2, 16.7.1; Integrated Results and Resources Framework (IRRF) 2.2): (a) Parliament, (b) LC 1-56% Outcome Indicator: Governance index: Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people –especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. (Related SDGs: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) Outcome indicator 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2) Outcome Indicator 2.2.2: Economic loss from natural hazards as a proportion of GDP (SDG 1.5.2, 11.5.2) Outcome Indicator 2.2.3: Proportion of population with access to electricity and modern cooking energy disaggregated by sex and rural/urban (SDG 7.1.1, 7.1.2, NDPIII) Outcome Indicator 2.2.4: Annual emissions of carbon dioxide equivalent (per million metric tons) (SDG 9.4.1 Outcome 1: By 2025 Uganda has inclusive and accountable governance systems and people are empowered, engaged and enjoy human rights, peace, justice and security (Related SDGs: 1-17) Outcome Indicator 1.1: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of approved budget, by sector (Sustainable Development Goal – SDG 16.6.1) Baseline 90.2% (2019): Outcome Indicator 1.2: Proportion of women and youth in elected positions at various levels (SDG5.5.1,5.5.2, 16.7.1; Integrated Results and Resources Framework (IRRF) 2.2): (a) Parliament, (b) LC 1-5 Baseline Women: (a) 35%, (b) Local Council (LC) 1- LC5 - 41.4% Youth: (a) 1.1%, (b) LC 1- LC5 -11.56% Outcome Indicator: Governance index: Baseline 55 (2018) Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Baseline (2018): Agriculture (22.9%), tourism (7.3%), mining (0.3%), industry (26.5%), manufacturing (15.4%) Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Baseline: 9.2% (Youth: 13.3%, Male: 6%, Female: 14 %) (2018) Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Baseline 116/60 (2020) Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people –especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. (Related SDGs: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) Outcome indicator 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2) Baseline: Forest cover, 9.5%; Wetlands c Outcome 1: By 2025 Uganda has inclusive and accountable governance systems and people are empowered, engaged and enjoy human rights, peace, justice and security (Related SDGs: 1-17) Outcome Indicator 1.1: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of approved budget, by sector (Sustainable Development Goal – SDG 16.6.1) Target 98% Outcome Indicator 1.2: Proportion of women and youth in elected positions at various levels (SDG5.5.1,5.5.2, 16.7.1; Integrated Results and Resources Framework (IRRF) 2.2): (a) Parliament, (b) LC 1-5 Target Women: (a) 38%, (b) LC1- LC5 - 44% Youth: (a) 2%, (b) LC1- LC5 - 15% Outcome Indicator: Governance index: Target: 60 Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Target (2025): Agriculture (19.9%), tourism (8.5%), mining (5.7%), industry (28.6%), manufacturing (20%) Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Target 6.9% (Youth: 9.7%, Male: 5.2%, Female: 8.8 %), 2025 Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Target: 100/80 Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people –especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. (Related SDGs: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) Outcome indicator 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2). Target Forest cover, 18%; Wetlands cover, 12% Outcome Indicator 2.2.2: Economic loss from natural hazards as a proportion of GDP (SDG 1.5.2, 11.5.2) Target 5% Outcome Indicator 2.2.3: Proportion of population with access to electricity and modern cooking energy disaggregated by sex and rural/urban (SDG 7.1.1, 7.1.2, NDPIII) Target: Access to electricity, 30%; Clean energy used for cooking, 24% Outcome Indicator 2.2.4: Annual emissions of carbon dioxide equivalent (per million metric tons) (SDG 9.4.1) Target: 2,994 Outcome 3.2. By 2025 gender equality and human rights of all people in Uganda are promoted, protected and fulfilled in a culturally responsive environment. (Related SDG: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17) Outcome Indicator 3.2.1: Gender Inequality Index Target: 0.2 Outcome Indicator 3.2.2: Percentage of population with trust in the justice system Target 65 % Outcome Indicator 3.2.3: National budget compliance to gender and equity Target: 75% Output 1: Fostered Integrated Development Planning and Effective Implementation of NDPIII and SDGs agenda. Indicator 1.1: # of Programme Implementation Action Plans (PIAPs) implemented at national and sub-national levels (Disaggregated by level) Target: Five (5) Indicator 1.2: # of Programme Implementation Plans (PIAPs) audited to identify implementation bottlenecks at NDPIII midterm Target: Zero (0) Indicator 1.3: # of MDAs supported to develop Development Plans integrating SDG Agenda/ localization Target: Zero (0) Indicator 1.4: # of PWGs with technical assistance provided Target: Zero (0) Indicator 1.5: % of LGs showing improvement in the annual performance assessment (LGPA) Target: 62% Indicator 1.6: Number of digital platforms to COC in alignment of planning and budget frameworks at national and sub-national level. Target: Zero (0) Output 2: Developed Integrated National Financing Framework for Effective Implementation of NDP-III and SDGs agenda Indicator 2.1: Volume of additional resources leveraged through public and private financing for the SDGs with UNDP support (SP 1.2.2.2) Target: $0.8m (a) National level: (public, 0.2m; private, 0.2m) (b) Subnational level (public, 0.2m; private, 0.2m) Indicator 2.2: Financing Strategy for NDP-III in place which includes capacity development for national and subnational institutions to be able to mobilize financing for NDP-III implementation Target: Draft n Place Indicator 2.3: # of new Public Private Partnerships providing innovative financing instruments or other solutions for development in selected SDG accelerator areas Target: Three (3) Output 3: Improved SDG Data, Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting Systems in line with national, regional and international frameworks Indicator 3.1: # of SDG indicators with reportable data added to National SDG Indicator Framework Target: Ninety Two (92) Indicator 3.2: # of PWGs trained and provided with skills and tools to support monitoring and evaluation of NDP-III targets and SDGs Target: Three (3) Indicator 3.3: # of LG officials (targeting 5 per district and 10 districts per year) trained and provided skills and tools to support monitoring and evaluation of NDP-III targets and SDGs (disaggregated by sex) Target: 50 in total a) M25 b)F25 Indicator 3.4: # of Innovative Annual data/reports on SDGs/ Government monitoring frameworks in place i.e (1.UNDP CPD, 2.UNSDCF, 3. the Annual GAPR by OPM, 4. CoC of NPA, 5. NDP-3 annual reporting, etc). Target: Five (5) Reports(1.UNDP CPD, 2.UNSDCF, 3. the Annual GAPR by OPM, 4. CoC of NPA, 5. NDP-3 annual reporting, etc) Output 4: Knowledge Management Ecosystem fostered to harness existing evidence, resources and collaboration opportunities for effective SDG integration Indicator 4.1: # of diagnostics conducted and/or knowledge products produced to inform policy options such as Local Government VNRs Target: Fourteen (14) Indicator 4.2: % of target LGs with improvement in community scorecard rating Target: Thirty (30) Indicator 4.3: # of policy dialogues or other stakeholder engagement forum held to promote, consult on, and popularize SDG issues for linking policy and programmatic interventions Target : Three (3) N/A - Actual implementation to start in 2022 Outcome 1: By 2025 Uganda has inclusive and accountable governance systems and people are empowered, engaged and enjoy human rights, peace, justice and security (Related SDGs: 1-17) Outcome Indicator 1.1: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of approved budget, by sector (Sustainable Development Goal – SDG 16.6.1) Target 98% Outcome Indicator 1.2: Proportion of women and youth in elected positions at various levels (SDG5.5.1,5.5.2, 16.7.1; Integrated Results and Resources Framework (IRRF) 2.2): (a) Parliament, (b) LC 1-5 Target Women: (a) 38%, (b) LC1- LC5 - 44% Youth: (a) 2%, (b) LC1- LC5 - 15% Outcome Indicator: Governance index: Target: 60 Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Target (2025): Agriculture (19.9%), tourism (8.5%), mining (5.7%), industry (28.6%), manufacturing (20%) Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Target 6.9% (Youth: 9.7%, Male: 5.2%, Female: 8.8 %), 2025 Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Target: 100/80 Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people –especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. (Related SDGs: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) Outcome indicator 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2). Target Forest cover, 18%; Wetlands cover, 12% Outcome Indicator 2.2.2: Economic loss from natural hazards as a proportion of GDP (SDG 1.5.2, 11.5.2) Target 5% Outcome Indicator 2.2.3: Proportion of population with access to electricity and modern cooking energy disaggregated by sex and rural/urban (SDG 7.1.1, 7.1.2, NDPIII) Target: Access to electricity, 30%; Clean energy used for cooking, 24% Outcome Indicator 2.2.4: Annual emissions of carbon dioxide equivalent (per million metric tons) (SDG 9.4.1) Target: 2,994 Outcome 3.2. By 2025 gender equality and human rights of all people in Uganda are promoted, protected and fulfilled in a culturally responsive environment. (Related SDG: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17) Outcome Indicator 3.2.1: Gender Inequality Index Target: 0.2 Outcome Indicator 3.2.2: Percentage of population with trust in the justice system Target 65 % Outcome Indicator 3.2.3: National budget compliance to gender and equity Target: 75% Output 1: Fostered Integrated Development Planning and Effective Implementation of NDPIII and SDGs agenda. Indicator 1.1: # of Programme Implementation Action Plans (PIAPs) implemented at national and sub-national levels (Disaggregated by level) Target: Eight (8) Indicator 1.2: # of Programme Implementation Plans (PIAPs) audited to identify implementation bottlenecks at NDPIII midterm Target: Zero (0) Indicator 1.3: # of MDAs supported to develop Development Plans integrating SDG Agenda/ localization Target: Four (4) Indicator 1.4: # of PWGs with technical assistance provided Target: Two (2) Indicator 1.5: % of LGs showing improvement in the annual performance assessment (LGPA) Target: 66% Indicator 1.6: Number of digital platforms to COC in alignment of planning and budget frameworks at national and sub-national level. Target: One (1) Output 2: Developed Integrated National Financing Framework for Effective Implementation of NDP-III and SDGs agenda Indicator 2.1: Volume of additional resources leveraged through public and private financing for the SDGs with UNDP support (SP 1.2.2.2) Target: $1.2m (a) National level: (public, 0.3m; private, 0.3m) (b) Subnational level (public, 0.3m; private, 0.3m) Indicator 2.2: Financing Strategy for NDP-III in place which includes capacity development for national and subnational institutions to be able to mobilize financing for NDP-III implementation Target: Financing Strategy in place by end of 2022 Indicator 2.3: # of new Public Private Partnerships providing innovative financing instruments or other solutions for development in selected SDG accelerator areas Target: Six (6) Output 3: Improved SDG Data, Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting Systems in line with national, regional and international frameworks Indicator 3.1: # of SDG indicators with reportable data added to National SDG Indicator Framework Target: One Hundred Ten (110 ) (2020) Indicator 3.2: # of PWGs trained and provided with skills and tools to support monitoring and evaluation of NDP-III targets and SDGs Target: Six (6) Indicator 3.3: # of LG officials (targeting 5 per district and 10 districts per year) trained and provided skills and tools to support monitoring and evaluation of NDP-III targets and SDGs (disaggregated by sex) Target: Total: 100 a) M50 b) F50 Indicator 3.4: # of Innovative Annual data/reports on SDGs/ Government monitoring frameworks in place i.e (1.UNDP CPD, 2.UNSDCF, 3. the Annual GAPR by OPM, 4. CoC of NPA, 5. NDP-3 annual reporting, etc). Target: 5 Reports(1.UNDP CPD, 2.UNSDCF, 3. the Annual GAPR by OPM, 4. CoC of NPA, 5. NDP-3 annual reporting, etc). Output 4: Knowledge Management Ecosystem fostered to harness existing evidence, resources and collaboration opportunities for effective SDG integration Indicator 4.1: # of diagnostics conducted and/or knowledge products produced to inform policy options such as Local Government VNRs Target: Sixteen (16) Indicator 4.2: % of target LGs with improvement in community scorecard rating Target: Fourty (40) Indicator 4.3: # of policy dialogues or other stakeholder engagement forum held to promote, consult on, and popularize SDG issues for linking policy and programmatic interventions Target : Five (5) Results attained under output 1: - Twenty (20) Programme Implementation Action Plans (PIAPs) are being implemented at National level - Twenty (20) Programme Implementation Action Plans (PIAPs) were reviewed in 2022 during the NDP3 MTR process. - One (1) digital platform completed to Certificate of Compliance (COC) in alignment of planning and budget frameworks. Results attained under output 2: -Development and Validation of the Public Investment Financing Strategy (PIFS) accomplished on 14th March 2022. -Public Investment Financing Strategy (PIFS) finalized. Waiting for the launch. Results attained under output 3 - 119 out of 201 SDG indicators applicable to Uganda have data points (SDG indicators with reportable data). - Two (2) SDG related reports (1: UNDP, UNWOMEN and UNFPA JP on data and statistics and 1 SDG progress report); SDGs Progress Report 2022; GAPR 2022; CoC. Results attained under output 4 - Supported the production of 3 reports (SDG progress report 2021; Multidimensional poverty index report 2020; and Poverty status report 2021) at national level and 4 reports at UNDP level. - Draft AfCFTA implementation strategy; Cost of Credit Report; APEX Report on commercialization of agriculture. - One (1) national SDG conference and 3 regional SDG conference (Statcom8; Abuja; Pretoria; AEC) were held with support form UNDP and other DPs in 2022 # of Programme Implementation Action Plans (PIAPs) implemented at national and sub-national levels (Disaggregated by level) # of Programme Implementation Plans (PIAPs) audited to identify implementation bottlenecks at NDPIII midterm # of MDAs supported to develop Development Plans integrating SDG Agenda/ localization # of PWGs with technical assistance provided % of LGs showing improvement in the annual performance assessment (LGPA) Number of digital platforms to COC in alignment of planning and budget frameworks at national and sub-national level. Indicator 2.1: Volume of additional resources leveraged through public and private financing for the SDGs with UNDP support (SP 1.2.2.2) Indicator 2.2: Financing Strategy for NDP-III in place which includes capacity development for national and subnational institutions to be able to mobilize financing for NDP-III implementation # of new Public Private Partnerships providing innovative financing instruments or other solutions for development in selected SDG accelerator areas # of SDG indicators with reportable data added to National SDG Indicator Framework # of PWGs trained and provided with skills and tools to support monitoring and evaluation of NDP-III targets and SDGs # of LG officials (targeting 5 per district and 10 districts per year) trained and provided skills and tools to support monitoring and evaluation of NDP-III targets and SDGs (disaggregated by sex) # of Innovative Annual data/reports on SDGs/ Government monitoring frameworks in place i.e (1.UNDP CPD, 2.UNSDCF, 3. the Annual GAPR by OPM, 4. CoC of NPA, 5. NDP-3 annual reporting, etc). Indicator 4.1: # of diagnostics conducted and/or knowledge products produced to inform policy options such as Local Government VNRs Indicator 4.2: % of target LGs with improvement in community scorecard rating # of policy dialogues or other stakeholder engagement forum held to promote, consult on, and popularize SDG issues for linking policy and programmatic interventions XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00143656 United Nations Development Programme National efforts to strengthen the private sector to enhance productivity, sustain increase in production & incomes; improve livelihoods; strengthen resilience; & expand employment opportunities especially for youth, women & marginalized groups. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00131692 United Nations Development Programme National efforts to strengthen the private sector to enhance productivity, sustain increase in production & incomes; improve livelihoods; strengthen resilience; & expand employment opportunities especially for youth, women & marginalized groups. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 303951 20000 5123 5003 1384 United Nations Development Programme 78339 United Nations Development Programme 1009 United Nations Development Programme 41729 United Nations Development Programme 20867 United Nations Development Programme 1294 United Nations Development Programme 79635 United Nations Development Programme 994 United Nations Development Programme 968 United Nations Development Programme 6075 United Nations Development Programme 25230 United Nations Development Programme 5107 United Nations Development Programme 10 United Nations Development Programme 309068 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. Outcome Indicator 1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Outcome Indicator 2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Outcome Indicator 3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Output 1: Capacities of targeted MDAs in agriculture, tourism and mining sectors are enhanced to develop and implement inclusive policies and strategies that increase productivity, improve competitiveness, and facilitate market access for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) Indicator 1.1: # of policies and regulations developed to support productivity, enhance competitiveness, and facilitate market access for MSMEs. Output 2: Public and private sector institutions, especially MSMEs, in targeted value chains have increased capacity and access to productive assets and markets; and engage in green and inclusive businesses for livelihood and job creation Output Indicators. Indicator 2.1: # of inclusive green business models initiated or scaled up for improved livelihoods. Indicator 2.2: # of MSMEs utilizing supplier development platforms for inclusive and sustainable value chains Indicator 2.3: # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women. Indicator 2.4: # of MSMEs developed targeting vulnerable women and youth. Output 3: Capacities of men and women, particularly youth and marginalized groups, enhanced to access and benefit from innovative technologies, natural and productive resources for expanded livelihoods, decent work and employment opportunities in formal and informal sectors. Indicator 3.1: # of new decent jobs (formal and informal) generated, disaggregated by sex, age, disability. Indic Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. Outcome Indicator 1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Baseline (2018): Agriculture (22.9%), tourism (7.3%), mining (0.3%), industry (26.5%), manufacturing (15.4%) Outcome Indicator 2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Baseline: 9.2% (Youth: 13.3%, Male: 6%, Female: 14 %) (2018) Outcome Indicator 3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Baseline: 116/60 (2020) Output 1: Capacities of targeted MDAs in agriculture, tourism and mining sectors are enhanced to develop and implement inclusive policies and strategies that increase productivity, improve competitiveness, and facilitate market access for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) Gender marker: Gen 2. Indicator 1.1: # of policies and regulations developed to support productivity, enhance competitiveness, and facilitate market access for MSMEs Baseline: Three (3) Year: 2020 Output 2: Public and private sector institutions, especially MSMEs, in targeted value chains have increased capacity and access to productive assets and markets; and engage in green and inclusive businesses for livelihood and job creation Indicator 2.1: # of inclusive green business models initiated or scaled up for improved livelihoods Baseline: Sixteen (16) Year: 2020 Indicator 2.2: # of MSMEs utilizing supplier development platforms for inclusive and sustainable value chains Baseline: Zero (0) Year: 2020 Indicator 2.3: # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women Baseline: One Hundred (100) Year: 2020 Indicator 2.4: # of MSMEs developed targeting vulnerable women and youth Baseline: Zero (0): (2020) Output 3: Capacities of Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. Outcome Indicator 1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Target (2025): Agriculture (19.9%), tourism (8.5%), mining (5.7%), industry (28.6%), manufacturing (20%) Outcome Indicator 2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Target: 6.9% (Youth: 9.7%, Male: 5.2%, Female: 8.8 %), 2025 Outcome Indicator 3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Target: 100/80 Output 1: Capacities of targeted MDAs in agriculture, tourism and mining sectors are enhanced to develop and implement inclusive policies and strategies that increase productivity, improve competitiveness, and facilitate market access for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) Indicator 1.1: # of policies and regulations developed to support productivity, enhance competitiveness, and facilitate market access for MSMEs. Target: Three (3) Output 2: Public and private sector institutions, especially MSMEs, in targeted value chains have increased capacity and access to productive assets and markets; and engage in green and inclusive businesses for livelihood and job creation. Indicator 2.1: # of inclusive green business models initiated or scaled up for improved livelihoods. Target: Twenty Five (25) Indicator 2.2: # of MSMEs utilizing supplier development platforms for inclusive and sustainable value chains Target: Zero (0) Indicator 2.3: # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women Target: Ten (10) Indicator 2.4: # of MSMEs developed targeting vulnerable women and youth Target: Zero (0) Output 3: Capacities of men and women, particularly youth and marginalized groups, enhanced to access and benefit from innovative technologies, natural and productive resources for expanded livelihoods, decent work and employment opportunities in formal and informal sectors Indicator 3.1: # of new decent jobs (formal and informal) generated, disaggregated by sex, age, disability Target: 34,000 Indicator 3.2: # of youth equipped with skills and tools for self-employment Target: 10,000 Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. Outcome Indicator 1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Target : Agriculture (22%), tourism (7.5%), mining (1.7%), industry (27%), manufacturing (17%) Outcome Indicator 2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Target: 9% (Youth: 8.7%, Male: 9%, Female: 9 %), Outcome Indicator 3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Target: 109/65 Output 1: Capacities of targeted MDAs in agriculture, tourism and mining sectors are enhanced to develop and implement inclusive policies and strategies that increase productivity, improve competitiveness, and facilitate market access for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Indicator 1.1: # of policies and regulations developed to support productivity, enhance competitiveness, and facilitate market access for MSMEs Target: 1 policy Output 2: Public and private sector institutions, especially MSMEs, in targeted value chains have increased capacity and access to productive assets and markets; and engage in green and inclusive businesses for livelihood and job creation Indicator 2.1: # of inclusive green business models initiated or scaled up for improved livelihoods Target: 20 Indicator: 2.3: # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women Target: 10 sustainable development initiatives developed Indicator 2.4: # of MSMEs developed targeting vulnerable women and youth Target: 6 MSMEs Output 3: Capacities of men and women, particularly youth and marginalized groups, enhanced to access and benefit from innovative technologies, natural and productive resources for expanded livelihoods, decent work and employment opportunities in formal and informal sectors. Indicator 3.1: # of new decent jobs (formal and informal) generated, disaggregated by sex, age, disability Target: 10,000 descent jobs Outcome The contribution of the tourism industry to Uganda’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew from 2.7% in 2020 to 4.2% in part due to the diversification of Uganda’s tourism product offering. Building on the tourism product diversification successes of 2021, UNDP in partnership with Uganda Wildlife Authority and the private sector co-created the Rwenzori marathon – a sports tourism product curated to diversify Uganda’s tourism product range by harnessing the country’s rich topography; broaden meaningful community participation in the tourism value chain and drive domestic and international tourist traffic to experience the enchanted adventure that the Rwenzori offers. To further stimulate the recovery of the tourism industry from the COVID-19 pandemic, UNDP also supported efforts to promote and market Uganda as a mountaineering tourism destination. In 2022, UNDP partnered with Uganda Tourism Board and Tooro Kingdom, to curate the Rwenzori Mountain Royal expedition documentary film detailing King Oyo Kabamba Nyimba Iguru IV of Tooro Kingdoms tourism experience summiting the Margharita Peak of Rwenzori Mountain. The documentary is being used to promote mountaineering tourism in the Rwenzoris whilst amplifying the conversation about the need to tackle biodiversity loss and the impact of climate change on the Rwenzori Mountain ranges. Mining, industry and manufacturing contributed 1.8%, 27.1 % and 16.5% respectively to Uganda’s GDP in 2020/21 compared to 1.6%, 26.5% and 15.8% in 2019/20. The increased contribution of mining, industry and manufacturing can in part be attributed to the reforms in the policy and regulatory frameworks undertaken over the period 2021 – 2022 to create an enabling environment for investment in the sectors. Some of the policy and regulatory reforms supported by UNDP include the development of the National Industrialisation Policy, finalisation of the Mining and Minerals Bill 2021 which was passed into law by Parliament early this year and updating of the Uganda’s Mining Cadastral to inform evidence-based mineral licensing and investment decision making. The unemployment rate was recorded at 11.9% (M: 10.4%; F: 14.1%) in 2021 while youth unemployment was estimated at 16.5% (M:13.5%; F:20.4%) Ugandas competitiveness ranking improved from 117 (2020) to 115 out of 140 countries. This was due to a pickup in economic activity following the abolishment of lockdown measures, government policy interventions to support recovery of the private sector and recovery in regional and global demand. Output 1 With the support of UNDP, two legal frameworks to support productivity, enhance competitiveness, and facilitate market access for MSMEs in the mining and tourism sectors were developed. UNDP supported the Government of Uganda to finalise the Mining and Minerals Bill 2021 which was passed into law by Parliament early this year. In addition, UNDP also supported the Government to prepare the Regulatory Impact Assessment of the Tourism Bill 2022 to inform decisions by Cabinet of Uganda on the proposed amendment to the Tourism Act 2008. Output 2 With the support of UNDP, 43 inclusive green business models in agriculture and agribusiness, tourism, mining, manufacturing, renewable energy, construction, health and the creative arts industries have been scaled up resulting in thousands of jobs and livelihood opportunities for youth. In addition, 140 innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives (micro enterprises) targeting underserved communities/groups and women have been developed and scaled up. Furthermore, 140 MSMEs targeting vulnerable youth and women have been developed. Output 3 As a result of UNDPs partnership with 43 youth-owned and focused enterprises in agriculture and agribusiness, tourism, mining, manufacturing, renewable energy, construction, health and the creative arts industries to pilot commercially viable innovative ideas and scale their enterprises, over 60,000 decent jobs and livelihood opportunities for youth have been created. # of policies and regulations developed to support productivity, enhance competitiveness, and facilitate market access for MSMEs # of inclusive green business models initiated or scaled up for improved livelihoods # of MSMEs utilizing supplier development platforms for inclusive and sustainable value chains # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women # of MSMEs developed targeting vulnerable women and youth # of new decent jobs (formal and informal) generated, disaggregated by sex, age, disability # of youth equipped with skills and tools for self-employment XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00143657 United Nations Development Programme The GPS interventions will be centered around three broad thematic areas: i) Access and Administration of Justice; ii) Strengthened Accountability in Public Service Delivery; and iii) Promoting Peace, Social Cohesion and Resilience United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNDP Funding Windows UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00131693 United Nations Development Programme Governance and Peace Strengthening (GPS) Programme interventions are centered around access and administration of justice, strengthened accountability in Public Service Delivery and promoting Peace, Social Cohesion and Resilience. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNDP Funding Windows registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Building resilience Leaving no one behind Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 1050222 711188 624000 5244 141 United Nations Development Programme 106071 United Nations Development Programme 133231 United Nations Development Programme 18444 United Nations Development Programme 33224 United Nations Development Programme 31323 United Nations Development Programme 52927 United Nations Development Programme 84691 United Nations Development Programme 52473 United Nations Development Programme 20575 United Nations Development Programme 212189 United Nations Development Programme 31161 United Nations Development Programme 11934 United Nations Development Programme 557 United Nations Development Programme 210779 United Nations Development Programme 69389 United Nations Development Programme 18234 United Nations Development Programme 4216 United Nations Development Programme 12649 United Nations Development Programme 13494 United Nations Development Programme 768 United Nations Development Programme 998 United Nations Development Programme 3550 United Nations Development Programme 3406 United Nations Development Programme -480 United Nations Development Programme 483 United Nations Development Programme 5724 United Nations Development Programme 1055919 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Number of policy and legal frameworks for e-justice developed at national and subnational levels creating equal opportunities, pro-poor growth, and sustainable development (SDGs 5.1, 5.2, 10.3, 16) Number of target institutions with fully functional e-governance systems to promote efficiency and accountability (SDG 17.15.1/17.8) Proportion of magisterial areas accessing existing state-funded aid legal service. Number of e- solutions initiatives for enhancing business process for legislature and accountability Number of target Parliament Committees that effectively meet minimum core function performance benchmarks Number of target LGs that have inclusive local economic development (LED) strategies and plans in place (IRRF 1.2.1.2) i. With institutional frameworks for implementation in local and regional governments ii. With public-private partnerships at scale for accelerating catalytic LED initiatives iii. With urban development plans and strategies in line with the New Urban Agenda under implementation Number of democracy institutions Parliament, Judiciary, Electoral Commission) that effectively meet minimum core function performance benchmarks Proportion of target government and non-government institutions and private sector entities with programmes/ initiatives addressing values and practices that promote human rights, and equality. Number of youths (disaggregated by sex) reached for targeted civic engagement, Youth Symposiums, Regional Dialogues, leadership training, and Sports, Art, and Culture Number of diagnostics/special studies developed to inform policy option Extent to which an infrastructure for peace is functional Number of alternative conflict resolution, mediation and consensus building mechanisms at national, subnational, and regional levels targeting the marginalized, especially women and youth Existence of operational end-to-end multi-sectoral early warning systems (EWS) to limit the gender-differentiated impact of: Natural hazards, economic/health shocks (e.g. pandemics) and other risk factors Exists Fully 4 Fully Exists Fully partial National plans of action for prevention of violent extremism (PVE) in place under implementation Exists partially Fully 0 Fully Exists Fully Partially Number of agreements/MoUs signed for improved border cooperation A mid-term evaluation conducted An End of term evaluation conducted % of annual resource delivery Number of funding partnerships established to effect Programme implementation Number of Border Points with Completed Solarization Number of GBV cases concluded through ADR. No of courts and prisons digitalized. , with UNDP support Number of policy and legal frameworks for e justice developed at national and sub-national levels creating equal opportunities, pro-poor growth, and sustainable development Number of women EHRDs and women climate CSOs participants in capacity development initiatives demonstrating improved skills A midterm evaluation conducted 1 1 0 XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00133952 United Nations Development Programme Strengthening Uganda’s Public Health Emergency Response and recovery from Ebola Virus is a project implemented by UNDP in coordination with the Government of Uganda, NGO’s, UN agencies, International Organizations and Civil Society Organizations among others are, Ministry of Health (MOH), Office of the Prime Minister (OPM), Kampala City Council Authority (KCCA), WHO, Inter Religious Council of Uganda (IRCU) and Buganda Kingdom including the Number of Direct and Indirect Beneficiaries United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 All types of emergencies that are determined by GLIDE number. These are mostly, if not all, outside of any coordinated appeals or joint response plans 3500 529443 324401 18 United Nations Development Programme -3487 United Nations Development Programme 48060 United Nations Development Programme -63 United Nations Development Programme 51 United Nations Development Programme 35341 United Nations Development Programme 104871 United Nations Development Programme -65 United Nations Development Programme 98 United Nations Development Programme 463 United Nations Development Programme 4597 United Nations Development Programme 92072 United Nations Development Programme -395 United Nations Development Programme 230 United Nations Development Programme 24427 United Nations Development Programme 109666 United Nations Development Programme 192012 United Nations Development Programme 607897 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) pillar committees are sub committees of the national task force that gives over sight to public health epidemics and emergencies. National Task force (NTF) is the overall committee that over sees and gives guidance to public health emergency operations in Uganda. The NTF often conducts coordination meetings. Implementing partners are State and Non-State partners that UNDP works with to implement a project Number of TV and radio talk shows held Number of people reached with risk communication messages Number of operational heavy duty washing machines Number of UNVs deployed to support the Ebola response. National Health Care Waste Management Guidelines and Financial plan developed Number of partners supported in Civic Surveillance and Early Warning Systems and detection Number of knowledge products produced XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00143658 United Nations Development Programme DISC Programme supports Uganda to promote digitalization, innovation and smart cities to accelerate structural transformation. It provides foundation for the launch of integrated digital, innovation and urbanization solutions and socioeconomic systems. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME NORWEGIAN AGENCY FOR DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00131694 United Nations Development Programme The DISC Programme aims to support the efforts of the government of Uganda to promote digitalisation, innovation and smart cities to accelerate Uganda’s structural transformation United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME NORWEGIAN AGENCY FOR DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Leaving no one behind Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 168786 488047 2260120 2159768 2796 United Nations Development Programme 7387 United Nations Development Programme 99558 United Nations Development Programme 42290 United Nations Development Programme 22074 United Nations Development Programme 9518 United Nations Development Programme 20293 United Nations Development Programme 14958 United Nations Development Programme 1853 United Nations Development Programme 615 United Nations Development Programme 65151 United Nations Development Programme 27781 United Nations Development Programme 62718 United Nations Development Programme 77238 United Nations Development Programme 15106 United Nations Development Programme 21071 United Nations Development Programme 8394 United Nations Development Programme 3363 United Nations Development Programme 120896 United Nations Development Programme 52334 United Nations Development Programme 21001 United Nations Development Programme 56200 United Nations Development Programme 15618 United Nations Development Programme 123295 United Nations Development Programme 114487 United Nations Development Programme 33726 United Nations Development Programme 28292 United Nations Development Programme 166361 United Nations Development Programme 76448 United Nations Development Programme 37946 United Nations Development Programme 38804 United Nations Development Programme 218545 United Nations Development Programme 114947 United Nations Development Programme 164597 United Nations Development Programme 698052 United Nations Development Programme 145331 United Nations Development Programme 30946 United Nations Development Programme 559894 United Nations Development Programme 3101268 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Outcome 1: By 2025 Uganda has inclusive and accountable governance systems and people are empowered, engaged, and enjoy human rights, peace, justice, and security. Outcome Indicator 1.1: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of approved budget, by sector (Sustainable Development Goal – SDG 16.6.1) Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment, and equal rights to resources. Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Outcome Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people – especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. Outcome Indicator 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2). Baseline: Forest cover, 9.5%; Wetlands cover,10.9% (2019) Outcome indicator 2.2.2: Economic loss from natural hazards as a proportion of GDP (SDG 1.5.2, 11.5.2) Outcome Indicator 2.2.3: Proportion of population with access to electricity and modern cooking energy disaggregated by sex and rural/urban (SDG 7.1.1, 7.1.2, NDPIII) Outcome Indicator 2.2.4: Annual emissions of carbon dioxide equivalent (per million metric tons) (SDG 9.4.1) Outcome 3.2. By 2025 gender equality and human rights of all people in Uganda are promoted, protected and fulfilled in a culturally responsive environment. (Related SDG: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17). Outcome Indicator 3.2.1: Gender Inequality Index Outcome Indicator 3.2.2: Percentage of population with trust i Outcome 1: By 2025 Uganda has inclusive and accountable governance systems and people are empowered, engaged, and enjoy human rights, peace, justice, and security. Outcome Indicator 1.1: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of approved budget, by sector (Sustainable Development Goal – SDG 16.6.1) Baseline: 90.2% (2019) Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment, and equal rights to resources. Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Baseline: Agriculture (22.9%), tourism (7.3%), mining (0.3%), industry (26.5%), manufacturing (15.4%): (2018) Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Baseline: 9.2% (Youth: 13.3%, Male: 6%, Female: 14 %) (2018) Outcome Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Baseline: 116/60 (2020) Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people – especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. Outcome Indicator 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2). Baseline: Forest cover, 9.5%; Wetlands cover,10.9% (2019) Outcome indicator 2.2.2: Economic loss from natural hazards as a proportion of GDP (SDG 1.5.2, 11.5.2) Baseline: 7.5% (2019) Outcome Indicator 2.2.3: Proportion of population with access to electricity and modern cooking energy disaggregated by sex and rural/urban (SDG 7.1.1, 7.1.2, NDPIII) Baseline: Access to electricity, 21%; Clean energy used for cooking, 15% (2019) Outcome Indicator 2.2.4: Annual emissions of carbon dioxide equivalent (per million metric tons) (SDG 9.4.1) Baseline: Outcome 1: By 2025 Uganda has inclusive and accountable governance systems and people are empowered, engaged, and enjoy human rights, peace, justice, and security. Outcome Indicator 1.1: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of approved budget, by sector (Sustainable Development Goal – SDG 16.6.1) Target 98% Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment, and equal rights to resources. Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Target (2025): Agriculture (19.9%), tourism (8.5%), mining (5.7%), industry (28.6%), manufacturing (20%) Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Target 6.9% (Youth: 9.7%, Male: 5.2%, Female: 8.8 %) (2025) Outcome Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Target: 100/80 Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people – especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. Outcome Indicator 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2). Target Forest cover, 18%; Wetlands cover, 12% Outcome indicator 2.2.2: Economic loss from natural hazards as a proportion of GDP (SDG 1.5.2, 11.5.2) Target 5% Outcome Indicator 2.2.3: Proportion of population with access to electricity and modern cooking energy disaggregated by sex and rural/urban (SDG 7.1.1, 7.1.2, NDPIII) Target: Access to electricity, 30%; Clean energy used for cooking, 24% Outcome Indicator 2.2.4: Annual emissions of carbon dioxide equivalent (per million metric tons) (SDG 9.4.1) Target 2,994 Outcome 3.2. By 2025 gender equality and human rights of all people in Uganda are promoted, protected and fulfilled in a culturally responsive environment. (Related SDG: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17). Outcome Indicator 3.2.1: Gender Inequality Index Target: 0.2 Outcome Indicator 3.2.2: Percentage of population with trust in the justice system Target 65 % Outcome Indicator 3.2.3: National budget compliance to gender and equity Target 75% Output 1: By 2025 Uganda’s enabling environment is strengthened and supporting accelerated digital transformation, growth of a strong and integrated innovation and start-up ecosystem, and development of accountable, smart and sustainable cities. Indicator 1.1: # of policy and legal frameworks developed at national and subnational levels creating equal opportunities, pro-poor growth and sustainable development Target: Zero (0) Indicator 1.2: # of target institutions with functional e-governance systems to promote efficiency and accountability. Target: Two (2) Indicator 1.3: # of targeted non-state institutions with strengthened capacities for advocacy and engagement in the review and reform of legislation and policies for national and subnational governance and development. Target: Two (2) Indicator 1.4: An inclusive functional strategic platform for government engagement with private sector on digital policy review, learning and policy advocacy in place. Target: None Indicator 1.5. # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women. Target: Four (4) Indicator 1.6: # of diagnostics (special studies, analytics) conducted to inform policy options Target: Three (3) Indicator 1.7: # of public-private partnerships to improve the enabling framework for economic diversification and green growth (IRRF 2.1.1.2) Target: Two (2) Output 2: By 2025 the level of literacy and ICT skilling in Uganda is inclusively raised to significantly impact the use of digital tools to access online government and private sector service and is driving digital content development and the growth of the ICT start-up ecosystem. Indicator 2.1: # of digital platforms created for citizen participation and as channels for mass digital literacy & use Target: Three (3) Indicator 2.2: A functional Digital Skills Acceleration Programme in place to support e-education in pilot primary and secondary schools. Target: Partial Indicator 2.3: # of beneficiaries of UNDP supported Digital Acceleration initiatives disaggregated by sex Target: 1 male: 1 Female Indicator 2.4: # of accredited institutions established to offer certified skilling, entrepreneurship, and incubation development Target: Three (3) Output 3: By 2025, digitalization of critical services for leading production, social and governance sectors is gender responsive and equitably accelerated to enhance agri-business, tourism, trade, digital economy, creative industries, health, and public sector effectiveness. Indicator 3.1: # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women Target: Five (5) Indicator 3.2: # of new functional partnerships between government, academia, development partners and civil society developed to promote digital literacy and skilling Target: Five (5) Indicator 3.3: Amount of financial resources mobilized to implement public-private and civil society partnerships for the development of digital solutions Target: 1M USD Indicators 3.4: # of target institutions (National and sub-national level) with improved capacities to plan, budget, manage and monitor basic services (IRRF 1.2.1.1) Target: Five (5) Outcome 1: By 2025 Uganda has inclusive and accountable governance systems and people are empowered, engaged, and enjoy human rights, peace, justice, and security. Outcome Indicator 1.1: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of approved budget, by sector (Sustainable Development Goal – SDG 16.6.1) Target: 98% Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalised and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment, and equal rights to resources. Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Target (2025): Agriculture (19.9%), tourism (8.5%), mining (5.7%), industry (28.6%), manufacturing (20%) Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Target 6.9%: (Youth: 9.7%, Male: 5.2%, Female: 8.8 %) (2025) Outcome Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index: Target: 100/80 Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people – especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. Outcome Indicator 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2). Target Forest cover, 18%; Wetlands cover, 12% Outcome indicator 2.2.2: Economic loss from natural hazards as a proportion of GDP (SDG 1.5.2, 11.5.2) Target: 5% Outcome Indicator 2.2.3: Proportion of population with access to electricity and modern cooking energy disaggregated by sex and rural/urban (SDG 7.1.1, 7.1.2, NDPIII) Target: Access to electricity, 30%; Clean energy used for cooking, 24% Outcome Indicator 2.2.4: Annual emissions of carbon dioxide equivalent (per million metric tons) (SDG 9.4.1) Target: 2,994 Outcome 3.2. By 2025 gender equality and human rights of all people in Uganda are promoted, protected and fulfilled in a culturally responsive environment. (Related SDG: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17). Outcome Indicator 3.2.1: Gender Inequality Index Target: 0.2 Outcome Indicator 3.2.2: Percentage of population with trust in the justice system Target: 65% Outcome Indicator 3.2.3: National budget compliance to gender and equity Target: 75% Output 1: By 2025 Uganda’s enabling environment is strengthened and supporting accelerated digital transformation, growth of a strong and integrated innovation and start-up ecosystem, and development of accountable, smart and sustainable cities. Output Indicator 1.1: # of policy and legal frameworks developed at national and subnational levels creating equal opportunities, pro-poor growth and sustainable development Target: Three (3) Indicator 1.2: # of target institutions with functional e-governance systems to promote efficiency and accountability. Target: Two (2) Indicator 1.3: # of targeted non-state institutions with strengthened capacities for advocacy and engagement in the review and reform of legislation and policies for national and subnational governance and development. Target: Two (2) Indicator 1.4: An inclusive functional strategic platform for government engagement with private sector on digital policy review, learning and policy advocacy in place. Target: Exists Indicator 1.5. # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women. Target: Four (4) Indicator 1.6: # of diagnostics (special studies, analytics) conducted to inform policy options Target: Three (3) Indicator 1.7: # of public-private partnerships to improve the enabling framework for economic diversification and green growth (IRRF 2.1.1.2) Target: Two (2) Output 2: By 2025 the level of literacy and ICT skilling in Uganda is inclusively raised to significantly impact the use of digital tools to access online government and private sector service and is driving digital content development and the growth of the ICT start-up ecosystem. Indicator 2.1: # of digital platforms created for citizen participation and as channels for mass digital literacy & use Target: Three (3) Indicator 2.2: A functional Digital Skills Acceleration Programme in place to support e-education in pilot primary and secondary schools. Target: Exists Indicator 2.3: # of beneficiaries of UNDP supported Digital Acceleration initiatives disaggregated by sex Target: 100 Indicator 2.4: # of accredited institutions established to offer certified skilling, entrepreneurship, and incubation development Target: Ten (10) Output 3: By 2025, digitalization of critical services for leading production, social and governance sectors is gender responsive and equitably accelerated to enhance agri-business, tourism, trade, digital economy, creative industries, health, and public sector effectiveness. Indicator 3.1: # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women Target: Ten (10) Indicator 3.2: # of new functional partnerships between government, academia, development partners and civil society developed to promote digital literacy and skilling Target: Five (5) Indicator 3.3: Amount of financial resources mobilized to implement public-private and civil society partnerships for the development of digital solutions Target: 3M USD Indicators 3.4: # of target institutions (National and sub-national level) with improved capacities to plan, budget, manage and monitor basic services (IRRF 1.2.1.1) Target: Ten (10) Output 1: By 2025 Uganda’s enabling environment is strengthened and supporting accelerated digital transformation, growth of a strong and integrated innovation and start-up ecosystem, and development of accountable, smart and sustainable cities. Output Indicator 1.1: # of policy and legal frameworks developed at national and subnational levels creating equal opportunities, pro-poor growth and sustainable development. Results for target 1.1 ( under output indicator 1.1): Four (4) Strategies out of three (3) and Policy drafted. - Long-term Gender sensitive Digital Roadmap - Big Data Utilization Strategy - E-commerce strategy and Policy - Start Ecosystem Strategy Indicator 1.2: # of target institutions with functional e-governance systems to promote efficiency and accountability. Result for target 1.2: Zero (0). Indicator 1.3: # of targeted non-state institutions with strengthened capacities for advocacy and engagement in the review and reform of legislation and policies for national and subnational governance and development. Result for target 1.3: One (1) out of two (2) Supported Centenary Technology Services to design the digital transformation roadmap and the bigdata utilization strategy. Indicator 1.4: An inclusive functional strategic platform for government engagement with private sector on digital policy review, learning and policy advocacy in place. Result for target 1.4 (Indicator 1.4): A beta version of E-learning platform designed. The DISC Programme also worked with Ministry of Trade to design an e-learning platform for self-paced learning for MSMEs. A beta version of this platform can be accessed on this link https://digitalskillsforsme.com. Indicator 1.5: # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women. Results for target 1.5: One (1) out of four (4) Locally innovative Solution for Forests Monitoring designed. The Natural Resources Information System (NARIS) was designed with the Accelerator Lab and handed over to the Nature, Climate, Energy and Resilience (NCER) team for Scaling up to add wetlands. Indicator 1.6: # of diagnostics (special studies, analytics) conducted to inform policy options. Result for target 1.6: Four (4) diagnostics/Assessments done to inform the development of the below Policies/Strategies. - Long-term Gender sensitive Digital Roadmap - Big Data Utilization Strategy - E-commerce strategy and Policy - Start Ecosystem Strategy Indicator 1.7: # of public-private partnerships to improve the enabling framework for economic diversification and green growth (IRRF 2.1.1.2) Result under target 1.7: Three (3) partnerships were established and three (3) Innovation Hubs equipped with machinery for prototyping for instance, a Multi- disciplinary Makerere University Innovation Pod, Ministry of ICT National ICT Innovation Hub and Kampala Capital City (KCCA) Innovation Hub have been equipped with machinery for prototyping to enable economic diversification and green growth. Output 2: By 2025 the level of literacy and ICT skilling in Uganda is inclusively raised to significantly impact the use of digital tools to access online government and private sector service and is driving digital content development and the growth of the ICT start-up ecosystem. Indicator 2.1: # of digital platforms created for citizen participation and as channels for mass digital literacy & use. Result for target 2.1: One (1) beta version of E-learning platform designed. The DISC Programme also worked with Ministry of Trade to design an e-learning platform for self-paced learning for MSMEs. A beta version of this platform can be accessed on this link https://digitalskillsforsme.com. Indicator 2.2: A functional Digital Skills Acceleration Programme in place to support e-education in pilot primary and secondary schools. Result for target 2.2: Under the Long-term Gender Sensitive Digital Roadmap, the DISC Programme Initiated the National Digital Skills literacy Acceleration Programme pilot in Primary and Secondary schools. Indicator 2.3: # of beneficiaries of UNDP supported Digital Acceleration initiatives disaggregated by sex Result for target 2.3: Zero (0). Indicator 2.4: # of accredited institutions established to offer certified skilling, entrepreneurship, and incubation development. Results for target 2.4: Seventy eight (78) registered Startup Ecosystem mapped. Designed a platform which brings together the startup ecosystem who are mainly Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), so far mapped 78 start-up, 11 Accelerators and 2 Coworking Spaces. Platform can be accessed on this link https://uganda.startupblink.com/. Output 3: By 2025, digitalization of critical services for leading production, social and governance sectors is gender responsive and equitably accelerated to enhance agri-business, tourism, trade, digital economy, creative industries, health, and public sector effectiveness. Indicator 3.1: # of innovative, locally appropriate sustainable development initiatives developed and scaled up, targeting underserved communities/groups and women. Result for target 3.1: One (1) out of ten (10) Locally innovative Solution for Forests Monitoring designed. The Natural Resources Information System (NARIS) was designed with the Accelerator Lab and handed over to the NCER team for Scaling up to add wetlands. Indicator 3.2: # of new functional partnerships between government, academia, development partners and civil society developed to promote digital literacy and skilling. Result for target 3.2: Functional partnership have been established with three government institutions for instance; a multi- disciplinary Makerere University Innovation Pod, Ministry of ICT National ICT Innovation Hub and Kampala Capital City (KCCA) Innovation Hub have been equipped with machinery for prototyping to enable economic diversification and green growth. Due to these partnerships the capacity of over 500 end-users has been strengthened in digital skills, including Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) and , District Local Governments (DLGs). Government staff got skills in the digital Integration of Government Systems, Digital Authentication and Electronic Signatures, E-Payment Gateway, UMCS. Indicator 3.3: Amount of financial resources mobilised to implement public-private and civil society partnerships for the development of digital solutions. Result for target 3.3: Mobilised a total of USD 911,322 from Trac 2, Timbaktoo Project and CDO DPGA. Indicators 3.4: # of target institutions (National and sub-national level) with improved capacities to plan, budget, manage and monitor basic services (IRRF 1.2.1.1) Result for target 3.4: The capacity of over 500 end-users was strengthened in digital skills, including Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) and , District Local Governments (DLGs). Government staff got skills in the digital Integration of Government Systems, Digital Authentication and Electronic Signatures, E-Payment Gateway, UMCS. The trained institution now have the capacity to digitally plan, budget, manage and monitor their services. Number of policy and legal frameworks developed at national and subnational levels creating equal opportunities, pro-poor growth and sustainable development. Innovations registered as ventures Innovations registered as ventures XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00143659 United Nations Development Programme NCER will ensure (i) implementation of nature-based solutions; (ii) equitable access to & use of affordable clean/renewable energy; (iii) concrete climate adaptation actions; (iv) capacity to manage disaster risk, (v) better use of nature conservation United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNDP Funding Windows GOVERNMENT OF UNITED KINGDOM UNAIDS UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00131695 United Nations Development Programme UNDP is supporting government through technical and financial assistance aimed at strengthening national capacity to restore, protect, & sustainably manage natural resources and ecosystems to enable vulnerable people adapt to climate change. United Nations Development Programme UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNAIDS GOVERNMENT OF UNITED KINGDOM UNDP Funding Windows registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Healthy planet Global COVID-19 All types of emergencies that are determined by GLIDE number. These are mostly, if not all, outside of any coordinated appeals or joint response plans 225000 1111662 1526722 909819 64339 4032 United Nations Development Programme 14505 United Nations Development Programme 126340 United Nations Development Programme 36242 United Nations Development Programme 139771 United Nations Development Programme 78642 United Nations Development Programme 132598 United Nations Development Programme 49930 United Nations Development Programme 32723 United Nations Development Programme 18994 United Nations Development Programme 51225 United Nations Development Programme 22155 United Nations Development Programme 134192 United Nations Development Programme 289600 United Nations Development Programme 229522 United Nations Development Programme 343599 United Nations Development Programme 87791 United Nations Development Programme 16486 United Nations Development Programme 41938 United Nations Development Programme 16140 United Nations Development Programme 10353 United Nations Development Programme 52612 United Nations Development Programme 55229 United Nations Development Programme 20293 United Nations Development Programme 12279 United Nations Development Programme 494876 United Nations Development Programme 13897 United Nations Development Programme 15945 United Nations Development Programme 97904 United Nations Development Programme 91382 United Nations Development Programme 42354 United Nations Development Programme 3434 United Nations Development Programme 5507 United Nations Development Programme 69 United Nations Development Programme 8197 United Nations Development Programme 43407 United Nations Development Programme 3262237 United Nations Development Programme UNDP as the Implementing Partner will comply with the policies, procedures and practices of the United Nations Security Management System (UNSMS.) Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17). Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Outcome Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people –especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. (Related SDGs: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17). Outcome Indicator: 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2). Outcome Indicator 2.2.2: Economic loss from natural hazards as a proportion of GDP (SDG 1.5.2, 11.5.2) Outcome 2.2.3: Proportion of population with access to electricity and modern cooking energy disaggregated by sex and rural/urban (SDG 7.1.1, 7.1.2, NDPIII). Outcome Indicator 2.2.4: Annual emissions of carbondioxide equivalent (per million metric tons) (SDG 9.4.1). Outcome 3.2. By 2025 gender equality and human rights of all people in Uganda are promoted, protected and fulfilled in a culturally responsive environment. (Related SDG: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17). outcome Indicator 3.2.1: Gender Inequality Index Outcome Indicator 3.2.2: Percentage of population with trust in the justice system Outcome Indicator 3.2.3: National budget compliance to gender and equity Output 1: Forests, wetlands, and critical ecosystems are restored and conserved for nature-based solutions. Indicators Indicator 1.1: Natural Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17). Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Baseline: Agriculture (22.9%), tourism (7.3%), mining (0.3%), industry (26.5%), manufacturing (15.4%) (2018) Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Baseline: 9.2% (Youth: 13.3%, Male: 6%, Female: 14 %) (2018). Outcome Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index Baseline: 116/60 (2020). Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people –especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. (Related SDGs: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17). Outcome Indicator: 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2). Baseline: Forest cover, 9.5%; Wetlands cover,10.9% (2019). Outcome Indicator 2.2.2: Economic loss from natural hazards as a proportion of GDP (SDG 1.5.2, 11.5.2) Baseline: 7.5% (2019) Outcome 2.2.3: Proportion of population with access to electricity and modern cooking energy disaggregated by sex and rural/urban (SDG 7.1.1, 7.1.2, NDPIII). Baseline: Access to electricity, 21%; Clean energy used for cooking, 15% (2019) Outcome Indicator 2.2.4: Annual emissions of carbondioxide equivalent (per million metric tons) (SDG 9.4.1). Baseline: 3,230.7 (2015); Outcome 3.2. By 2025 gender equality and human rights of all people in Uganda are promoted, protected and fulfilled in a culturally responsive environment. (Related SDG: 1, 2, 3, 4, Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17). Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Target: Agriculture (19.9%), tourism (8.5%), mining (5.7%), industry (28.6%), manufacturing (20%) by 2025. Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Target: 6.9% (Youth: 9.7%, Male: 5.2%, Female: 8.8 %), 2025 Outcome Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index Target: 100/80 Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people –especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. (Related SDGs: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17). Outcome Indicator: 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2). Target: Forest cover, 18%; Wetlands cover, 12% Outcome Indicator 2.2.2: Economic loss from natural hazards as a proportion of GDP (SDG 1.5.2, 11.5.2) Target: 5% Outcome 2.2.3: Proportion of population with access to electricity and modern cooking energy disaggregated by sex and rural/urban (SDG 7.1.1, 7.1.2, NDPIII). Target: Access to electricity, 30%; Clean energy used for cooking, 24% Outcome Indicator 2.2.4: Annual emissions of carbondioxide equivalent (per million metric tons) (SDG 9.4.1). Target: 2,994 Outcome 3.2. By 2025 gender equality and human rights of all people in Uganda are promoted, protected and fulfilled in a culturally responsive environment. (Related SDG: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17). Outcome Indicator 3.2.1: Gender Inequality Index Target: 0.2 Outcome Indicator 3.2.2: Percentage of population with trust in the justice system Target: 65 % Outcome Indicator 3.2.3: National budget compliance to gender and equity Target: 75% Output 1: Forests, wetlands, and critical ecosystems are restored and conserved for nature-based solutions. Indicators Indicator 1.1: Natural resources that are managed under a sustainable use, conservation, access and benefit-sharing regime (SP 1.4.1) Target: (a) Area of land under protection (3,916,486 Ha) (b) Area of existing protected area under improved management (4,000 Ha) (c) Area under sustainable forest management (800 Ha) d) Area of land under sustainable land management regime (2,800 Ha) Indicator 1.2 # of local governments and communities with robust/functional natural resource governance structures. Target:TBD Indicator 1.3 # of Platforms for knowledge/information sharing. Target: TBD Indicator 1.4: # non-state actors (CSOs, private sector, religious and cultural institutions) whose capacity is strengthened for advocating and implementing NbS. Target: TBD Indicator 1.5.: # of communities with access to financing support for ecosystem restoration, protection and sustainable management of natural resources (e.g., PES/benefit sharing schemes, revolving fund schemes, cash for work, debt swap etc). Target: TBD Indicator 1.6: Amount of financial resources mobilized and utilized for climate action (modified SP 2.5.1) Target: USD 600,000 Indicator 1.7: # of designated protected areas for the conservation of biodiversity. Target: TBD Indicator 1.8: # of diagnostic (knowledge products) on NbS best practices and lessons learned to influence/inform policy and practice. Target: TBD Output 2: Climate resilience is enhanced, and low carbon development strategies adopted. Indicator 2.1: # of evidence-based assessments undertaken by sectors to inform climate change adaptation, mitigation, low-carbon transition, and inclusive green growth. Target: TBD Indicator 2.2: # of men and women who use climate information services, and products Target: F-24.5 millions, M-23.8 millions Indicator 2.3: Extent to which an integrated climate information and disaster early warning system is functional (SDG 1.5.3, SP 3.3.1) Indicator: Partial Indicator 2.4: % sectors, institutions, and local governments translating international and national climate change policies into concrete adaptation and mitigation plans and actions. Target: TBD Indicator 2.5: # households applying sustainable and climate smart agricultural practices and value chains to improve crop and livestock productivity. Target: .TBD Indicator 2.6: # cities supported to develop, finance, and implement climate change action plans. Target: TBD Indicator 2.7: # of documented climate change adaptation and mitigation best practices and lessons learned from the programme that influence/inform policy and practice. Target: TBD Output 3: Increased and equitable access to, and use of clean, renewable, and affordable energy. Indicator 3.1: # of households benefiting from clean, affordable, and sustainable energy access (SP 1.5.1): Target: (a) Female-headed: 6,000 (b) Rural areas: 20,000 (c) Urban and peri-urban areas: 10,000 Indicator 3.2: Share of clean energy used for cooking (%) Target: Eighteen (18) Indicator 3.3: # of new development partnerships with funding for improved energy efficiency and/or sustainable energy solutions targeting underserved communities/groups and women (SP 2.1.1) Target: Four (4) Indicator 3.4: # public and private institutions enabled to access and adopt innovate renewable energy solutions Target: TBD Indicator 3.5:Number of innovative business models to adopt renewable energy and energy efficient based solutions for rural social infrastructures (schools and hospitals). Target: TBD Indicator 3.6: # institutions, including SMEs, companies that have adopted energy efficiency measures and practices. Target: TBD Output 4: Strengthened capacity for disaster risks resilience. Indicator 4.1: Extent to which an integrated climate information and disaster early warning system is functional (SDG 1.5.3, SP 3.3.1) Target: TBD Indicator 4.2: % population (men and women) who access and use climate information and early warning products for DRR. Target: TBD Indicator 4.3: Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction (DRR) strategies in line with the Sendai Framework for DRR (modified SP, IRRF1.3.1) Target: 77% Output 5: The establishment of a facility that is crosscutting. Indicator 5.1: Amount of financial resources mobilised and committed to sectors, institutions local governments and communities/farmers, and used to support climate action and livelihood diversification interventions. Target: TBD Indicator 5.2: Amount of climate finance generated for the capitalization of the facility. Target: TBD Indicator 5.3:Number of pipeline projects developed for climate financing Target: TBD Outcome 2.1: By 2025, people, especially the marginalized and vulnerable, benefit from increased productivity, decent employment and equal rights to resources. (Related SDGs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17). Outcome Indicator 2.1.1: Contribution to GDP by selected sectors (agriculture, tourism, mining, industry, manufacturing) (SDG 8.9.1) Target: Agriculture (19.9%), tourism (8.5%), mining (5.7%), industry (28.6%), manufacturing (20%) by 2025. Outcome Indicator 2.1.2: Unemployment rate disaggregated by age and sex and PWDs (SDG 8.5.2) Target: 6.9% (Youth: 9.7%, Male: 5.2%, Female: 8.8 %), 2025 Outcome Indicator 2.1.3: Ranking/score of Uganda in ease of doing business index Target: 100/80 Outcome 2.2: By 2025, Uganda’s natural resources and environment are sustainably managed, protected, and people –especially the vulnerable and marginalized – have the capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change and disaster risks. (Related SDGs: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17). Outcome Indicator: 2.2.1: Proportion of terrestrial, inland water and wetlands conserved for biodiversity and ecosystem services (disaggregated by forest cover and wetlands cover) (SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2). Target: Forest cover, 18%; Wetlands cover, 12% Outcome Indicator 2.2.2: Economic loss from natural hazards as a proportion of GDP (SDG 1.5.2, 11.5.2) Target: 5% Outcome 2.2.3: Proportion of population with access to electricity and modern cooking energy disaggregated by sex and rural/urban (SDG 7.1.1, 7.1.2, NDPIII). Target: Access to electricity, 30%; Clean energy used for cooking, 24% Outcome Indicator 2.2.4: Annual emissions of carbondioxide equivalent (per million metric tons) (SDG 9.4.1). Target: 2,994 Outcome 3.2. By 2025 gender equality and human rights of all people in Uganda are promoted, protected and fulfilled in a culturally responsive environment. (Related SDG: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17). Outcome Indicator 3.2.1: Gender Inequality Index Target: 0.2 Outcome Indicator 3.2.2: Percentage of population with trust in the justice system Target: 65 % Outcome Indicator 3.2.3: National budget compliance to gender and equity Target: 75% Output 1: Forests, wetlands, and critical ecosystems are restored and conserved for nature-based solutions. Indicators Indicator 1.1: Natural resources that are managed under a sustainable use, conservation, access and benefit-sharing regime (SP 1.4.1) Target: (a) Area of land under protection (3,916,486 Ha) (b) Area of existing protected area under improved management (4,000 Ha) (c) Area under sustainable forest management (800 Ha) d) Area of land under sustainable land management regime (2,800 Ha). Indicator 1.2 # of local governments and communities with robust/functional natural resource governance structures. Target:TBD Indicator 1.3 # of Platforms for knowledge/information sharing. Target: TBD Indicator 1.4: # non-state actors (CSOs, private sector, religious and cultural institutions) whose capacity is strengthened for advocating and implementing NbS. Target: TBD Indicator 1.5.: # of communities with access to financing support for ecosystem restoration, protection and sustainable management of natural resources (e.g., PES/benefit sharing schemes, revolving fund schemes, cash for work, debt swap etc). Target: TBD Indicator 1.6: Amount of financial resources mobilized and utilized for climate action (modified SP 2.5.1) Target: USD 600,000 Indicator 1.7: # of designated protected areas for the conservation of biodiversity. Target: TBD Indicator 1.8: # of diagnostic (knowledge products) on NbS best practices and lessons learned to influence/inform policy and practice. Target: TBD Output 2: Climate resilience is enhanced, and low carbon development strategies adopted. Indicator 2.1: # of evidence-based assessments undertaken by sectors to inform climate change adaptation, mitigation, low-carbon transition, and inclusive green growth. Target: TBD Indicator 2.2: # of men and women who use climate information services, and products Target: F-24.5 millions, M-23.8 millions Indicator 2.3: Extent to which an integrated climate information and disaster early warning system is functional (SDG 1.5.3, SP 3.3.1) Indicator: Fully Indicator 2.4: % sectors, institutions, and local governments translating international and national climate change policies into concrete adaptation and mitigation plans and actions. Target: TBD Indicator 2.5: # households applying sustainable and climate smart agricultural practices and value chains to improve crop and livestock productivity. Target: .TBD Indicator 2.6: # cities supported to develop, finance, and implement climate change action plans. Target: TBD Indicator 2.7: # of documented climate change adaptation and mitigation best practices and lessons learned from the programme that influence/inform policy and practice. Target: TBD Output 3: Increased and equitable access to, and use of clean, renewable, and affordable energy. Indicator 3.1: # of households benefiting from clean, affordable, and sustainable energy access (SP 1.5.1): Target: (a) Female-headed: 6,000 (b) Rural areas: 20,000 (c) Urban and peri-urban areas: 10,000 Indicator 3.2: Share of clean energy used for cooking (%) Target: Twenty One (21) Indicator 3.3: # of new development partnerships with funding for improved energy efficiency and/or sustainable energy solutions targeting underserved communities/groups and women (SP 2.1.1) Target: Four (4) Indicator 3.4: # public and private institutions enabled to access and adopt innovate renewable energy solutions Target: TBD Indicator 3.5:Number of innovative business models to adopt renewable energy and energy efficient based solutions for rural social infrastructures (schools and hospitals). Target: TBD Indicator 3.6: # institutions, including SMEs, companies that have adopted energy efficiency measures and practices. Target: TBD Output 4: Strengthened capacity for disaster risks resilience. Indicator 4.1: Extent to which an integrated climate information and disaster early warning system is functional (SDG 1.5.3, SP 3.3.1) Target: TBD Indicator 4.2: % population (men and women) who access and use climate information and early warning products for DRR. Target: TBD Indicator 4.3: Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction (DRR) strategies in line with the Sendai Framework for DRR (modified SP, IRRF1.3.1) Target: 79% Output 5: The establishment of a facility that is crosscutting. Indicator 5.1: Amount of financial resources mobilised and committed to sectors, institutions local governments and communities/farmers, and used to support climate action and livelihood diversification interventions. Target: TBD Indicator 5.2: Amount of climate finance generated for the capitalization of the facility. Target: TBD Indicator 5.3:Number of pipeline projects developed for climate financing Target: TBD Output 1: Forests, wetlands, and critical ecosystems are restored and conserved for nature-based solutions. Indicators Indicator 1.1: Natural resources that are managed under a sustainable use, conservation, access and benefit-sharing regime (SP 1.4.1) Target: (a) Area of land under protection (3,916,486 Ha) (b) Area of existing protected area under improved management (4,000 Ha) (c) Area under sustainable forest management (800 Ha) d) Area of land under sustainable land management regime (2,800 Ha). Result: The area is yet to be computed. Under the UNDP Anti-corruption for peace and inclusive societies (ACPIS) global project, a Natural Resource Information System (NARIS) has been set up for National Forestry Authority (NFA) and National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) to enable monitoring of forest degradation and afforestation with intention to add more components to enhance monitoring of other environmental resources. Equipment including drones, data collections tablets, GIS workstation computers, large visualization screens, binoculars, GPS and laptops have been procured for both NFA and NEMA to support monitoring of forest and other natural resources and enhance operationalization of the NARIS platform. Indicator 1.2 # of local governments and communities with robust/functional natural resource governance structures. Target:TBD Result: No achievement Indicator 1.3 # of Platforms for knowledge/information sharing. Target:Two (2) Result: There are two (2) knowledge sharing platforms 1. Knowledge sharing platform on waste to energy 2. Knowledge sharing platform on use of Neem tree seeds as pesticides Indicator 1.4: # non-state actors (CSOs, private sector, religious and cultural institutions) whose capacity is strengthened for advocating and implementing NbS. Target: TBD Result: Two (2) non-state actors were strengthened. UNDP Developed training manuals and trained 23 (13 male 10 females) UNDP&FAO staff and 36 (19 male, 17 female) partners on gender, environment, climate, and energy nexus; trained 12 (5 male, 7 female) UNDP&FAO staff and 42 partners (28 male, 14 female) on Social and Environmental Safeguards (SES) and also trained 36 (27 male 9 female) NEMA enforcement team member on ecosystems management. Indicator 1.5.: # of communities with access to financing support for ecosystem restoration, protection and sustainable management of natural resources (e.g., PES/benefit sharing schemes, revolving fund schemes, cash for work, debt swap etc). Target: TBD Result: 11: 1. The wetland restoration project in Eastern Uganda conducted an assessment on PES and plans are underway to implement it in 5 districts (Kaliro, Namutumba, Butaleja, Budaka and Kibuku). 2. There are12 Revolving fund schemes established for 12 cooperatives in 6 Districts of Eastern Uganda (Bugiri, Budaka, Busia, Buyende, Kamuli, Kaliro , Namutumba) 3. A Cash for work scheme was established in the FSURE project for land preparation among the grantees supported by Hunger Fighters Uganda. Indicator 1.6: Amount of financial resources mobilized and utilized for climate action (modified SP 2.5.1) Target: USD 600,000 Result: USD 540,000 was mobilized for Climate Promise Initiative. Indicator 1.7: # of designated protected areas for the conservation of biodiversity. Target: TBD Result: There are 4 national parks and 3 forests namely; Queen Elizabeth national park, Mt Elgon national park, Bwindi Mugahinga Gorilla eco system, and Murkson and Karuma conservation area, Mabira forest, Karinzu Maramagambo forest and Sango bay forest. These are supported to reduce pressure on the protected area eco systems. Indicator 1.8: # of diagnostic (knowledge products) on NbS best practices and lessons learned to influence/inform policy and practice. Target: TBD. Result: There are 2 knowledge products. 1. A policy brief on gender dimensions in environment, climate change and energy nexus in Uganda was developed. 2. The SCALA project in collaboration with the climate promise and NDC project developed the integrated Monitoring Reporting and Verification (iMRV) tool that will enhance reporting on the NDC targets for Uganda. Output 2: Climate resilience is enhanced, and low carbon development strategies adopted. Indicator 2.1: # of evidence-based assessments undertaken by sectors to inform climate change adaptation, mitigation, low-carbon transition, and inclusive green growth. Target: TBD Result: One assessment is underway. There is an assessment ongoing on systems-level level assessments in the cattle corridor that systems will generate climate-risk-informed evidence to catalyze transformative climate action at the sub-national level, and to guide the integration of the 2021 NDC and 2018 NAP-Ag into district-level development plans. Indicator 2.2: # of men and women who use climate information services, and products Target: F-24.5 millions, M-23.8 millions Result: Climate information was received by 3000 farmers (55%) women, who were organized in 15 cooperatives that worked with CSAII project. Indicator 2.3: Extent to which an integrated climate information and disaster early warning system is functional (SDG 1.5.3, SP 3.3.1) Indicator: Fully Result: Its fully functional Indicator 2.4: % sectors, institutions, and local governments translating international and national climate change policies into concrete adaptation and mitigation plans and actions. Target: TBD Result: 1. MAAIF is implementing the NAP Ag (National Adaptation Plan for the Agriculture sector, through the FSURE project 2. MAAIF is also implementing the Climate Change Policy and Strategy through the National Climate Smart Programme (2021-2025). 3. MWE is translating the adaptation requirements of the Ramsar Convention into actions by implementing the Wetland Restoration Projects which are GCF, UNDP and ADA funded). Indicator 2.5: # households applying sustainable and climate smart agricultural practices and value chains to improve crop and livestock productivity. Target: .TBD Result: 1) 5000 farmers (55% women) that worked with the CSAII project applied sustainable CSA practices to improve crop productivity. 2) 800 households organized in 20 Farmer Field Schools in the Districts of Nakapiripirit, Nabilatuk and Moroto applied CSA practices to improve pasture lands and livestock productivity. Indicator 2.6: # cities supported to develop, finance, and implement climate change action plans. Target: TBD Result: Plans are underway to be achieved next year 2023 under SCALA project. Indicator 2.7: # of documented climate change adaptation and mitigation best practices and lessons learned from the programme that influence/inform policy and practice. Target: TBD Result: 1. The practice of providing water for micro-irrigation was documented from the CSAII project and used to inform practice in the FSURE project, which is now establishing water harvesting for micro-irrigation. 2. The practice of storing cereals in plastic or metallic silos in the Eastern region of Uganda, significantly reduced post-harvest losses and has influenced practice in the FSURE project Output 3: Increased and equitable access to, and use of clean, renewable, and affordable energy. Indicator 3.1: # of households benefiting from clean, affordable, and sustainable energy access (SP 1.5.1): Target: (a) Female-headed: 6,000 (b) Rural areas: 20,000 (c) Urban and peri-urban areas: 10,000 Indicator 3.2: Share of clean energy used for cooking (%) Target: Twenty One (21) Indicator 3.3: # of new development partnerships with funding for improved energy efficiency and/or sustainable energy solutions targeting underserved communities/groups and women (SP 2.1.1) Target: Four (4) Indicator 3.4: # public and private institutions enabled to access and adopt innovate renewable energy solutions Target: TBD Result: No result attained under this indicator in 2022. Indicator 3.5:Number of innovative business models to adopt renewable energy and energy efficient based solutions for rural social infrastructures (schools and hospitals). Target: TBD Result: No result attained under this indicator in 2022 Indicator 3.6: # institutions, including SMEs, companies that have adopted energy efficiency measures and practices. Target: TBD Result: No result was attained under this indicator in 2022 Output 4: Strengthened capacity for disaster risks resilience. Indicator 4.1: Extent to which an integrated climate information and disaster early warning system is functional (SDG 1.5.3, SP 3.3.1) Target: TBD Result: No result was attained under this indicator in 2022 Indicator 4.2: % population (men and women) who access and use climate information and early warning products for DRR. Target: TBD Result: No result was attained under this indicator in 2022 Indicator 4.3: Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction (DRR) strategies in line with the Sendai Framework for DRR (modified SP, IRRF1.3.1) Target: 79% Result: No result was attained under this indicator in 2022 Output 5: The establishment of a facility that is crosscutting. Indicator 5.1: Amount of financial resources mobilised and committed to sectors, institutions local governments and communities/farmers, and used to support climate action and livelihood diversification interventions. Target: TBD Result: No result was attained under this indicator in 2022 Indicator 5.2: Amount of climate finance generated for the capitalization of the facility. Target: TBD Result: This is still work in progress, the financing facility is being developed (its under development) Indicator 5.3:Number of pipeline projects developed for climate financing Target: TBD Result: There are 5 pipeline projects developed along the NDC targets. Improved management means enhanced stewardship, safeguarding landscapes and the services they deliver, enhancing land and ecosystem protection, biodiversity conservation, and land management. Forest area under sustainable management land area under sustainable management Districts and communities with robust/functional natural resource governance structures for protecting natural resources. Mechanisms established for knowledge/information sharing. Non state actors include private sector, religious and cultural institutions whose capacity is strengthened for advocating and implementing nature based solutions. Communities/villages with access to financing support for ecosystem restoration, protection and sustainable management of natural resources (e.g., Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES)/ benefit sharing schemes, revolving fund schemes, cash for work, debt swap etc). Amount of money mobilized and utilized for climate action (modified SP 2.5.1) Baseline: 0 (2020); Target: $30 million; Source: Frequency: Annual Reserved protected areas for biodiversity conservation. Diagnostic study (knowledge products) on Nature Based Solutions (NBS) best practices and lessons learned to influence/inform policy and practice. Evidence-based assessments undertaken by sectors to inform climate change adaptation, mitigation, low-carbon transition, and inclusive green growth. Men and women in the community who have access and use climate information services, and products Extent to which an integrated climate information and disaster early warning system is working (SDG 1.5.3, SP 3.3.1) Partial Fully Partial Fully Partial Fully Fully Proportion of sectors, institutions, and local governments translating international and national climate change policies into concrete adaptation and mitigation plans and actions. Households using sustainable and climate smart agricultural practices and value chains to improve crop and livestock productivity. Cities supported to develop, finance, and implement climate change action plans. Documented climate change adaptation and mitigation best practices and lessons learned from the programme that influence/inform policy and practices Households in Urban and peri-urban areas benefiting from clean, affordable, and sustainable energy access. Proportion of clean energy used for cooking Development partnerships or collaborations to solicit funding for improved energy efficiency and/or sustainable energy solutions targeting underserved communities/groups and women Public and private institutions enabled to access and adopt innovate renewable energy solutions. Innovative business models to adopt renewable energy and energy efficient based solutions for rural social infrastructures like schools and hospitals. Institutions like SMEs, and companies that have adopted energy efficiency measures and practices. The extent to which an integrated climate information and disaster early warning system is functional Proportion of the population (men and women) who access and use climate information and early warning products for DRR. Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction (DRR) strategies in line with the Sendai Framework for DRR (modified SP, IRRF1.3.1): Funds mobilized and committed to sectors, institutions, local governments and communities/farmers, and used to support climate action and livelihood diversification interventions. Climate finance funds generated for the capitalization of the facility. New projects developed for climate financing. XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00144699 United Nations Development Programme The Climate Promise2 to support climate change as an integrated governance to deliver NDC activities UGA Min of Water and Env UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF GERMANY FED MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRO - BMU registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-00132336 United Nations Development Programme The Climate Promise is a corporate flagship portfolio initiative funded by multiple donors and delivered in coordination with multiple strategic partners, including as a key contribution to the NDC Partnership. Under the Climate Promise, UNDP will support Uganda to undertake an inclusive and transparent process to implement, track and further strengthen their enhanced Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) UGA Min of Water and Env GOVERNMENT OF GERMANY FED MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRO - BMU registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 8008 163640 454937 172297 1007 United Nations Development Programme 16 United Nations Development Programme -16 United Nations Development Programme 452 United Nations Development Programme 59579 United Nations Development Programme 1128 United Nations Development Programme 266 United Nations Development Programme 49 United Nations Development Programme 40436 United Nations Development Programme 3646 United Nations Development Programme -5 United Nations Development Programme 9459 United Nations Development Programme 10919 United Nations Development Programme 12081 United Nations Development Programme 2988 United Nations Development Programme 55634 United Nations Development Programme 180191 United Nations Development Programme 6244 United Nations Development Programme 39416 United Nations Development Programme 7949 United Nations Development Programme 59786 United Nations Development Programme 4947 United Nations Development Programme 7730 United Nations Development Programme 2538 United Nations Development Programme 19792 United Nations Development Programme 1581 United Nations Development Programme 88810 United Nations Development Programme 646006 UGA Min of Water and Env Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA [or the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document], the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Number of policies and strategies reviewed. The focus will be on carbon trade to meet Uganda's climate targets to meet Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. This indicator measures the number of individuals from the different line ministries, private sector and Civil Society Organizations trained on integrated Monitoring Reporting and Verification (MRV) tool. This indicator measures the number of trainings for government, youth, NGOs and private sector conducted to build stakeholders capacity to to effectively participate in UNFCCC climate change negotiations UNFCCC- (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) This indicator quantifies the total land area, (measured in acres,) where tree planting initiatives have been implemented by schools. It represents the physical extent of tree planting efforts within educational facilities within the project catchment. Number of social institutions supported with renewable energy technologies Number of NDC visibility materials prepared XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01001137 United Nations Development Programme This project seeks to respond to chronic food insecurity in the Karamoja region, which is a result of combined pressures, including environmental degradation and climate change. Most people in Karamoja are facing food shortages, either year-long or seasonal, and the region has been exposed to increasing droughts. The project will also empower the women of Karamoja through large scale commercial farming of staple cereals (Sorghum/Bulrush millet and Maize) as well as Oilseed and Legumes (Sunflower, Tepary White Beans, Soybeans and Pigeon Peas/Black eyed peas). UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-01001137 United Nations Development Programme This project seeks to respond to chronic food insecurity in the Karamoja region, which is a result of combined pressures, including environmental degradation and climate change. Most people in Karamoja are facing food shortages, either year-long or seasonal, and the region has been exposed to increasing droughts. The project will also empower the women of Karamoja through large scale commercial farming of staple cereals (Sorghum/Bulrush millet and Maize) as well as Oilseed and Legumes (Sunflower UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kotido District second-order administrative division 3.000000 34.100000 Moroto District second-order administrative division 2.638900 34.643950 Nakapiripirit District second-order administrative division 1.907180 34.596010 Abim District second-order administrative division 2.750000 33.750000 Kaabong District second-order administrative division 3.583330 34.000000 Amudat District second-order administrative division 1.806260 34.927800 Napak District second-order administrative division 2.381530 34.168340 Nabilatuk fourth-order administrative division 2.092600 34.582910 Karenga fourth-order administrative division 3.565340 33.693480 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 12822 691500 382000 30 United Nations Development Programme 3867 United Nations Development Programme 10472 United Nations Development Programme 53262 United Nations Development Programme -628 United Nations Development Programme 43264 United Nations Development Programme 85070 United Nations Development Programme 68500 United Nations Development Programme 105514 United Nations Development Programme 6605 United Nations Development Programme 171445 United Nations Development Programme 13257 United Nations Development Programme 49595 United Nations Development Programme 24622 United Nations Development Programme 17723 United Nations Development Programme -52800 United Nations Development Programme 11114 United Nations Development Programme 16238 United Nations Development Programme 8742 United Nations Development Programme 125944 United Nations Development Programme 62737 United Nations Development Programme 121009 United Nations Development Programme 60960 United Nations Development Programme 6860 United Nations Development Programme 761826 UNDP Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Number of Karamojong Women and youth groups, associations, primary societies, or cooperatives mobilised, sensitized, and organised to open-up and manage communally owned land for large-scale climate smart cultivation of improved varieties of cereals (Sorghum/ Bulrush millet and Maize); Oilseeds and Legumes (Sunflower, Sesamem, Soybeans, Tepary White Beans, Pigeon Peas/Black eyed peas, and greengrams). Number of Karamojong Households mobilised, sensitized, organised and supported with start-up inputs to undertake small-scale production of improved breeds of poultry and piggery for nutrition and income generation in Karamoja districts within the Greenbelt. 1.3     Number of large-scale farms measuring at least 100 acres and led by women and youth groups established in each district within the Karamoja Greenbelt that are undertaking large-scale, climate smart, and commercial cultivation of improved varieties of (at least 3 enterprises) in cereals (Sorghum/ Bulrush millet and Maize); Oilseeds and Legumes (Sunflower, Sesamem, Soybeans, Tepary White Beans, Pigeon Peas/Black eyed peas, and greengrams). Number of agro-producers for selected enterprises (at least three per farm) in cereal, oilseed and legumes trained in techniques and technologies that allow production to comply with market requirements (volume of production, quality, certification, food safety, etc.). Number of technologies/ equipment/ inputs introduced to allow production to comply with market requirements (quantity, quality, efficiency, food safety, nutrient preservation, bio-fortified seeds, etc.). These constraints could include Low soil fertility, notorious weeds, poor quality local seeds, short rainy seasons. etc.... Number of producers sensitized and trained in techniques for climate change adaptation. Number of processing plants/machinery/enterprises supported to undertake post-harvest and value-added activities (e.g. climate resilient storage, nutrient preserving storage and processing, fortification, labelling, etc.). Number of agro-producers benefiting from the processing plants/machinery/enterprises undertaking value- added activities. Number of agro-producers trained in processing or other post- harvest and value-added activities. Percentage of the processing plants/machinery/enterprises undertaking post-harvest and value-added activities that continue operation beyond third year of establishment Number of agro-producer groups/ associations/organizations/cooperatives/marketing groups/federations established. Number of agro-producers participating in producer primary societies, cooperatives, or farmer federations. Number of agro-producers trained in crucial aspects for inclusion in Value Chains: management, negotiation, identification of partnership opportunities, market outlooks, etc. Number of local service providers (farm and non-farm) trained to provide services that allow production to meet market requirements. Number of agro-producers linked to service providers that allow production to meet market requirements. Percentage of agro-producer organizations/cooperatives/marketing groups/federations that continue operation beyond third year of establishment. Percentage of the agro-producer organizations/cooperatives/ marketing groups/federations headed by women and/or young people. Number of agro-producers linked to existing or new Value Chains. 2.17   Number of agro-producers linked to other VC actors (input suppliers, processors, buyers, etc.). Number of partnerships/agreements (contract farming, subcontracting, other schemes) that formalize relationships between producers and other VC actors (input suppliers, processors, buyers). Number of agro-producers engaged in partnerships and agreements with other VC actors. Volume of production under agreements Number of multistakeholder platforms established with VC actors to improve coordination, discuss business opportunities and raise challenges. Number of VC facilitation events and/or meetings of the multistakeholder platform. Additional market channels established (electronic platform, fair trade, etc.). Number of agro-producers accessing new market channels. Number of agro-producers accessing market information. Number of weekly messages shared through information systems with users. Number of partnerships/agreements in operation after three years. Volume of production under agreements after three years for producers and other VC actors. Number of commercial facilities/markets constructed. Number of jobs created. Number of jobs maintained after three Overarching framework for partnerships development and public engagement within and beyond Karamoja. Number of policy forums among VC actors held to identify and address constraints at meso and macro level (regulatory framework, trade policy, etc.). Number of policy briefs addressing key VC constraints submitted to government Institutions. Number of measures or initiatives adopted to address pro-poor VCD policy-related issues. Number of pro-poor VCD policies promulgated and/or enforced (both national and local levels of Government. Number of value chain studies carried out to guide the VCD strategy. Number of studies on VC related dimensions (climate risk analysis, nutrition assessment, gender, etc.). Number of VCD strategies that are informed by VC analysis. Evaluation conducted annually covering the project interventions XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01001553 United Nations Development Programme UNDP together with KOICA cocreated a project to support in delivering the government strategies on improving livelihoods, building resilience, social cohesion, and peaceful co-existence of pastoral communities in borderlands by strengthening the local peace committees as mainstream conflict resolution structures. UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME KOREA INTERN. COOPERATION AGENCY UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-01001553 United Nations Development Programme UNDP together with KOICA cocreated a project to support in delivering the government strategies on improving livelihoods, building resilience, social cohesion, and peaceful co-existence of pastoral communities in borderlands by strengthening the local peace committees as mainstream conflict resolution structures. UNDP UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME KOREA INTERN. COOPERATION AGENCY registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kotido District second-order administrative division 3.000000 34.100000 Moroto District second-order administrative division 2.638900 34.643950 Kaabong District second-order administrative division 3.583330 34.000000 Building resilience Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 27100 1204317 3422432 111800 16171 United Nations Development Programme 158789 United Nations Development Programme 185552 United Nations Development Programme 237978 United Nations Development Programme 288671 United Nations Development Programme 148193 United Nations Development Programme 242487 United Nations Development Programme 5407 United Nations Development Programme 219962 United Nations Development Programme 156946 United Nations Development Programme 273972 United Nations Development Programme 199074 United Nations Development Programme 102307 United Nations Development Programme 346818 United Nations Development Programme 176751 United Nations Development Programme 915551 United Nations Development Programme 327998 United Nations Development Programme 22104 United Nations Development Programme 150228 United Nations Development Programme 132152 United Nations Development Programme 10694 United Nations Development Programme 23756 United Nations Development Programme 134015 United Nations Development Programme 25058 United Nations Development Programme 879246 KOREA INTERN. COOPERATION AGENCY United Nations Development Programme 2530754 KOREA INTERN. COOPERATION AGENCY United Nations Development Programme 590000 KOREA INTERN. COOPERATION AGENCY United Nations Development Programme 3511463 UNDP Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). The indicator measures the number motorized boreholes are those that are equipped with motorized pumps to extract groundwater and provide access to clean water for livestock and communities in grazing areas. This indicator measures the number of institution (staff within) trained on women and human rights, economic empowerment, peace building etc. Key to note: There needs to be measurement of the immediate learning benefits after provision of the training for the participants on the training topics in focus. This should be done before the training and after the training using Pre and post evaluation tests to measure increment in knowledge of the participants as one of the key immediate outcomes.  Include the number of participants trained. Disaggregate by gender. This indicator measures the number of sensitization sessions designed to foster peace, stability, and development within target communities Key areas of emphasis during the sensitization sessions include; conflict mediation, dialogue facilitation, trauma healing, peace education, and social cohesion initiatives. For this indicator, we count/ report on number of individuals that participate in the sessions. This Indicator quantifies the total count of dialogue sessions or meetings held as part of cross-border and inter-district cooperation initiatives for social cohesion and conflict resolution between Uganda and Kenya. Key during reporting Indicate the number indicate the number of relevant stakeholders, including local government authorities, community leaders, civil society organizations, and other key actors involved in cross-border or inter-district dialogue meetings, Key actions agreed upon. etc This indicator measures the number of conflict monitors trained on peace keeping. Conflict monitors are individuals/agencies that specialize in observing, documenting, and sometimes mediating conflicts or disputes between parties. They can operate at various levels, from local community conflicts. For this indicator, count the number of conflict monitors trained on operationalization of the SOPs, Civil military dialogue, CIMIC and operationalization of CIMIC, early warning monitoring and reporting at all levels, ie at community, sub county and at district level. This indicator measures the number of individuals (former warriors) that receive Psycho-social support (PSS) services aimed to help them recover after a crisis that disrupted their lives and to enhance their ability to return to normality after experiencing adverse events. PSS/ counseling in this indicator is limited to non-specialized service provision and not specialized mental health or protection case management services. This indicator measures the number of individuals that benefit from cash for work interventions. Cash for work refers to Cash payments provided on the condition of undertaking designated work. This is generally paid according to time worked (e.g., number of days, daily rate), but may also be quantified in terms of outputs (e.g., number of trees planted, number of kilometers of roap etc). This indicator assesses the number of individuals who attend the self reliance skills training sessions at a given time period, complete the training course and Pass the final practical assessments / final course evaluation. This indicator assesses the number of individuals that complete the skills training programme that receive start-up grants. Small Start-Up Grants: include financial resources provided to the beneficiaries to establish or expand their small-scale businesses or income-generating activities. These grants could cover expenses such as purchasing equipment, raw materials, inventory, or marketing efforts necessary to launch their ventures. This indicator assesses the number of students who start attending vocational education training (VET)/ within a given time period and complete the training course. Completion involves sitting for the final practical assessments / final course evaluation also known as DIT. This indicator measures the quantity of operational local hubs or centers that serve as focal points for economic activities, entrepreneurship support, and community development initiatives within a given geographic area. Functional Local Economic Business Centers: These are physical or virtual spaces established within local communities to facilitate economic activities, promote entrepreneurship, and support business development. These centers typically offer a range of services and resources tailored to the needs of local entrepreneurs and businesses. Services may include access to workspace, training and capacity-building programs, networking opportunities, market information, financial assistance, mentorship, and other forms of support. The indicator measures the total count of local governments that have undergone capacity-building or technical support activities aimed at mainstreaming gender equality and conflict sensitivity into their budgetary processes and planning frameworks. A gender-responsive budget is a budget that works for everyone (women and men, girls and boys) by ensuring gender-equitable distribution of resources and by contributing to equal opportunities for all Number of Project Evaluations Conducted Number of project staff supporting project implementation XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01001730 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Corporation Framework (UNSDCF) 2021 – 2025, which is in line with the Mutual Accountability Framework and the UN Reform Agenda. UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-01001730 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Developm UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Kasese District second-order administrative division 0.121000 30.007770 Kitgum District second-order administrative division 3.406000 33.336000 Yumbe District second-order administrative division 3.523540 31.282430 Amudat District second-order administrative division 1.806260 34.927800 Kyegegwa District second-order administrative division 0.429230 31.010620 Leaving no one behind Global COVID-19 996317 572168 305413 532 United Nations Development Programme 88026 United Nations Development Programme -19826 United Nations Development Programme 123366 United Nations Development Programme 59939 United Nations Development Programme 48853 United Nations Development Programme 29644 United Nations Development Programme -4298 United Nations Development Programme 4613 United Nations Development Programme 9179 United Nations Development Programme 49763 United Nations Development Programme 9471 United Nations Development Programme -287 United Nations Development Programme 22035 United Nations Development Programme 128175 United Nations Development Programme -107 United Nations Development Programme 21037 United Nations Development Programme 267 United Nations Development Programme 605165 MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) United Nations Development Programme 735367 UNDP Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). % of in- school adolescent girls and young women (aged 10-24) in target schools that have received Sexuality Education (SE) to advance SRHR and reduce GBV (SIJP 2.0 Indicator) Number of women’s rights groups and relevant CSOs using knowledge products developed by the participating UN agencies in the design of their own programmes on ending VAWG within last year. (S.I. Global Indicator D 3.1) XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01001732 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Corporation Framework (UNSDCF) 2021 – 2025, which is in line with the Mutual Accountability Framework and the UN Reform Agenda. UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-01001732 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Developm UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Leaving no one behind Global COVID-19 Appeals that are launched by the UN, whether strategic response plans/humanitarian response plans, flash appeals (coordinated by OCHA) and regional refugee response plans (coordinated by UNHCR) 61340 407685 299553 424710 19 United Nations Development Programme 8858 United Nations Development Programme 1723 United Nations Development Programme 63593 United Nations Development Programme -93522 United Nations Development Programme 48585 United Nations Development Programme 21222 United Nations Development Programme -111601 United Nations Development Programme 45417 United Nations Development Programme 39622 United Nations Development Programme 48962 United Nations Development Programme 41221 United Nations Development Programme 40396 United Nations Development Programme 9770 United Nations Development Programme 32870 United Nations Development Programme 14671 United Nations Development Programme 9302 United Nations Development Programme 9568 United Nations Development Programme 17231 United Nations Development Programme 46232 United Nations Development Programme 45602 United Nations Development Programme 42266 United Nations Development Programme 104016 United Nations Development Programme -7137 United Nations Development Programme 424709 United Nations Development Programme 324126 MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) United Nations Development Programme 639574 MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) United Nations Development Programme 1218123 UNDP Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Amount of resources delivered per year against the target under the Spotlight Initiative XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01001936 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Corporation Framework (UNSDCF) 2021 – 2025, which is in line with the Mutual Accountability Framework and the UN Reform Agenda. UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-01001936 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Developm UNDP MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Gulu District second-order administrative division 2.856040 32.430010 Kasese District second-order administrative division 0.121000 30.007770 Kitgum District second-order administrative division 3.406000 33.336000 Yumbe District second-order administrative division 3.523540 31.282430 Amudat District second-order administrative division 1.806260 34.927800 Kyegegwa District second-order administrative division 0.429230 31.010620 Leaving no one behind Global COVID-19 183115 125231 11 United Nations Development Programme 29 United Nations Development Programme 36072 United Nations Development Programme 46394 United Nations Development Programme 7422 United Nations Development Programme 58 United Nations Development Programme 31208 United Nations Development Programme 2596 United Nations Development Programme 16059 United Nations Development Programme 45172 United Nations Development Programme 34543 United Nations Development Programme 21573 United Nations Development Programme 398 United Nations Development Programme 267 United Nations Development Programme 195933 MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) United Nations Development Programme 300059 UNDP Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Number of Project beneficiaries (aged 10-24), disaggregated by sex who participate in in- and out-of -school actions that promote gender-equitable norms, attitudes and behaviors and the exercise of rights, including reproductive rights (in Spotlight supported sub-counties) (SI - Global 3.1.2 # of evidence-based life skills education, psycho-socio support, social behaviours and male engagement programmes in schools, communities and refugee settlements that promote and implement gender equitable social norms and behaviours relating to SRHR and SGBV # of adolescent girls, boys and young women (aged 10-24 ) in target districts reached with information on gender equitable social norms to prevent SGBV and promote SRHR. Number of approaches and public interventions (for social norms change), including sports, drama and dance and multimedia, promoted with Project support. Number of actors, disaggregated by sex, with capacity to advocate and mobilize community (for gender transformation and elimination of discriminatory gender and social norms and practices that cause SGBV and inhibit SHRH) in schools, communities, and refugee settlements (Linked to: UG -SI 3.2.5) . : # of organizations that have delivered interventions engaging adolescent girls and young women aimed at changing social norms and eliminating SGBV and promoting SRHR in target districts. XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01001937 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Corporation Framework (UNSDCF) 2021 – 2025, which is in line with the Mutual Accountability Framework and the UN Reform Agenda. UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-01001937 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Developm UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Gulu District second-order administrative division 2.856040 32.430010 Kasese District second-order administrative division 0.121000 30.007770 Kitgum District second-order administrative division 3.406000 33.336000 Yumbe District second-order administrative division 3.523540 31.282430 Amudat District second-order administrative division 1.806260 34.927800 Kyegegwa District second-order administrative division 0.429230 31.010620 Leaving no one behind Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 297435 427126 102 35440 United Nations Development Programme 100006 United Nations Development Programme 22169 United Nations Development Programme -59015 United Nations Development Programme 7394 United Nations Development Programme 26556 United Nations Development Programme 4638 United Nations Development Programme 11400 United Nations Development Programme 15814 United Nations Development Programme 595 United Nations Development Programme 120 United Nations Development Programme 38 United Nations Development Programme 121056 United Nations Development Programme 23588 United Nations Development Programme 14123 United Nations Development Programme 70642 United Nations Development Programme 32792 United Nations Development Programme 40575 United Nations Development Programme 36606 United Nations Development Programme 561 United Nations Development Programme 14026 United Nations Development Programme 17378 United Nations Development Programme 1874 United Nations Development Programme 27745 United Nations Development Programme 272330 MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) United Nations Development Programme 427293 MPTF-Joint Programme of the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU) United Nations Development Programme 633313 UNDP Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Number of individuals with competences held in Gender Responsive Planning and Budgeting at national and subnational levels, disaggregated by sex and sector (UG-SIJP) Number of Government and non-state actors (NSA) personnel with capacities on collection, analysis and dissemination of prevalence and/or incidence data on GBV/HP/VAC and SRHR, disaggregated by sex (UG-SIJP project indicator. Number of action plans and policy briefs developed from special studies, assessments, surveys and research to implement law and policies and monitor the use of rights- based approaches in the enforcement of laws and policies at national and sub-national levels. OP1.2.1 Status of operation of a multisectoral national and/or sub-national coordination and oversight mechanisms for addressing GBV/VAC/HP and SRHR that include representation from marginalized groups (Focus on MGLSD and DLG coordination) 0 fully functional Functional Number of the participation of scheduled interface session of the Civil Society National Reference Group with UN implementing agencies XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01003155 United Nations Development Programme At country level, the programme is designed to contribute to sustainable natural resource management, ecosystem and community resilience to climate change and livelihoods improvement. At global level, it is aligned to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and UNDP strategic plan, BIOFIN results framework. At national level, the programme is aligned to Uganda’s Vision 2040, the National Biodiversity Strategic Plan (NBSAPII), the National Biodiversity Finance Plan (NBFP), and will contribute to achievement of the Third National Development Plan (NDPIII) objective of protecting, restoring, and maintaining the integrity of degraded fragile ecosystems and increasing the country’s resilience to the impacts of climate change through mobilizing adequate additional financial resources to meet the biodiversity funding gap as well as ensure that fund are used efficiently and effectively to address the biodiversity and ecosystem challenges in biodiversity and conservation and management. The focus for Phase II will be to develop a biodiversity index to inform ecological fiscal transfer mechanisms, support the initiation of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) programme to enhance the use of economic instruments as incentives for biodiversity conservation and management; and initiate the piloting ecotourism and eco-enterprises for wetlands and Ramsar sites in cities and municipalities in Uganda UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF GERMANY GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY NORWEGIAN AGENCY FOR DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-01003155 United Nations Development Programme At country level, the programme is designed to contribute to sustainable natural resource management, ecosystem and community resilience to climate change and livelihoods improvement. At global level, it is aligned to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and UNDP strategic plan, BIOFIN results framework. At national level, the programme is aligned to Uganda’s Vision 2040, the National Biodiversity Strategic Plan (NBSAPII), the National Biodiversity Finance Plan (NBFP), and will contribute t UNDP GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY NORWEGIAN AGENCY FOR DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION GOVERNMENT OF GERMANY registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala fourth-order administrative division 0.006870 31.076890 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 58320 186185 323688 286413 7875 United Nations Development Programme 18131 United Nations Development Programme 43955 United Nations Development Programme 11345 United Nations Development Programme 19719 United Nations Development Programme 93234 United Nations Development Programme 13804 United Nations Development Programme 13997 United Nations Development Programme 43304 United Nations Development Programme 70099 United Nations Development Programme 79207 United Nations Development Programme 3702 United Nations Development Programme 30122 United Nations Development Programme 75483 United Nations Development Programme 2941 United Nations Development Programme 14902 United Nations Development Programme 677356 UNDP Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Number of Finance solutions (FS)specific pro-biodiversity finance policy documents and mechanisms adopted XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01004207 United Nations Development Programme The Eighth Operational Phase of the Small Grants Programme (SGP OP8) builds on 30 years of successful experience in empowering local civil society organizations (CSOs) and community-based organizations (CBOs) in designing and leading community driven initiatives that have enhanced household wellbeing, increased awareness and resilience regarding environmental threats, and generated global environmental benefits. With economic development pressures intensifying in many parts of the developing world and the associated rising inequalities, local communities, particularly vulnerable and disadvantaged groups are becoming more and more marginalized, unable to cope with threats associated with ecosystem degradation, biodiversity loss and climate change. Lessons learned and experience gained in previous SGP Operational Phases have demonstrated that integrated, landscape-seascape approaches are effective in mobilizing multiple stakeholder collaboration, linking local CSOs/CBOs with enabling partners and achieving mutually supportive livelihood and environmental outcomes at scale. UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Global Environment Fund Truste registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-01004207 United Nations Development Programme The Eighth Operational Phase of the Small Grants Programme (SGP OP8) builds on 30 years of successful experience in empowering local civil society organizations (CSOs) and community-based organizations (CBOs) in designing and leading community driven initiatives that have enhanced household wellbeing, increased awareness and resilience regarding environmental threats, and generated global environmental benefits. With economic development pressures intensifying in many parts of the developing wor UNDP Global Environment Fund Truste registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions 68523 159886 182727 45682 456818 UNDP Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01004442 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Corporation Framework (UNSDCF) 2021 – 2025, which is in line with the Mutual Accountability Framework and the UN Reform Agenda. UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF - Spotlight Initiative 2.0 Fund registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-01004442 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Developm UNDP MPTF - Spotlight Initiative 2.0 Fund registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Kampala capital of a political entity 0.316280 32.582190 Leaving no one behind 511631 28906 United Nations Development Programme 41667 United Nations Development Programme 51238 United Nations Development Programme 57523 United Nations Development Programme 33996 United Nations Development Programme 39239 United Nations Development Programme 159123 United Nations Development Programme 40696 United Nations Development Programme 511631 MPTF - Spotlight Initiative 2.0 Fund United Nations Development Programme 511631 UNDP Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01004449 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Corporation Framework (UNSDCF) 2021 – 2025, which is in line with the Mutual Accountability Framework and the UN Reform Agenda. UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF - Spotlight Initiative 2.0 Fund registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-01004449 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Developm UNDP MPTF - Spotlight Initiative 2.0 Fund registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Nebbi District second-order administrative division 2.467320 31.262930 Adjumani District second-order administrative division 3.250000 31.750000 Oyam District second-order administrative division 2.381290 32.500710 Lamwo District second-order administrative division 3.550040 32.750570 Madi-Okollo third-order administrative division 2.842010 31.226330 Leaving no one behind Global COVID-19 588500 108576 United Nations Development Programme 125671 United Nations Development Programme 40240 United Nations Development Programme 15369 United Nations Development Programme 199558 United Nations Development Programme 588500 MPTF - Spotlight Initiative 2.0 Fund United Nations Development Programme 588500 UNDP Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). % of in- school adolescent girls and young women (aged 10-24) in target schools that have received Sexuality Education (SE) to advance SRHR and reduce GBV (SIJP 2.0 Indicator) XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01004451 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Corporation Framework (UNSDCF) 2021 – 2025, which is in line with the Mutual Accountability Framework and the UN Reform Agenda. UNDP UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME MPTF - Spotlight Initiative 2.0 Fund registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under the section entitled “Legal Context and/or Risk Management Standard Clauses” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to the Project Document Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). XM-DAC-41114-OUTPUT-01004451 United Nations Development Programme The Uganda Spotlight Initiative Joint Programme (SIJP) under the Gender for Development Uganda (G4DU), seeks to build on the success of the predecessor programme, the Spotlight Initiative to Eliminate Violence Against Women and Girls. It seeks to capitalize on existing programmes and interventions addressing specific forms of Gender Based Violence (GBV) and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) in Uganda. It falls in line with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Developm UNDP MPTF - Spotlight Initiative 2.0 Fund registry.ug@undp.org https://www.undp.org/uganda Uganda Yumbe seat of a second-order administrative division 3.465060 31.246890 Tororo seat of a second-order administrative division 0.692990 34.180850 Omoro populated place 2.218330 33.398330 Kyegegwa seat of a second-order administrative division 0.502220 31.041390 Kitgum seat of a second-order administrative division 3.278330 32.886670 Kampala capital of a political entity Project implementation office 0.316280 32.582190 Gulu seat of a first-order administrative division 2.774570 32.298990 Arua seat of a second-order administrative division 3.020130 30.911050 Amudat seat of a second-order administrative division 1.950000 34.950000 Otuke seat of a second-order administrative division 2.500380 33.500650 Terego populated place 3.141550 31.007120 Leaving no one behind Structural transformation, including green, inclusive and digital transitions Global COVID-19 698710 -177 United Nations Development Programme 1740 United Nations Development Programme 305035 United Nations Development Programme 52794 United Nations Development Programme 18862 United Nations Development Programme 12101 United Nations Development Programme 108847 United Nations Development Programme 6073 United Nations Development Programme 39 United Nations Development Programme 698710 MPTF - Spotlight Initiative 2.0 Fund United Nations Development Programme 698710 UNDP Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm). Number of individuals with competences held in Gender Responsive Planning and Budgeting at national and subnational levels, disaggregated by sex and sector (UG-SIJP) OP1.2.1 Status of operation of a multisectoral national and/or sub-national coordination and oversight mechanisms for addressing GBV/VAC/HP and SRHR that include representation from marginalized groups (Focus on MGLSD and DLG coordination) "National level : Partially functional Sub-national level : Partially functional National level : Fully functional Sub-national level : Fully functional National level coordination at Ministry of Gender strengthened. Coordination in 17 districts supported Number of action plans and policy briefs developed from special studies, assessments, surveys and research to implement law and policies and monitor the use of rights- based approaches in the enforcement of laws and policies at national and sub-national levels. Number of key government officials with strengthened capacities to develop and deliver programmes that prevent and respond to VAWG (Adopted SI A 4.7) Existence of annual budget assessment of allocations to prevent and eliminate SGBV, VAC, HP and promote SRHR (G4DU Output Indicator 3.1.2) Partial Yes Yes Existence of a functioning system to collect administrative data on VAWG/HP, in line with international standards, across different sectors (Adopted SI A.7.2) Partial Functional National Gender Based Violence Database covering the 5 districts with NED contribution One functional GBV Database being developed